Jump to content

Rajbanshi people: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Restoring revision as of 02:58, 12 May 2024 by Ekdalian
Tags: Undo Reverted
Undid revision 1223881047 by Chaipau (talk) This is not related to the removal discussed in talk page. That removal was undone. You have removed source, citation fixation basically you removed all my edits.
Line 26: Line 26:
{{Culture of Assam}}
{{Culture of Assam}}


The '''Rajbanshi''', also '''Rajbongshi''' and '''Koch-Rajbongshi''',<ref>"In West Bengal and Bihar, they are known as "Rajbongshi and "Rajbanshi", " in Assam as "Koch," and "Koch-Rajbongshi," and in [[Meghalaya]] mainly as "Koch." Though the community is known by diverse names in different states, their origin is the same, that is, "Koch." {{harvcol|Roy|2018}}</ref> are peoples from [[Lower Assam]], [[North Bengal]], eastern [[Bihar]], [[Terai]] region of eastern [[Nepal]], [[Rangpur division]] of North [[Bangladesh]] and [[Bhutan]]<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=http://wbnorthbengaldev.gov.in/|title=The Portal of North Bengal Development Department|website=wbnorthbengaldev.gov.in|access-date=28 April 2019}}</ref> who have in the past sought an association with the [[Koch dynasty]].<ref name="Ramirez-14"/> Koch-Rajbanshi people speak [[Kamatapuri lects|Kamatapuri]],{{cn|date=May 2024}} belong to [[Indo-Aryan languages]], though in the past they might have spoken [[Tibeto-Burman languages]]. The community is categorised as [[Other Backward Class|OBC]] in Assam and Bihar, and [[Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes|SC]] in West Bengal.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Das |first=Ruhi Tewari, Madhuparna |date=14 April 2021 |title=Who are Rajbanshis, caught in Shah-Mamata scrap & why they're key for BJP in Assam, Bengal |url=https://theprint.in/politics/who-are-rajbanshis-caught-in-shah-mamata-scrap-why-theyre-key-for-bjp-in-assam-bengal/639069/ |access-date=6 August 2023 |website=ThePrint |language=en-US}}</ref> In Nepal they are considered part of the Plains Janjati. In Bangladesh the community is classified as Plains ethnic group under 'Barman'. They are the largest Scheduled Caste community of West Bengal.<ref>{{Cite web |date=17 March 2021 |title=The Significance Of Matuas and Rajbanshis in West Bengal Poll Battle, Explained |url=https://www.news18.com/news/politics/the-significance-of-matuas-and-rajbanshis-in-west-bengal-poll-battle-explained-3544697.html |access-date=6 August 2023 |website=News18 |language=en}}</ref>
The '''Rajbanshi''', also '''Rajbongshi''' and '''Koch-Rajbongshi''',<ref>"In West Bengal and Bihar, they are known as "Rajbongshi and "Rajbanshi", " in Assam as "Koch," and "Koch-Rajbongshi," and in [[Meghalaya]] mainly as "Koch." Though the community is known by diverse names in different states, their origin is the same, that is, "Koch." {{harvcol|Roy|2018}}</ref> are peoples from [[Lower Assam]], [[North Bengal]], eastern [[Bihar]], [[Terai]] region of eastern [[Nepal]], [[Rangpur division]] of North [[Bangladesh]] and [[Bhutan]]<ref>"The Rajbanshi as a social and cultural group are well-known to historians, sociologists and anthropologists working on northeast India. They are also familiar to those who focus on the issues surrounding minorities and indigenous groups (compare Berlie, 1982; Bessaignet, 1964; Shrestha, 2009; Wilson, 2012). A sizeable population, they are mostly concentrated in the northern parts of West Bengal and western Assam in India, in northwest Bangladesh, and the Jhapa and Morang Districts of Nepal. Although this article focuses primarily on those living in northeast India, and despite variations identified in the anthropological literature, Rajbanshi inhabiting Nepal and Bangladesh (also Bhutan and Tibet) very likely share a common historical consciousness and folklore with theirIndian kin (Das, 2009)."{{harvcol|Wilson|Bashir|2016|p=457}}</ref> who have in the past sought an association with the [[Koch dynasty]].<ref name="Ramirez-14"/> Koch-Rajbanshi people speak [[Kamatapuri lects|Kamatapuri]],<ref>An early investigation of Rajbanshi language appears in the Linguistic Survey of India, published by Grierson during the colonial period...Accordingly, Das sees no value (beyond the political) in considering Rajbanshi (or Kamtapuri/Kamata, as it is also called) as a distinct dialect.{{harvcol|Wilson|Bashir|2016|p=460}}</ref> belong to [[Indo-Aryan languages]], though in the past they might have spoken [[Tibeto-Burman languages]]. The community is categorised as [[Other Backward Class|OBC]] in Assam and Bihar, and [[Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes|SC]] in West Bengal.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Das |first=Ruhi Tewari, Madhuparna |date=14 April 2021 |title=Who are Rajbanshis, caught in Shah-Mamata scrap & why they're key for BJP in Assam, Bengal |url=https://theprint.in/politics/who-are-rajbanshis-caught-in-shah-mamata-scrap-why-theyre-key-for-bjp-in-assam-bengal/639069/ |access-date=6 August 2023 |website=ThePrint |language=en-US}}</ref> In Nepal they are considered part of the Plains Janjati. In Bangladesh the community is classified as Plains ethnic group under 'Barman'. They are the largest Scheduled Caste community of West Bengal.<ref>{{Cite web |date=17 March 2021 |title=The Significance Of Matuas and Rajbanshis in West Bengal Poll Battle, Explained |url=https://www.news18.com/news/politics/the-significance-of-matuas-and-rajbanshis-in-west-bengal-poll-battle-explained-3544697.html |access-date=6 August 2023 |website=News18 |language=en}}</ref>


