User talk:174.126.129.226

February 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dennis Brown 2¢ 10:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

174.126.129.226 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I submitted an ANI report (here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Multiple_Admins_lied_to_me_and_should_be_sanctioned_for_bad_behavior ) about the grossly unfair actions I was subjected to by administrators. This report was very detailed with a thorough breakdown of what happened that show that those admins blatantly lied to and mistreated me. I had a legitimate complaint. And yet Dennis Brown decided to close the report. Their reason was that the event happened 5 years ago. I wasnt aware that severe mistreatment by admins is something that is excusable if it happened long enough ago. Dennis Brown also baselessly called me a troll and blocked this ip. So I filed a substantive report showing clear evidence of misuse of admin privillages, and in response i get blocked for a month? This is grossly unfair. I request an unblock and for my ANI report to be reopened. 174.126.129.226 (talk) 10:42, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No one is going to be concerned about a 5 year old grievance nor demands for revenge. This isn't about any alleged anti-IP bias. Good block. 331dot (talk) 10:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 2

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

174.126.129.226 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I submitted an unblock request which said "I submitted an ANI report (here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Multiple_Admins_lied_to_me_and_should_be_sanctioned_for_bad_behavior ) about the grossly unfair actions I was subjected to by administrators. This report was very detailed with a thorough breakdown of what happened that show that those admins blatantly lied to and mistreated me. I had a legitimate complaint. And yet Dennis Brown decided to close the report. Their reason was that the event happened 5 years ago. I wasnt aware that severe mistreatment by admins is something that is excusable if it happened long enough ago. Dennis Brown also baselessly called me a troll and blocked this ip. So I filed a substantive report showing clear evidence of misuse of admin privillages, and in response i get blocked for a month? This is grossly unfair. I request an unblock and for my ANI report to be reopened."

The reply to this was "No one is going to be concerned about a 5 year old grievance nor demands for revenge. This isn't about any alleged anti-IP bias. Good block."

My response and 2nd request for unblock: This isn't purely about demands for revenge on my end. I am geniunely concerned by the absolutely unacceptable manner in which I was treated as that ip. Those admins lied to me and had me blocked for months for dubious reasons. Since they treated me like that, I'm certain that they have treated other ip editors like that too. I have presented clear evidence of them absuing their admin privileges, none of my presented evidence on that has even been contested. They broke Wikipedia rules, and they need some kind of sanction so that they wont repeat this behavior in the future with other ips. And my block should be unlifted, me writing a detailed ani report about admin wrongdoings is not something that should be considered an offense. 174.126.129.226 (talk) 11:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I submitted an unblock request which said "I submitted an ANI report (here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Multiple_Admins_lied_to_me_and_should_be_sanctioned_for_bad_behavior ) about the grossly unfair actions I was subjected to by administrators. This report was very detailed with a thorough breakdown of what happened that show that those admins blatantly lied to and mistreated me. I had a legitimate complaint. And yet Dennis Brown decided to close the report. Their reason was that the event happened 5 years ago. I wasnt aware that severe mistreatment by admins is something that is excusable if it happened long enough ago. Dennis Brown also baselessly called me a troll and blocked this ip. So I filed a substantive report showing clear evidence of misuse of admin privillages, and in response i get blocked for a month? This is grossly unfair. I request an unblock and for my ANI report to be reopened." The reply to this was "No one is going to be concerned about a 5 year old grievance nor demands for revenge. This isn't about any alleged anti-IP bias. Good block." My response and 2nd request for unblock: This isn't purely about demands for revenge on my end. I am geniunely concerned by the absolutely unacceptable manner in which I was treated as that ip. Those admins lied to me and had me blocked for months for dubious reasons. Since they treated me like that, I'm certain that they have treated other ip editors like that too. I have presented clear evidence of them absuing their admin privileges, none of my presented evidence on that has even been contested. They broke Wikipedia rules, and they need some kind of sanction so that they wont repeat this behavior in the future with other ips. And my block should be unlifted, me writing a detailed ani report about admin wrongdoings is not something that should be considered an offense. [[Special:Contributions/174.126.129.226|174.126.129.226]] ([[User talk:174.126.129.226#top|talk]]) 11:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I submitted an unblock request which said "I submitted an ANI report (here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Multiple_Admins_lied_to_me_and_should_be_sanctioned_for_bad_behavior ) about the grossly unfair actions I was subjected to by administrators. This report was very detailed with a thorough breakdown of what happened that show that those admins blatantly lied to and mistreated me. I had a legitimate complaint. And yet Dennis Brown decided to close the report. Their reason was that the event happened 5 years ago. I wasnt aware that severe mistreatment by admins is something that is excusable if it happened long enough ago. Dennis Brown also baselessly called me a troll and blocked this ip. So I filed a substantive report showing clear evidence of misuse of admin privillages, and in response i get blocked for a month? This is grossly unfair. I request an unblock and for my ANI report to be reopened." The reply to this was "No one is going to be concerned about a 5 year old grievance nor demands for revenge. This isn't about any alleged anti-IP bias. Good block." My response and 2nd request for unblock: This isn't purely about demands for revenge on my end. I am geniunely concerned by the absolutely unacceptable manner in which I was treated as that ip. Those admins lied to me and had me blocked for months for dubious reasons. Since they treated me like that, I'm certain that they have treated other ip editors like that too. I have presented clear evidence of them absuing their admin privileges, none of my presented evidence on that has even been contested. They broke Wikipedia rules, and they need some kind of sanction so that they wont repeat this behavior in the future with other ips. And my block should be unlifted, me writing a detailed ani report about admin wrongdoings is not something that should be considered an offense. [[Special:Contributions/174.126.129.226|174.126.129.226]] ([[User talk:174.126.129.226#top|talk]]) 11:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I submitted an unblock request which said "I submitted an ANI report (here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Multiple_Admins_lied_to_me_and_should_be_sanctioned_for_bad_behavior ) about the grossly unfair actions I was subjected to by administrators. This report was very detailed with a thorough breakdown of what happened that show that those admins blatantly lied to and mistreated me. I had a legitimate complaint. And yet Dennis Brown decided to close the report. Their reason was that the event happened 5 years ago. I wasnt aware that severe mistreatment by admins is something that is excusable if it happened long enough ago. Dennis Brown also baselessly called me a troll and blocked this ip. So I filed a substantive report showing clear evidence of misuse of admin privillages, and in response i get blocked for a month? This is grossly unfair. I request an unblock and for my ANI report to be reopened." The reply to this was "No one is going to be concerned about a 5 year old grievance nor demands for revenge. This isn't about any alleged anti-IP bias. Good block." My response and 2nd request for unblock: This isn't purely about demands for revenge on my end. I am geniunely concerned by the absolutely unacceptable manner in which I was treated as that ip. Those admins lied to me and had me blocked for months for dubious reasons. Since they treated me like that, I'm certain that they have treated other ip editors like that too. I have presented clear evidence of them absuing their admin privileges, none of my presented evidence on that has even been contested. They broke Wikipedia rules, and they need some kind of sanction so that they wont repeat this behavior in the future with other ips. And my block should be unlifted, me writing a detailed ani report about admin wrongdoings is not something that should be considered an offense. [[Special:Contributions/174.126.129.226|174.126.129.226]] ([[User talk:174.126.129.226#top|talk]]) 11:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

174.126.129.226 (talk) 11:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)