User talk:Lil-unique1: Difference between revisions
Lil-unique1 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Lil-unique1 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{talk header|search=yes}} |
{{talk header|search=yes}} |
||
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|maxarchivesize = 128k |
|maxarchivesize = 128k |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<br/> |
<br/> |
||
<br/> |
<br/> |
||
⚫ | |||
== ''Evening Standard'' == |
== ''Evening Standard'' == |
||
Revision as of 21:31, 29 April 2024
It is currently 3:42 AM where this user lives.
This is Lil-unique1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 21 days |
This user has tried and failed to take a wikibreak. |
Evening Standard
Hello. Just wanted to say in response to this summary, we're not using it for factual reporting, merely an opinion, and WP:RSP says there is no consensus on it (which means it can still freely be used) and is considered "more reliable" than other British tabloids (which isn't saying much, I know). I understand tabloids like the Daily Mail were expunged in all instances, including for opinion, but no consensus is no consensus. Technically users can call any news source into question and have it included there after a long discussion. Ss112 16:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Ss112:, granted you're correct here. There are probably better and more qualified reviews out there. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Cont'd of track listing template discussion
Hey Uniq. There's recent discussion for suggestion of leave the blank only for interlude as uncredited songwriter/producer. 2001:D08:2930:F7D1:17AE:4429:6506:3DF0 (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Using video thumbnails as cover artworks
Hey Lil-unique1, I just want your opinion as a music editor who also occasionally nominates images for deletion. I'm not sure if you're aware of the musical animated series Hazbin Hotel—but anyway, a few songs from the series have articles here now, and the user who created them has uploaded the thumbnails for the songs' music videos as replacement artworks in the cover= parameter of the infoboxes. I could have sworn (and you might be aware) that there is precedent, an "unspoken rule" if you will, to not use video thumbnails as covers, but as I really don't mark down dates, times and links of previous FFDs where thumbnails that have been used as covers have been deleted it's basically just my word that there is precedent rather than policy or a guideline not to do so. If you feel like offering your opinion, the discussion is at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 February 27#File:Poison Song Cover Image.jpeg. Thanks! Ss112 14:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Multiple durations
Hello. I happened to notice this edit of yours on My House (Beyoncé song). Template:Infobox song doesn't say we can't include multiple versions' lengths like it does for one release date etc; it actually says "If additional lengths are entered, use {{Duration}} for the second and subsequent lengths: {{Duration|3:09}} will produce "3:09"." Ss112 00:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Ss112, there's a long standing tradition of not including multiple durations unless its consequential e.g. the single version doesn't have a feature and is longer. Its no biggie if you want to restore it.
Genres.
Hello, there seems to be issues regarding the genres on Lotus (Christina Aguilera album). I reverted the article back to your version but user "Laylaluvalog" is now genre warring. That user has a problem with misinterpreting sources, they've even admitted to misreading sources. Along with disruptive editing on lotus they are now doing it on other articles. OkIGetIt20 (talk) 17:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Editor's Barnstar | |
For attempting to education on MOS policies, and for your continued excellence in editing. It is quite inspirational. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC) |
- @Livelikemusic: Thank you!