In 2020, [[Kamatapur Autonomous Council]] has been created for socio-economic development and political rights of Koch-Rajbongshi community residing in Assam.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://legislative.assam.gov.in/sites/default/files/swf_utility_folder/departments/legislative_medhassu_in_oid_3/menu/document/the_kamatapur_autonomous_council_act_2020.pdf |title=The Kamatapur Autonomous Council Act 2020 |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=19 October 2020 |publisher=Legislative Department |access-date=18 July 2022 |quote=An Act to provide for the establishment of an Administrative Authority in the name and style of the Kamatapur Autonomous Council and for matters incidental therein and connected therewith}}</ref>
In 2020, [[Kamatapur Autonomous Council]] has been created for socio-economic development and political rights of Koch-Rajbongshi community residing in Assam.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://legislative.assam.gov.in/sites/default/files/swf_utility_folder/departments/legislative_medhassu_in_oid_3/menu/document/the_kamatapur_autonomous_council_act_2020.pdf |title=The Kamatapur Autonomous Council Act 2020 |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=19 October 2020 |publisher=Legislative Department |access-date=18 July 2022 |quote=An Act to provide for the establishment of an Administrative Authority in the name and style of the Kamatapur Autonomous Council and for matters incidental therein and connected therewith}}</ref>
Line 33: Line 33:


== Etymology ==
== Etymology ==
The Rajbanshi (literal meaning: ''of the royal lineage'') community gave itself this name after 1891 following a movement to distance itself from an ethnic identity and acquire the higher social status of [[Kshatriya]] [[Varna (Hinduism)|Hindu varna]] instead.<ref>"From 1891 a section of the Koches were trying to dissociate themselves from their original ethnic stock by describing themselves as Rajbansis or Vratya Kshatriya (Bhanga Kshatriya) their movement ended with getting Kshatriya status, being known as Rajbansis and also enlisting themselves in the list of Scheduled Caste"{{harvcol|Das|2004|p=559}}</ref><ref>"In fact, the Koches in order to assert their royal lineage used to call themselves Rajbanshis. The term, Rajbanshi was also used as an effective nomenclature to subvert the processes of hierarchical subordination of the community largely by the caste Hindus during the colonial era." {{harvcol|Roy|2014}}</ref> The kshatriya identity was established by linking the community to the [[Koch dynasty]].<ref name="Ramirez-14">"(W)hile the asserted identity of the Koch/Rabha complex seemingly shifted a great deal during the colonial period—which is therefore very confusing for observers-some converts formed an assertive ethnic group, the Koch Rajbongshi (“of royal lineage"), that claimed to be linked to the Koch dynasty."{{harv|Ramirez|2014|p=17}}</ref> The Rajbanshis were officially recorded as Koch till the 1901 census.<ref>"The Rajbansi Movement gained new momentum during 1901, because in the census the Rajbansis were not treated as distinct caste separated from the Koches and they had not been given Kshatriya status. The district magistrate denied their demand. The Rajbansis were placed with the Koches in 1901 census."{{harvcol|Das|2004|p=560}}</ref> The name ''Rajbanshi'' is a 19th century [[neologism]].<ref>"But it is interesting to note that neither in the Persian records, nor in the foreign accounts, nor in any of the dynastic epigraphs of the time, the Koches are mentioned as Rajvamsis. Even the Darrang Raj Vamsavali, which is a genealogical account of the Koch royal family, and which was written in the last quarter of the 18th century, does not refer to this term. Instead all these sources call them as Koches and/or Meches."{{harv|Nath|1989|p=5}}</ref>
The Rajbanshi (literal meaning: ''of the royal lineage'') community gave itself this name after 1891 following a movement to distance itself from an ethnic identity and acquire the higher social status of [[Kshatriya]] [[Varna (Hinduism)|Hindu varna]] instead.<ref>"From 1891 a section of the Koches were trying to dissociate themselves from their original ethnic stock by describing themselves as Rajbansis or Vratya Kshatriya (Bhanga Kshatriya) their movement ended with getting Kshatriya status, being known as Rajbansis and also enlisting themselves in the list of Scheduled Caste"{{harvcol|Das|2004|p=559}}</ref><ref>"In fact, the Koches in order to assert their royal lineage used to call themselves Rajbanshis. The term, Rajbanshi was also used as an effective nomenclature to subvert the processes of hierarchical subordination of the community largely by the caste Hindus during the colonial era." {{harvcol|Roy|2014}}</ref> They tried to establish the Kshatriya identity by linking the community to the [[Koch dynasty]].<ref name="Ramirez-14">"(W)hile the asserted identity of the Koch/Rabha complex seemingly shifted a great deal during the colonial period—which is therefore very confusing for observers-some converts formed an assertive ethnic group, the Koch Rajbongshi (“of royal lineage"), that claimed to be linked to the Koch dynasty."{{harv|Ramirez|2014|p=17}}</ref> The Rajbanshis were officially recorded as Koch till the 1901 census.<ref>"The Rajbansi Movement gained new momentum during 1901, because in the census the Rajbansis were not treated as distinct caste separated from the Koches and they had not been given Kshatriya status. The district magistrate denied their demand. The Rajbansis were placed with the Koches in 1901 census."{{harvcol|Das|2004|p=560}}</ref> The name ''Rajbanshi'' is a 19th century [[neologism]].<ref>"But it is interesting to note that neither in the Persian records, nor in the foreign accounts, nor in any of the dynastic epigraphs of the time, the Koches are mentioned as Rajvamsis. Even the Darrang Raj Vamsavali, which is a genealogical account of the Koch royal family, and which was written in the last quarter of the 18th century, does not refer to this term. Instead all these sources call them as Koches and/or Meches."{{harv|Nath|1989|p=5}}</ref>


