International Age Rating Coalition: Difference between revisions
→Comparison table: Fixes and corrections. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Loyalmoonie (talk | contribs) →IARC generic rating system: added warning and cleaned up |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== IARC generic rating system == |
== IARC generic rating system == |
||
<!-- |
|||
In addition to obtaining official age ratings from the coalition members, developers applying via IARC's process would also get a complimentary generic age rating for their software under IARC's name at any of the participating digital storefronts. These generic ratings can apply to any territory that does not have its own rating system and/or is not formally supported by any existing age rating bodies in the world. The rating also applies to territories whose own local rating body is not officially part of IARC's system yet, notably such as Japan's [[Computer Entertainment Rating Organization|CERO]] rating. IARC plans to introduce this generic rating system into more storefronts in hopes of streamlining the age rating process for game developers. Storefronts that currently support IARC and its generic rating system include [[Google Play]],<ref name="The Verge cites Google Play adopting IARC" /> [[Microsoft Store]] (both PC and [[Xbox Games Store|Xbox]] versions), [[Nintendo eShop]],<ref name="NL cites eShop adopting IARC" />{{efn|Nintendo adopted IARC's integrated questionnaire into the eShop worldwide in 2015, but Nintendo would not implement IARC's generic rating system for Japan, as a substitute rating for download-only titles lacking a CERO rating, until October 2020 at least for the [[Nintendo Switch]] eShop games.<ref name="4Gamer cites Japanese Switch eShop adopting IARC" /><ref name="JN blog cites Japanese Switch eShop adopting IARC" />}} [[PlayStation Store]], [[Reality Labs|Quest Store]] (formerly Oculus Store),<ref name="Meta Quest blog cites IARC process" /> [[Amazon Luna|Luna store]], Pico Store, and [[Epic Games Store]].<ref name="The Verge cites Epic Games and IARC partnership" /><ref name="Overview on Epic Games developer website" /> The IARC age ratings are the following: |
|||
@@@@@****************************************************************@@@@@ |
|||
| IMPORTANT NOTE: Please DO NOT add any comparisons to other countries' | |
|||
| ratings systems (i.e., adding, "this rating is similar to X-country's | |
|||
| rating", etc.), or examples of video games. We do not need any | |
|||
| comprehensive or all-inclusive lists of other ratings systems from | |
|||
| other countries, or of every single video game. This is NOT a place to | |
|||
| promote your country's system, or your favorite video games. Any edits | |
|||
| doing so are a violation of WP:TRIVIA, and will be reverted. Repeat | |
|||
| vandals will be blocked. Thank you for your cooperation. | |
|||
@@@@@****************************************************************@@@@@ |
|||
--> |
|||
In addition to obtaining official age ratings from the coalition members, developers applying via IARC's process would also get a complimentary generic age rating for their software under IARC's name at any of the participating digital storefronts. These generic ratings can apply to any territory that does not have its own rating system and/or is not formally supported by any existing age rating bodies in the world, including territories whose own local rating body is not officially part of IARC's system yet. |
|||
The IARC age ratings are the following: |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
Revision as of 16:46, 27 March 2024
Abbreviation | IARC |
---|---|
Formation | 2013 |
Type | NGO |
Legal status | Company |
Purpose | Classification of digitally delivered video games and apps |
Official languages | Chinese, English, German, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Spanish |
Website | globalratings |
The International Age Rating Coalition (IARC) is an initiative aimed at streamlining acquisition of content ratings for video games, from authorities of different countries. Introduced in 2013, the IARC system simplifies the process of obtaining ratings by developers, through the use of questionnaires, which assess the content of the product.[1][2] This new process reduces the costs of video game developers as they seek to obtain ratings for their products that are distributed digitally online.[3]
The effort was created through a coalition of rating authorities from around the world, including ESRB in North America, PEGI in Europe, USK in Germany, ClassInd in Brazil, and the Australian Classification Board, and first announced by PEGI's MD at the 2013 London Games Conference.[4][5] In August 2014, the Australian Classification Board introduced amendments to allow for the automated classification process employed by the IARC.[6] On 19 December 2017, South Korea's Game Rating and Administration Committee (GRAC) became a member.
