Jump to content

Talk:National Federation of the Blind: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
moved tag from article space
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Spoken Wikipedia In Progress | [[User:Koman90|Koman90]] ([[User talk:Koman90|talk]]) | 01:48, 06 May 2009 (UTC) }}

==Response to complete rewrite==
==Response to complete rewrite==
I like the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=National_Federation_of_the_Blind&oldid=111285374 old version] better than the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=National_Federation_of_the_Blind&diff=111857738&oldid=111285374 completely rewritten version] of the article. Although it was unreferenced, it was less POV. If no objections, I am reverting it back to the older version and marking it as {{tl|unreferenced}}. [[User:Tuxide|Tuxide]] 20:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
I like the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=National_Federation_of_the_Blind&oldid=111285374 old version] better than the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=National_Federation_of_the_Blind&diff=111857738&oldid=111285374 completely rewritten version] of the article. Although it was unreferenced, it was less POV. If no objections, I am reverting it back to the older version and marking it as {{tl|unreferenced}}. [[User:Tuxide|Tuxide]] 20:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:08, 7 May 2009

Template:Spoken Wikipedia In Progress

Response to complete rewrite

I like the old version better than the completely rewritten version of the article. Although it was unreferenced, it was less POV. If no objections, I am reverting it back to the older version and marking it as {{unreferenced}}. Tuxide 20:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to combine the two versions. Academic Challenger 00:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

American Foundation for the Blind notation needs reference

The "See Also" section contains a reference to the "American Foundation for the Blind" which is otherwise unreferenced in the main article. The reference, however, includes the notation "formerly a rival organization controlled by agencies that were against the NFB" which seems entirely out of place and unsubstantiated. If this is to be included I think it needs to be addressed in the main body of the article perhaps in a "Relationships with other Blindness Organizations" section (which might also be a good place for some of the ACB related material) Bondolo 02:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]