== Demography ==
== Demography ==
Line 42: Line 42:


==History==
==History==
In ancient times, the land which the Rajbanshi inhabit, called ''[[Kamarupa]]''. Its inhabitants spoke [[Tibeto-Burman languages]]. There is no mention of 'Rajbanshi' in Persian records, the [[Buranji|Ahom Buranji]]s or the 18th-century Darrang Raja Vamsavali: the genealogical records of the [[Cooch Behar State|Koch Bihar]] royal family, although there is mention of the Koch as a distinct social group.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Nandi |first=Rajib |date=24 June 2014 |title=Spectacles of Ethnographic and Historical Imaginations: Kamatapur Movement and the Rajbanshi Quest to Rediscover their Past and Selves |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2014.928776 |journal=History and Anthropology |volume=25 |issue=5 |pages=571–591 |doi=10.1080/02757206.2014.928776 |s2cid=144397875 |issn=0275-7206}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Wilson |first1=Margot |last2=Bashir |first2=Kamran |date=16 March 2016 |title='King's inheritors': understanding the ethnic discourse on the Rajbanshi as an indigenous community |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2016.1148594 |journal=Social Identities |volume=22 |issue=5 |pages=455–470 |doi=10.1080/13504630.2016.1148594 |s2cid=146814921 |issn=1350-4630}}</ref> From the 17th century the Koch society came under increasing brahminical influence and by the end of the 18th century a greater part of the Koch became amenable to it.<ref>"From the seventeenth century onward, however, the Koch society absorbed considerable Brahmanical content. Their claim to kshatriya status emerged as a way of reflecting and extending the new economic status of landed magnates that had arisen in the Koch society during Mughal rule. By the end of the eighteenth century this claim was filtering down the ranks of the Koch society and gaining an increasing acceptability (Ray 2002:50)."{{harvcol|Shin|2021|p=34}}</ref><ref>"So among the mass people, the process of Hinduization was slower than in the folds of the royal family"{{harvcol|Sheikh|2012|p= 252}}</ref>
In ancient times, the land which the Rajbanshi inhabit, called ''[[Kamarupa]]''. Its inhabitants spoke [[Tibeto-Burman languages]]. There is no mention of 'Rajbanshi' in Persian records, the [[Buranji|Ahom Buranji]]s or the 18th-century Darrang Raja Vamsavali: the genealogical records of the [[Cooch Behar State|Koch Bihar]] royal family, although there is mention of the Koch as a distinct social group.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Nandi |first=Rajib |date=24 June 2014 |title=Spectacles of Ethnographic and Historical Imaginations: Kamatapur Movement and the Rajbanshi Quest to Rediscover their Past and Selves |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2014.928776 |journal=History and Anthropology |volume=25 |issue=5 |pages=571–591 |doi=10.1080/02757206.2014.928776 |s2cid=144397875 |issn=0275-7206}}</ref><ref>{{harvcol|Wilson|Bashir|2016|p=459}}</ref> From the 17th century the Koch society came under increasing brahminical influence and by the end of the 18th century a greater part of the Koch became amenable to it.<ref>"From the seventeenth century onward, however, the Koch society absorbed considerable Brahmanical content. Their claim to kshatriya status emerged as a way of reflecting and extending the new economic status of landed magnates that had arisen in the Koch society during Mughal rule. By the end of the eighteenth century this claim was filtering down the ranks of the Koch society and gaining an increasing acceptability (Ray 2002:50)."{{harvcol|Shin|2021|p=34}}</ref><ref>"So among the mass people, the process of Hinduization was slower than in the folds of the royal family"{{harvcol|Sheikh|2012|p= 252}}</ref>


===Late 19th century and early 20th century===
===Late 19th century and early 20th century===
Line 126: Line 126:
* {{Cite journal |last=Sheikh |first=Amiruzzaman |title=The 16th century Koch kingdom: Evolving patterns of sankritization |year=2012 |journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress |volume=73 |pages=249–254 |jstor=44156212 |issn=2249-1937}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Sheikh |first=Amiruzzaman |title=The 16th century Koch kingdom: Evolving patterns of sankritization |year=2012 |journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress |volume=73 |pages=249–254 |jstor=44156212 |issn=2249-1937}}
*{{cite journal|last=Shin|first=Jae-Eun|title=Sword and Words: A Conflict Between Kings and Brahmins in the Bengal Frontier, Kāmatāpur 15th-16th Centuries|journal=Journal of the Directorate of Archaeology and Museums|year=2021|publisher=Government of West Bengal|volume=3|pages=21–36}}
*{{cite journal|last=Shin|first=Jae-Eun|title=Sword and Words: A Conflict Between Kings and Brahmins in the Bengal Frontier, Kāmatāpur 15th-16th Centuries|journal=Journal of the Directorate of Archaeology and Museums|year=2021|publisher=Government of West Bengal|volume=3|pages=21–36}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Wilson |first1=Margot |last2=Bashir |first2=Kamran |date=16 March 2016 |title='King's inheritors': understanding the ethnic discourse on the Rajbanshi as an indigenous community |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2016.1148594 |journal=Social Identities |volume=22 |issue=5 |pages=455–470 |doi=10.1080/13504630.2016.1148594 |s2cid=146814921 |issn=1350-4630}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Roy |first=Gautam chandra |date=9 July 2022 |title=Dynamics of Being Rajbanshi |others= Tribe to Caste and the Process of ‘Retribalisation’ |url=https://www.epw.in/journal/2022/28/commentary/dynamics-being-rajbanshi.html |journal=Economic and Political Weekly |language=en |volume=57 |issue=28 |url-access=subscription}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Roy |first=Gautam chandra |date=9 July 2022 |title=Dynamics of Being Rajbanshi |others= Tribe to Caste and the Process of ‘Retribalisation’ |url=https://www.epw.in/journal/2022/28/commentary/dynamics-being-rajbanshi.html |journal=Economic and Political Weekly |language=en |volume=57 |issue=28 |url-access=subscription}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}

Revision as of 01:19, 15 May 2024

Not to be confused with Koch people or Koch (caste).

