Talk:United States Navy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
*[[United States Coast Guard]] |
*[[United States Coast Guard]] |
||
and maybe [[Joint Chiefs of Staff]] etc. |
and maybe [[Joint Chiefs of Staff]] etc. |
||
==---== |
|||
This page contains only three red links. Can somebody made pages to red links. |
Revision as of 18:03, 4 April 2005
Various topics
Moved Ships section to new page U.S. Navy ships to get U.S. Navy page under 35K. Left skeleton summaries and links to classes of carriers, cruisers, subs, destroyers, frigates. Moved weapons section up, culture and personnel down, reasoning that most visitors are going to be more interested in ships and gear than personnel. Bbpen 20:15, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
An event in this article is a March 27 selected anniversary (may be in HTML comment)
This looks sad indeed by comparison with Royal Navy entry
Yes, indeed, nothing of the history of the navy, growth of US sea power, current strength, role in the current global conflicts. And what is here is poorly organized. lots of good stuff on individual vessels and types, but nothing to tie it all together. I know this is weak, but I really don't know enough to fix it. It's a job for a gob. Ortolan88 May 02.
Looking at it with an eye to the 3/27 featuring, it seems that the submarine warfare is disproportionately detailed and technical, should be replaced with a 2-paragraph summary and the full details go elsewhere (not sure of good article title tho). To some extent, this article is itself a "Main Page" for things watery, so its emphasis should be more on leading readers to in-depth articles of most interest, rather than being the repository of all in-depth material. Stan 07:25, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Um, the picture of the Monitor vs. the Virginia was supposed to illustrate "During the American Civil War, the Navy was an innovator in the use of ironclad warships,...". That seems like a reasonable subject for a picture, though maybe a bigger one, say 300 px, would be better. --wwoods 21:53, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- A bigger sized pic wouldn't help me because I still wouldn't know what the painting was all about. A descriptive caption linking the pic to something in the text would do the trick.
- Adrian Pingstone 06:30, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Okay, how about
During the American Civil War, the Navy was an innovator in the use of ironclad warships, but after the war slipped into obsolescence. A modernization program beginning in the 1880s brought the US into the first rank of the world's navies by the beginning of the 20th century.
.
- It'd be nice if the length of the text matched the length of the pic. Cropping out the top third would do no great harm either. --wwoods 06:59, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Relationship to USMC
United States Marine Corps says
- The Marine Corps is part of the Department of the Navy. It is not part of the United States Navy, although the two services work closely together.
and, much later,
- The commandant is a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and reports to the secretary of the Navy, but not to the chief of naval operations.
which must explain why so many people say "The Marines are part of the Navy" even tho they are not. This needs treatment in this article(and better treatment there). Would this language help?:
- Thus, while they are two separate military services, with completely separate military chains of command, they do have the same common civilian command structure above their military ones, while no other two among the services have in common exactly the same civilian command structure.
(Or something more comprehensible that means the same thing!) --Jerzy(t) 19:59, 2004 Dec 8 (UTC)
Reorganise
I think all of the pages - US armed forces, US Department of Defense, and all the services (US Army etc.) need to be reorganised, First so that there is not uneeded overlap, and Second so that Army, Navy etc. are all set out the same way (eg. similar headings and article structure, just with different content.)
- United States armed forces
- United States Department of Defense
- United States Army
- United States Navy
- United States Air Force
- United States Marine Corps
- United States Coast Guard
and maybe Joint Chiefs of Staff etc.
---
This page contains only three red links. Can somebody made pages to red links.