Jump to content

Talk:Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign/Archive 1) (bot
Line 36: Line 36:
Would it be worthwhile to compare the tone and contents of this page and the equivelant trump in order to avoid claims of bias. They do read quite differently and the biden does more encyclopedic perhaps. [[Special:Contributions/112.213.131.0|112.213.131.0]] ([[User talk:112.213.131.0|talk]]) 03:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Would it be worthwhile to compare the tone and contents of this page and the equivelant trump in order to avoid claims of bias. They do read quite differently and the biden does more encyclopedic perhaps. [[Special:Contributions/112.213.131.0|112.213.131.0]] ([[User talk:112.213.131.0|talk]]) 03:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
:Biden is a far more encyclopaedic person. That might read a bit strangely, but Biden acts just like most normal, middle-of-the-road candidates in the past. Nothing he does is sensational or extraordinary. Trump is the opposite. Almost everything he says and does is way outside the realm of what is normal for a presidential candidate. This means it's almost impossible to give similar coverage to both of them. [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 03:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
:Biden is a far more encyclopaedic person. That might read a bit strangely, but Biden acts just like most normal, middle-of-the-road candidates in the past. Nothing he does is sensational or extraordinary. Trump is the opposite. Almost everything he says and does is way outside the realm of what is normal for a presidential candidate. This means it's almost impossible to give similar coverage to both of them. [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 03:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

== Changing the title of the "Gun Violence" paragraph under the Platform section to "Gun control/Firearms" ==

Similar paragraphs on the articles of other american politicians almost always read "Gun Control" or "Firearms", regardless on their opinions on the matter. Since whether or not the term "Gun Violence" is objective is debatable, I believe the aforementioned terms are more neutral and descriptive, especially the latter. [[User:JezzaWPU|JezzaWPU]] ([[User talk:JezzaWPU|talk]]) 17:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:29, 16 April 2024


Consideration of locking this page

It would be best if this page was locked for editing responsibilities, thus given to trusted individuals.

it has been clear from this specific article, and clear off this site that some people may not be so formal in editing and adding to this article. In order to combat any misinformation breathing in a second of air, it would be, again: best to lock this page for now during the campaigns of respective candidates, and during the post-primary stage.

Wikipedia has been a number 1 ‘first-thought’ website to look for knowledge that is sourced, so it is just my concern about these rather mischievous individuals willing to ruin the ‘reputation’ of the represented parties/individual(s) only following intentions within political partisanship (or other.)

Response do these individuals have been indeed quick, so my suggestion could also I suppose save people the time of backspacing any misinforming additions. 2601:601:A400:D4A0:E54F:7630:88B2:7199 (talk) 18:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Putting National Advisory Board into a collapsible list

Owing to the length of Biden's national advisory board section, I believe that putting it into a collapsible list format would serve to improve the readability of the article. However, my attempts at doing so seem to run into formatting issues or simply look bad. If someone with more experience with list templates can give it a go I would greatly appreciate it. BootsED (talk) 06:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biden and trump coverage

Would it be worthwhile to compare the tone and contents of this page and the equivelant trump in order to avoid claims of bias. They do read quite differently and the biden does more encyclopedic perhaps. 112.213.131.0 (talk) 03:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biden is a far more encyclopaedic person. That might read a bit strangely, but Biden acts just like most normal, middle-of-the-road candidates in the past. Nothing he does is sensational or extraordinary. Trump is the opposite. Almost everything he says and does is way outside the realm of what is normal for a presidential candidate. This means it's almost impossible to give similar coverage to both of them. HiLo48 (talk) 03:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the title of the "Gun Violence" paragraph under the Platform section to "Gun control/Firearms"

Similar paragraphs on the articles of other american politicians almost always read "Gun Control" or "Firearms", regardless on their opinions on the matter. Since whether or not the term "Gun Violence" is objective is debatable, I believe the aforementioned terms are more neutral and descriptive, especially the latter. JezzaWPU (talk) 17:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]