Rajbanshi
Rajbanshi women dancing in Assam, India
Regions with significant populations
 India:
           Assam
7,021,254 (2011)[1][2]
           West Bengal3,983,316 (2011)[2][3][1][4]
           Bihar290,079 (2023)[5]
   Nepal127,985 (2021)[6]
 Bangladesh13,193 (2022)[7]
Languages
Rajbanshi, Assamese, Bengali, Nepali
Religion
Hinduism
Related ethnic groups
Koch, Rabhas, Garos, Boros, Mech, Tharu other Indo-Aryan people
Part of a series on the
Culture of Assam
History
Proto-historic
Classical
Medieval
Modern
People
Languages
Major
Minor
Extinct
Traditions
Mythology and folklore
Cuisine
Festivals
Religion
Major
Others
Art
Literature
History
Archives
Genres
Institutions
Awards
Music and performing arts
Media
Monuments
Symbols
Organisations

The Rajbanshi, also Rajbongshi and Koch-Rajbongshi,[11] are peoples from Lower Assam, North Bengal, eastern Bihar, Terai region of eastern Nepal, Rangpur division of North Bangladesh and Bhutan[12] who have in the past sought an association with the Koch dynasty.[13] Koch-Rajbanshi people speak Kamatapuri,[14] belong to Indo-Aryan languages, though in the past they might have spoken Tibeto-Burman languages. The community is categorised as OBC in Assam and Bihar, and SC in West Bengal.[15] In Nepal they are considered part of the Plains Janjati. In Bangladesh the community is classified as Plains ethnic group under 'Barman'. They are the largest Scheduled Caste community of West Bengal.[16]

In 2020, Kamatapur Autonomous Council has been created for socio-economic development and political rights of Koch-Rajbongshi community residing in Assam.[17]

They are related to the ethnic Koch people found in Meghalaya but are distinguished from them as well as from the Hindu caste called Koch in Upper Assam that receives converts from different tribes.[18] Rajbanshi (of royal lineage) alludes to the community's claimed connection with the Koch dynasty.[13]

Etymology

The Rajbanshi (literal meaning: of the royal lineage) community gave itself this name after 1891 following a movement to distance itself from an ethnic identity and acquire the higher social status of Kshatriya Hindu varna instead.[19][20] They tried to establish the Kshatriya identity by linking the community to the Koch dynasty.[13] The Rajbanshis were officially recorded as Koch till the 1901 census.[21] The name Rajbanshi is a 19th century neologism.[22]

Demography

Map of North Bengal Region of West Bengal, India

Worldwide, there are an estimated 11-12 million Rajbanshi people.[23] According to 1971 Census figures, 80% of the North Bengal population was once of the Rajbanshi community.[citation needed] As per as last late 2011 census, It has been estimated that it have came down to just mere 30%. The un-checked infiltration along the Indo-Bangladesh border and intrusion of Biharis caused a lot of demographic change over time. Population of Bengali Muslims, Bihari Muslims and Bangladeshi low-caste Namasudras have increased rapidly in areas like Jalpaiguri, Oodlabari, Gairkata and Jaigaon over the last 50 years, hence causing demographic changes over time.[24] In Bangladesh, the majority of Hindus in Rangpur division are from the community, although there are still some in Mymensingh division and Bogra district of Rajshahi division.

History

In ancient times, the land which the Rajbanshi inhabit, called Kamarupa. Its inhabitants spoke Tibeto-Burman languages. There is no mention of 'Rajbanshi' in Persian records, the Ahom Buranjis or the 18th-century Darrang Raja Vamsavali: the genealogical records of the Koch Bihar royal family, although there is mention of the Koch as a distinct social group.[25][26] From the 17th century the Koch society came under increasing brahminical influence and by the end of the 18th century a greater part of the Koch became amenable to it.[27][28]

Late 19th century and early 20th century

Rajbongshi Aboriginal from Behar, c. 1868

Starting from 1872 to 1891, in a series of social movements,[29] a section of Koch who were at tribal or semi-tribal form in present North Bengal and Western Assam in an effort to promote themselves up the caste hierarchy tried to dissociate themselves from their ethnic identity by describing themselves as Rajbanshi (of the royal lineage).[30] This attempt of social upliftment was a reaction against the ill treatment and humiliation faced by the community from the caste Hindus who referred to the Koch as mleccha or barbarians.[31][32] The term Rajbanshi was used to connect the group with Koch royalty who called themselves Shiva-banshi or Rajbanshi under Biswa Singha, the founder of the Koch dynasty and a tribal who was Hinduised and promoted to Kshatriya varna in the early 1500s.[33][34][35]

By 1891, the Koch who came to be known as Rajbanshi claimed a new status of Bhanga Kshatriya to proof themselves to be a provincial variety of the Kshatriyas, the movement of Bhanga Kshatriya was undertaken by Harimohan Ray Khajanchi who established the "Rangpur Bratya Kshatriya Jatir Unnati Bidhayani Sabha" for the upward mobility of the community in the Hindu society.[36]

