Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logitech MX revolution: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:01, 28 March 2007

Logitech MX revolution

{{prod}} was removed without comment by User:149.28.228.106. After several edits by that user, the article remains without any claim to notability for this computer mouse product. Mikeblas 00:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:SPAM. RJASE1 ^Talk 00:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as it is 100%, unadulterated spam Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 00:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup - this is a relatively significant product release by a major electronics company; how is it not notable? Yes, it needs to sound less like an ad. In a few seconds I found reviews at CNET ([1]) and Anandtech ([2]), both of which I would consider reliable secondary sources. I'm sure it was also reviewed in dead-tree-format computer magazines. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 01:00, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Answer. It's not notable per the above. It's just another mouse. It'll be discontinued in a couple of years and replaced by something else. -- Mikeblas 02:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep and cleanup as above - this mouse was quite widely reviewed as the range does have a unique feature in its unusual scroll wheel. An article should probably focus on that. -- Mithent 01:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep and cleanup, it's a product by a major consumer electronics company, and as Crotalus has proved above reliable secondary sources exist confirming its notability. Krimpet (talk/review) 06:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Just another mouse. SYSS Mouse 12:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N and maybe WP:SPAM. I think many of us can sympathize that can be tough to see your article erased for failing Notability, but the author should have been aware of Wikipedia policy and should never remove a prod. Scienter 16:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup per Krimpet. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 18:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sources seem to exist... so meets notability standards, even if AfD voters apparently don't like the product or at least don't care about it. It's not spam just because it's about a commercial product. See also the related AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logitech VX revolution. --W.marsh 18:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, cleanup, and merge with Logitech VX revolution, an identical product for laptops. External coverage is pretty much limited to product reviews but the depth of coverage (Anandtech writes over ten thousand words), suggests that this is more than "just another mouse". That being said, the current article reads like marketing material. Agree with Mithent that the new article should focus on the unique features. Irene Ringworm 19:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cleanup, and merge with Logitech VX revolution I am sorry I deleted that prod. I am not used to Wikipedia policies, as I am new. However, now I know. I do say that it needs cleanup, as the author. I also accidentally cleared the talk page for the article. See it for what happened. Whoever was posting, please put it back so I can see what it says. KjtheDj 23:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 * '''Keep''' sources seem to exist... so meets notability standards, even if AfD voters apparently [[WP:IHATEIT|don't like]] the product or at least don't care about it. It's not spam just because it's about a commercial product. See also the related AfD [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logitech VX revolution]]. --[[User:W.marsh|W.marsh]] 18:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Keep, cleanup, and merge with [[Logitech VX revolution]]''', an identical product for laptops.  External coverage is pretty much limited to product reviews but the depth of coverage (Anandtech writes over ten thousand words), suggests that this is more than "just another mouse".  That being said, the current article reads like marketing material.   Agree with [[User:Mithent|Mithent]] that the new article should focus on the unique features.  [[User:Irene Ringworm|Irene Ringworm]] 19:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Keep cleanup, and merge with [[Logitech VX revolution]]''' I am sorry I deleted that prod. I am not used to Wikipedia policies, as I am new. However, now I know. I do say that it needs cleanup, as the author. I also accidentally cleared the talk page for the article. See it for what happened. Whoever was posting, please put it back so I can see what it says. [[User:KjtheDj|KjtheDj]] 23:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)