IARC generic rating system
In addition to obtaining official age ratings from the coalition members, developers applying via IARC's process would also get a complimentary generic age rating for their software under IARC's name at any of the participating digital storefronts. These generic ratings can apply to any territory that does not have its own rating system and/or is not formally supported by any existing age rating bodies in the world, including territories whose own local rating body is not officially part of IARC's system yet.
The IARC age ratings are the following:
Comparison table
A comparison of participants, showing age on the horizontal axis. Note however that the specific criteria used in assigning a classification can vary widely from one country to another. Thus a color code or age range cannot be directly compared from one country to another.
Key:
- White – No restrictions: Suitable for all ages / Aimed at young audiences / Exempt / Not rated / No applicable rating.
- Yellow – No restrictions: Parental guidance is suggested for designated age range.
- Purple – No restrictions: Not recommended for a younger audience but not restricted.
- Red – Restricted: Parental accompaniment required for younger audiences.
- Black – Prohibitive: Exclusively for older audience / Purchase age-restricted / Banned.
Region/Participant | Age rating | Other | Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0/1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | |||
Australia (ACB) | G | M | R 18+ | RC | The restricted categories are MA 15+ and R 18+; the latter was introduced for video games at the start of 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||
PG | MA 15+ | CTC | |||||||||||||||||||||
Brazil (ClassInd) | L | 10 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 18 | N/A | The same rating system is used for television and motion pictures in Brazil. | |||||||||||||||
ESRB Canada USA |
E | E10+ | T | M | AO | RP | This was adopted in 1994 in the United States, most of Canada, and Mexico. The E10+ rating was first used in early 2005. Games rated RP (Rating Pending) do not yet have a rating. Legally enforced in Ontario and Manitoba. | ||||||||||||||||
EC | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany (USK) | 0 | 6 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 18 | BPjM restricted | ||||||||||||||||
No labelling | StGB confiscated (Banned) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
IARC | N/A | 3+ | 7+ | 12+ | 16+ | 18+ | N/A | These ratings are used in most countries that aren't represented by or don't have any rating authority.[7] | |||||||||||||||
PEGI Europe except for Germany and Russia Israel |
3 | 7 | 12 | 16 | 18 | N/A | Legally enforced in some countries (but not all). | ||||||||||||||||
7 | 12 | 16 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||
South Korea (GRAC) | ALL | 12 | 15 | 19 | Refused classification | Some app stores require 19 + games to apply for a GRAC rating in order to be available in South Korea. |
Notes
References
- ^ "About the International Age Rating Coalition - IARC". www.globalratings.com.
- ^ Serrels, Mark (19 March 2014). "The Government Is In The Process Of Changing How We Classify Games".
- ^ "The IARC explained, and why you should care: How streamlining classification will change the culture of games censorship". Archived from the original on 19 April 2014.
- ^ Lockley, Greg (13 November 2013). "LGC: PEGI unveils International Age Rating Coalition | Games industry news | MCV". MCV. Archived from the original on 23 January 2016. Retrieved 4 January 2023.
- ^ "New International Age Ratings System Launching Worldwide Next Year - Video Game Deals & UK News - Dealspwn.com". www.dealspwn.com. Archived from the original on 22 March 2016. Retrieved 1 September 2014.
- ^ Reilly, Luke (1 September 2014). "Getting Digitally-Distributed Games Classified in Australia to Be Cost-Free".
- ^ "IARC Ratings Guide". International Age Rating Coalition. Archived from the original on 20 August 2022. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "The Verge cites Google Play adopting IARC" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "NL cites eShop adopting IARC" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "4Gamer cites Japanese Switch eShop adopting IARC" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "JN blog cites Japanese Switch eShop adopting IARC" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Meta Quest blog cites IARC process" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "The Verge cites Epic Games and IARC partnership" is not used in the content (see the help page).