To justify this, the group collected reference from Hindu religious text such as the Kalika Purana, Yogini Tantra etc[37] and created legends that they originally belonged to the kshatriya varna but left their homeland in the fear of annihilation by the brahmin sage Parashurama and took refuge in Paundradesh (currently in Northern bengal and Rangpur division of Bangladesh) and later came to be known as Bhanga Kshatriyas.[38][39] The story so created was to provide a convincing myth to assert their Kshatriya origin and perform as an ideological base for the movement[40][41] but this failed to make any wider effect on the community and were denied the Kshatriya status.[42]

In 1910, the Rajbanshi who were classified as the member of the same caste as the Koches claimed a new identity of Rajbanshi Kshatriya, this time under the leadership of Panchanan Barma who established the Kshatriya Samiti in Rangpur, it separated the Rajbanshis from their Koch identity and was also successful in getting the Kshatriya status[43] after getting recognition from different Brahmin pandits of Mithila, Rangpur, Kamrup and Koch Bihar.[44] Following this, the district magistrate gave permission to use surnames like Roy, Ray, Barman, Sinha, Adhikary etc. to replace the older traditional surnames like Sarkar, Ghosh, Das or Mandal[45] and the Kshatriya status was granted in the final report of 1911 census.[44] The movement manifested itself in sankritising tendencies with an assertion of Aryan origin and striving for higher social status by imitating higher caste customs and rituals.[46]

With this lakhs of Rajbanshi took ritual bath in the Karatoya river and adopted the practices of the twice born (Dvija), like the wearing of the sacred thread (Upanayana), adoption of gotra name, shortening in period of 'asauch' from 30 days to 12.[47][48] They gave up practices that were forbidden in the Hindu religion like the drinking of liquor (Teetotalism) and rearing of pigs.[49] From 1872 to 1911 in an effort to be a part of the higher caste, the Koch went through three distinct social identities in the census, Koch to Rajbanshi (1872), Rajbanshi to Bhanga Kshatriya (1891), Bhanga Kshatriya to Rajbanshi Kshatriya (1911).[50]

Today the Koch-Rajbongshis are found throughout North Bengal, particularly in the Dooars, as well as parts of Lower Assam, northern Bangladesh (Rangpur Division), the Terai of eastern Nepal and Bihar, and Bhutan.[51]

Some writers suggest that the Rajbanshi people constitute from different ethnic groups[52][53][54] who underwent Sankritisation to reach the present form and in the process abandoned their original Tibeto-burman tongue to be replaced by the Indo-Aryan languages.[55] There exist Rajbanshi people in South Bengal districts of Midnapur, 24 Paraganas, Hoogly and Nadia who might not belong to the same ethnic stock.[56][57]

In 1937, various members of the Rajbanshi Kshatriya Samiti were elected to the Bengal Legislative Council from Rangpur, Dinajpur, Malda, and Jalpaiguri. These MLAs helped form the Independent Scheduled Caste Party. Upendra Nath Barman became a minister-in-charge of forests and excise in the Fazlul Haq government. However, the reservations provided to them also increased conflict within organisations representing Scheduled Castes, and many leaders of the Kshatriya Samiti left for the Congress party, while much of the masses were drawn to the Communists. In 1946, several Rajbanshi candidates were elected on reserved seats from North Bengal, with only one Rajbanshi candidate from the Kshatriya Samiti and Communist Party being elected. This division of Rajbanshi leadership meant they were in little position to have a say in the Partition of Bengal, although Namasudra Community leader Jogendra Nath Mandal attempted to organise lower castes against Partition.

Post-independence (1947–present)

After Partition, the Kshatriya Samithi lost its headquarters at Rangpur and attempted to reestablish itself at Dinhata. However, a variety of new organisations to represent the Rajbanshi were being created. In Assam, the Rajbanshis were classified in a special category of OBC called MOBC. In North Bengal, the various new Rajbanshi organisations began to see the Rajbanshi identity as ethnolinguistic in nature rather than a caste, since the various other communities living in North Bengal and Lower Assam also spoke the Rajbanshi language. This linguistic awareness was heightened in 1953, when the government decided to reorganise the states on linguistic basis. Many of these organisations, such as Siliguri Zonal Rajbanshi Kshatriya Samiti agitated for the merger of Purnia division of Bihar and Goalpara district of Assam into West Bengal since these regions were largely populated by Rajbanshi speakers. This was continued into the 1960s with Rajbanshi activists frequently demanding for their speech to be recognised as separate from Bengali.[58]

Occupation

The Rajbongshis were traditionally agriculturalists, but due to their numerical dominance in North Bengal there were significant occupational differences among them. Most were agricultural labourers (halua) or sharecroppers (adhiar). These often worked for landed cultivators, called dar-chukanidars. Above them were the chukandiars and jotedars, and at the top were the zamindars. Some Rajbongshis were zamindars or jotedars.[59]

Lifestyle and culture

According to a 2019 research, the Koch Rajbongshi community has an oral tradition of agriculture, dance, music, medical practices, song, the building of house, culture, and language. Ideally the tribe transfer the know-how from one generation to another.[60]

Music forms are integral part of Koch-Rajbongshi culture. The main musical forms of Koch-Rajbongshi culture are Bhawaiyya, Chatka, Chorchunni, Palatia, Lahankari, Tukkhya, Bishohora Pala among many others. Various instruments are used for such performances, string instruments like Dotora, Sarindra and Bena, double-membrane instruments like Tasi, Dhak, Khol, Desi Dhol and Mridanga, gongs and bells like Kansi, Khartal and wind instruments like Sanai, Mukha bansi and Kupa bansi.[61]

