Talk:Aileen Cannon: Difference between revisions
Assessment (Low): banner shell, Biography, +Donald Trump (Rater) |
→Political Party: Reply |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
:They should be non-partisan but their strange and errornous rulings help Trump's delay tactics. So she's either partisan or incompetent. --[[User:Denniss|Denniss]] ([[User talk:Denniss|talk]]) 01:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC) |
:They should be non-partisan but their strange and errornous rulings help Trump's delay tactics. So she's either partisan or incompetent. --[[User:Denniss|Denniss]] ([[User talk:Denniss|talk]]) 01:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
::In her case, probably both. [[Special:Contributions/24.184.206.22|24.184.206.22]] ([[User talk:24.184.206.22|talk]]) 03:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
::In her case, probably both. [[Special:Contributions/24.184.206.22|24.184.206.22]] ([[User talk:24.184.206.22|talk]]) 03:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::So sad that this obviously biased judge is even a judge. Incompetent or corrupt. Which is better? Stupid or lying. Which is better? [[Special:Contributions/2001:56B:9FED:B65C:484:1303:C156:2D9F|2001:56B:9FED:B65C:484:1303:C156:2D9F]] ([[User talk:2001:56B:9FED:B65C:484:1303:C156:2D9F|talk]]) 18:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 May 2024 == |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 May 2024 == |
Revision as of 18:27, 6 June 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aileen Cannon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Early life and education. Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 February 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In Section
Early life and education
there is a Reference
<ref name=Wilner>
The article in the Reference is archived. But on 2023-02-14 the URL for the original article was still valid.
Into the Cite template, please insert
| url-status=live
71.162.138.11 (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Sorry for not checking the reply page sooner. 71.162.138.11 (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Political Party
Judges are non-partisan, and in point of fact, no other judge from the Southern District of Florida has a political party appended to their biography. Judge Cannon's biography should have the same designations as the other judges - either all should be called out by the political party of their nominator, or none. This article should be edited to reflect that change. 2601:601:181:7DF0:9493:A65D:BFB2:6CF3 (talk) 17:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- They should be non-partisan but their strange and errornous rulings help Trump's delay tactics. So she's either partisan or incompetent. --Denniss (talk) 01:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- In her case, probably both. 24.184.206.22 (talk) 03:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- So sad that this obviously biased judge is even a judge. Incompetent or corrupt. Which is better? Stupid or lying. Which is better? 2001:56B:9FED:B65C:484:1303:C156:2D9F (talk) 18:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- In her case, probably both. 24.184.206.22 (talk) 03:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 May 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change
The hearing featured five judicial nominees, with Republican senators focused on questioning J. Philip Calabrese and Democratic senators focused on questioning Toby Crouse> Afterward Democratic senators sent Cannon many follow-up questions to answer.[14][21]
to
The hearing featured five judicial nominees, with Republican senators focused on questioning J. Philip Calabrese and Democratic senators focused on questioning Toby Crouse. Afterward Democratic senators sent Cannon many follow-up questions to answer.[14][21]
(Replace > by .) Quantum menace (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done Jamedeus (talk) 22:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Broken ref
Heads up that ref 106 is currently broken 104.232.119.107 (talk) 10:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done Many thanks. If the orphan ref "hugo" was meant to be the same as that defined as "lowell" which quickly follows it (Lowell, Hugo; Joseph, Cameron (May 8, 2024). "Judge scraps date for Trump Mar-a-Lago documents trial without rescheduling". The Guardian. Retrieved May 8, 2024.), then I've fixed it. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 10:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class United States courts and judges articles
- Low-importance United States courts and judges articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Hispanic and Latino American articles
- Unknown-importance Hispanic and Latino American articles
- WikiProject Hispanic and Latino Americans articles
- WikiProject United States articles