Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Adding nominator information |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| colspan="3" | '''6.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: <!-- Images. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). --> |
| colspan="3" | '''6.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: <!-- Images. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). --> |
||
<!-- Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content. --> |
<!-- Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content. --> |
||
{{GATable/item|6a| |
{{GATable/item|6a|pass| |
||
}} |
}} |
||
<!-- Images are [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Pertinence and encyclopedic nature|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[Wikipedia:CAP|suitable captions]]. --> |
<!-- Images are [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Pertinence and encyclopedic nature|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[Wikipedia:CAP|suitable captions]]. --> |
||
{{GATable/item|6b| |
{{GATable/item|6b|pass| |
||
}} |
}} |
||
<!-- Overall. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). --> |
<!-- Overall. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). --> |
||
Revision as of 01:02, 15 May 2024
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 09:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 00:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I am excited to review this article.
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | |
|
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
|
7. Overall assessment. | |