Rajbanshi people in Nepal

The 2011 Nepal census classifies the Rajbanshi people within the broader social group of Terai Janajati.[62] At the time of the Nepal census of 2011, 115,242 people (0.4% of the population of Nepal) were Rajbanshi. The frequency of Rajbanshi people by province was as follows:

The frequency of Rajbanshi people was higher than national average (0.4%) in the following districts:[63]

Notable people

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b "Who are Rajbanshis, caught in Shah-Mamata scrap & why they're key for BJP in Assam, Bengal". 14 April 2021.
  2. ^ a b "Tribal Development Department, Government of West Bengal".
  3. ^ "Matuas & Rajbanshis of Bengal both want CAA. So, why did one vote for BJP & not the other?". 4 May 2021.
  4. ^ "West Bengal - Data Highlights: The Scheduled Castes -Census of India 2001" (PDF). censusindia.gov.in. Retrieved 17 August 2020.
  5. ^ Verma, Ritesh (3 November 2023). "Bihar Caste Wise Population Share Full List: बिहार में किस जाति की कितनी संख्या, आबादी में कितना प्रतिशत हिस्सेदारी". Hindustan (in Hindi). Retrieved 6 November 2023.
  6. ^ National Statistics Office (2021). National Population and Housing Census 2021, Caste/Ethnicity Report. Government of Nepal (Report).
  7. ^ "Table 1.4 Ethnic Population by Group and Sex" (PDF). Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. 2021. p. 33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 March 2023. Retrieved 22 November 2022.
  8. ^ "639 Identifier Documentation: aho – ISO 639-3". SIL International (formerly known as the Summer Institute of Linguistics). SIL International. Retrieved 29 June 2019. Ahom [aho]
  9. ^ "Population by Religious Communities". Census India – 2001. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Retrieved 1 July 2019. Census Data Finder/C Series/Population by Religious Communities
  10. ^ "Population by religion community – 2011". Census of India, 2011. The Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Archived from the original on 25 August 2015. 2011census/C-01/DDW00C-01 MDDS.XLS
  11. ^ "In West Bengal and Bihar, they are known as "Rajbongshi and "Rajbanshi", " in Assam as "Koch," and "Koch-Rajbongshi," and in Meghalaya mainly as "Koch." Though the community is known by diverse names in different states, their origin is the same, that is, "Koch." (Roy 2018)
  12. ^ "The Rajbanshi as a social and cultural group are well-known to historians, sociologists and anthropologists working on northeast India. They are also familiar to those who focus on the issues surrounding minorities and indigenous groups (compare Berlie, 1982; Bessaignet, 1964; Shrestha, 2009; Wilson, 2012). A sizeable population, they are mostly concentrated in the northern parts of West Bengal and western Assam in India, in northwest Bangladesh, and the Jhapa and Morang Districts of Nepal. Although this article focuses primarily on those living in northeast India, and despite variations identified in the anthropological literature, Rajbanshi inhabiting Nepal and Bangladesh (also Bhutan and Tibet) very likely share a common historical consciousness and folklore with theirIndian kin (Das, 2009)."(Wilson & Bashir 2016:457)
  13. ^ a b c "(W)hile the asserted identity of the Koch/Rabha complex seemingly shifted a great deal during the colonial period—which is therefore very confusing for observers-some converts formed an assertive ethnic group, the Koch Rajbongshi (“of royal lineage"), that claimed to be linked to the Koch dynasty."(Ramirez 2014, p. 17)
  14. ^ An early investigation of Rajbanshi language appears in the Linguistic Survey of India, published by Grierson during the colonial period...Accordingly, Das sees no value (beyond the political) in considering Rajbanshi (or Kamtapuri/Kamata, as it is also called) as a distinct dialect.(Wilson & Bashir 2016:460)
  15. ^ Das, Ruhi Tewari, Madhuparna (14 April 2021). "Who are Rajbanshis, caught in Shah-Mamata scrap & why they're key for BJP in Assam, Bengal". ThePrint. Retrieved 6 August 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. ^ "The Significance Of Matuas and Rajbanshis in West Bengal Poll Battle, Explained". News18. 17 March 2021. Retrieved 6 August 2023.
  17. ^ "The Kamatapur Autonomous Council Act 2020" (PDF). Legislative Department. 19 October 2020. Retrieved 18 July 2022. An Act to provide for the establishment of an Administrative Authority in the name and style of the Kamatapur Autonomous Council and for matters incidental therein and connected therewith
  18. ^ "The Koch of western Meghalaya also claim relationship with those empire-building Koch. On the other hand, Koch is known as a Hindu caste found all over the Brahmaputra Valley (Majumdar 1984: 147), and receives converts to Hinduism from different tribes (Gait 1933: 43)." (Kondakov 2013:4)
  19. ^ "From 1891 a section of the Koches were trying to dissociate themselves from their original ethnic stock by describing themselves as Rajbansis or Vratya Kshatriya (Bhanga Kshatriya) their movement ended with getting Kshatriya status, being known as Rajbansis and also enlisting themselves in the list of Scheduled Caste"(Das 2004:559)
  20. ^ "In fact, the Koches in order to assert their royal lineage used to call themselves Rajbanshis. The term, Rajbanshi was also used as an effective nomenclature to subvert the processes of hierarchical subordination of the community largely by the caste Hindus during the colonial era." (Roy 2014)
  21. ^ "The Rajbansi Movement gained new momentum during 1901, because in the census the Rajbansis were not treated as distinct caste separated from the Koches and they had not been given Kshatriya status. The district magistrate denied their demand. The Rajbansis were placed with the Koches in 1901 census."(Das 2004:560)
  22. ^ "But it is interesting to note that neither in the Persian records, nor in the foreign accounts, nor in any of the dynastic epigraphs of the time, the Koches are mentioned as Rajvamsis. Even the Darrang Raj Vamsavali, which is a genealogical account of the Koch royal family, and which was written in the last quarter of the 18th century, does not refer to this term. Instead all these sources call them as Koches and/or Meches."(Nath 1989, p. 5)
  23. ^ Balachandran, Vappala (13 February 2021). "The Koch-Rajbongshi Conundrum And The 2021 Elections". Outlook India.
  24. ^ "Everyone's wooing Rajbanshis in North Bengal". The Times of India. 4 May 2016.
  25. ^ Nandi, Rajib (24 June 2014). "Spectacles of Ethnographic and Historical Imaginations: Kamatapur Movement and the Rajbanshi Quest to Rediscover their Past and Selves". History and Anthropology. 25 (5): 571–591. doi:10.1080/02757206.2014.928776. ISSN 0275-7206. S2CID 144397875.
  26. ^ (Wilson & Bashir 2016:459)
  27. ^ "From the seventeenth century onward, however, the Koch society absorbed considerable Brahmanical content. Their claim to kshatriya status emerged as a way of reflecting and extending the new economic status of landed magnates that had arisen in the Koch society during Mughal rule. By the end of the eighteenth century this claim was filtering down the ranks of the Koch society and gaining an increasing acceptability (Ray 2002:50)."(Shin 2021:34)
  28. ^ "So among the mass people, the process of Hinduization was slower than in the folds of the royal family"(Sheikh 2012:252)
  29. ^ "The social movement of the Rajbanshis is a historical fact. During the Census of 1872, the Rajbanshis of Bengal and some part of Assam were trying to dissociate themselves from the tribal Koches and frantically dependent entry in the Census as a distinct caste i.e "Rajbanshi".(Adhikary 2009:309)
  30. ^ "In 1901, many Koches in North Bengal were returned as Rajbanshis. Many of the Rajbanshis have taken sacred thread and were prepared to use force in support of their claim to be returned as Kshatriya. He also writes "No part of the Census in 1891, 1901, 1911 aroused so much excitement as the return of caste which caused a great deal heart burning and in some were returned as kshatriya quarters with threats of disturbance of the peace. The Rajbanshis claimed to be included as Kshatriya, Bratya kshatriya, Barua kshatriya"(Adhikary 2009:65)
  31. ^ "The immigrants with a strong awareness to caste started interacting with indigenous Rajbanshis [Koch] in differential terms. There are numerous instances of humiliation and objectionable identities of the Rajbanshis by the other caste immigrant. Few such instances of racialism interpretation and social suppression are Nagendra Nath Basu in the early twentieth century while writing his World Encyclopedia (Biswakosh) mentioned the Rajbanshis as barbarians or mlechha and Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyaya in Bango Dar shan moots that the Koch identity."(Adhikary 2009:163)
  32. ^ The Rajbanshis also faced humiliation and objectionable identification by the caste Hindus. Few such instances of racial misinterpretation and social suppression are: Nagendranath Basu in the early twentieth century while writing his Vishwakosh (World Encyclopedia) mentioned the Rajbanshis as barbarians or (Mlechha) and Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay in Bongo Darshan moots that the Koch identity cannot be synonymous with Bengali Hindu identity. The Ranjbanshis were even denied entry into the temple of Jagannath Puri by an Act of the government in the year 1911."(Hazarika 2009:277)
  33. ^ "So among the mass people the process of Hinduization was slower than in the folds of the royal family. With the embracing of Hinduism, they were left with a somewhat despised name 'Koch' and adopted the name Rajbansi, a Kshatriya status which means literally 'of royal race', confined predominantly within the cultivators and the respectable classes"(Sheikh 2012:252)
  34. ^ (Sheikh 2012, p. 250):"But it is surmised this was nothing but Sanscritization of the ruling family which spread the Brahminical ideas among the tribes to bring them under the pale of Hinduism. The king Biswa Singha with his tribal origin embraced Hinduism and claim Kshatriya status. He is also known as Bishu succeeded in establishing his authority, styling himself as Raja, he first claimed Rajbanshi Kshatriya status"
  35. ^ "As both royal families call themselves Sivabangshi, so the mass of the Koches call themselves Rajbanshis as commented with royal families"(Adhikary 2009:63–64)
  36. ^ "No part of the Census in 1891, 1901, 1911 aroused so much excitement as the return of caste which caused a great deal heart burning and in some were returned as kshatriya quarters with threats of disturbance of the peace. The Rajbanshis claimed to be included as Kshatriya, Bratya kshatriya, Barua kshatriya"(Adhikary 2009:65)
  37. ^ "The Rajbanshis also used the reference of Yoginitantra, Kalika Purana, and Bhramari Tantra to establish their claim as Bratya Kshatriya or Bhanga Kshatriya."(Adhikary 2009:309)
  38. ^ "The Rajbanshis [Koch] claimed that they were originally to the kshatriya varna and left their original homeland and took shelter in a region called Paundradesh corresponding to the districts of Rangpur, Dinajpur, Bogra, and the adjacent areas in fear of annihilation of Parasurama, a Brahman sage. In order to hide their kshatriyas identity they gave up their sacred thread and started living with the local people and gradually came to be known as the Bhanga Kshatriyas or the fallen kshatriyas."(Adhikary 2009:167–168)
  39. ^ " As both royal families call themselves Sivabangshi, so the mass of the Koches call themselves Rajbanshis as commented with royal families. Some of the Rajbanshis are now trying to prove that they are descendants of the Kshatriyas, who have taken shelter in North Bengal, being pursued by a Brahman hero Parsu Ram who extirpated the kshatriyas from the earth twenty one times. Some of them still call themselves Bhanga Kshatriyas."(Adhikary 2009:63–64)
  40. ^ "Though there are certain differences in these three accounts, the common thread that binds all of them together is the effort to create a convincing myth to provide their Kshatriya origin."(Adhikary 2009, p. 168)
  41. ^ "The claim to Kshatriya varna status through reinvention of some mythic tales provided some credibility to the ideological foundation of the Rajbanshi movement"(Roy 2014)
  42. ^ (Adhikary 2009:311)
  43. ^ "The Kshatriya samiti also had some other objectives to fulfill. It intended first, to separate the Koch and the Rajbanshi identity emphasizing the superior status of the latter; second, to legitimize the demand to include the Rajbanshis within the Kshatriya caste; third, to inculcate brahmanical values and practices among the Rajbanshis"(Hazarika 2009:277)
  44. ^ a b Das 2004, p. 560.
  45. ^ Adhikary 2009, pp. 169–170.
  46. ^ Das 2004, p. 561.
  47. ^ "At the initial stage, the Rajbanshis [Koch] caste leaders typically attempted to improve their social standing by altering their customs to resemble the ways of life of 'twice- born'. As a formal work of 'twice born' they started wearing sacred thread and adopted gotra (clan) name. They also reduced the period of mourning and ritual pollution (as ouch) from thirty to twelve days to corresponding with that of the kshatriya."(Adhikary 2009, p. 169)
  48. ^ " In order to gratify their ritual rank aspiration they began to imitate the values, practices and cultural styles of ‘twice born’ castes that formed a part of Hindu Great tradition. Since 1912, a number of mass thread wearing ceremonies (Milan Kshetra) were organized in different districts by the ‘Kshatriya Samiti’ where lakhs of Rajbanshi's donned the sacred thread as a mark of Kshatriya status."(Hazarika 2009:277)
  49. ^ Adhikary 2009, p. 170.
  50. ^ "In their desire to be recorded as a member of high caste, they passed through at least four distinct social identities from one census to another i.e. from Koch to Rajbanshi (1872 A.D.), from Rajbanshi to Bratya/ Bhanga Kshatriya(1891), from Bratya/Bhanga Kshatriya· to Rajbanshi Kshatriya (1901,1911,1921 A.D.) and from Rajbanshi Kshatriya to only Kshatriya."(Adhikary 2009:312)
  51. ^ "Today, the Koch Rajbanshi people are located in North Bengal, Assam (with a major concentration in west Assam), Garo hills of Meghalaya, Purnia, Kishanganj, and Katihar districts of Bihar, Jhapa and Biratnagar districts of Nepal, Rangpur, East Dinajpur districts and some parts of northwest Mymensingh, northern Rajshahi and Bogra districts of Bangladesh and lower parts of Bhutan (Nalini Ranjan Ray 2009)." (Roy 2014)
  52. ^ Roy (2014):"Suniti Kumar Chatterji observed that Rajbanshis were Koch in origin and belonged to the larger Bodo group. They were Hinduised or semi-Hinduised and had discarded their Tibeto-Burman language, adopting northern Bengali sub-language as their tongue."
  53. ^ Das, Mukherjee & Bhattacharjee (1967), p. 433: "And the various ethnological reports concur on the origin of the Rajbanshi from the Koch, the Mech and the Paliya tribes"
  54. ^ "The large tract of country called Mechpara in the Gowalparah District no doubt took its name from them, and the proprietor is a Mech; but he and most of his people repudiate this origin and call themselves Rajbangsis"(Mitra 1953:224)
  55. ^ Debnath, Monojit; Palanichamy, Malliya G.; Mitra, Bikash; Jin, Jie-Qiong; Chaudhuri, Tapas K.; Zhang, Ya-Ping (2011). "Y-chromosome haplogroup diversity in the sub-Himalayan Terai and Duars populations of East India". Journal of Human Genetics. 56 (11): 765–771. doi:10.1038/jhg.2011.98. ISSN 1435-232X. PMID 21900945. S2CID 2735604.
  56. ^ "On the other hand, there are Rajbanshi in Midnapur, 24 Paraganas, Hoogly and Nadia district who may not be of the same stock and do not speak this language"(Adhikary 2009:138)
  57. ^ "Thompson states, "The Rajbanshis are the indigenous people of Northern Bengal and the third Largest Hindu Caste in the province. Their total number has been exaggerated by the fact that a member of fisherman caste in Mymensingh, Nadia and Murshidabad returned themselves as Rajbanshis."(Adhikary 2009:65)
  58. ^ Barman, Rup Kumar (2015). "Culture of Difference in Ethnic Identity: A new Look on the transition of Caste identity into Cultural identity of the Rajbanshis of Northern Bengal and Lower Assam" (PDF). The Mirror. 2: 56–69.
  59. ^ Barman, Rup Kumar. "A new Look on the transition of Caste identity into Cultural identity of the Rajbanshis of Northern Bengal and Lower Assam" (PDF). The Mirror: 56–70.
  60. ^ Singha, Surjit; Singha, Ranjit (2019). Sustainable Entrepreneurship in North East India (1 ed.). Bulgaria: Tsenov Academic Publishing House. pp. 161–187. ISBN 9789542317524. Retrieved 14 November 2019.
  61. ^ Sanyal, Charu Chandra (1965). The Rajbansis of North Bengal. Calcutta: The Asiatic Society.
  62. ^ Population Monograph of Nepal, Volume II
  63. ^ 2011 Nepal Census, District Level Detail Report

References

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Rajbanshi_people&oldid=1223899099"