Jump to content

Talk:Insurgency in Balochistan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Insurgency in Balochistan/Archive 2. (BOT)
Line 27: Line 27:
|box-advert=yes
|box-advert=yes
}}
}}

== Orphaned references in [[:Insurgency in Balochistan]] ==

I check pages listed in [[:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting]] to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for [[User:AnomieBOT/docs/OrphanReferenceFixer|orphaned references]] in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of [[:Insurgency in Balochistan]]'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for ''this'' article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

<b>Reference named "stanford":</b><ul>
<li>From [[List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll]]: "[http://news.stanford.edu/pr/2011/pr-famine-040411.html How the U.S. saved a starving Soviet Russia: PBS film highlights Stanford scholar's research on the 1921–23 famine]", Stanford University. April 4, 2011.</li>
<li>From [[1970s operation in Balochistan]]: {{cite web|url=https://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/457|title=Baluch Liberation Front – Mapping Millitant Organisation|work=web.stanford.edu|access-date=1 December 2018}}</li>
<li>From [[Pakistani Taliban]]: {{cite news |url=https://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/105 |title=MAPPING MILITANT ORGANIZATIONS, Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan |publisher=Stanford.edu |access-date=2015-02-19 |date=13 December 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150219161809/https://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/105 |archive-date=19 February 2015 |url-status=live}}</li>
</ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<span style="color:#880">⚡</span>]] 14:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)


== What is the point of this Anglo propaganda? ==
== What is the point of this Anglo propaganda? ==

Revision as of 22:08, 8 June 2024

What is the point of this Anglo propaganda?

The article says: "Baloch separatists argue they are economically marginalised and poor compared to the rest of Pakistan. China has invested $46 billion in the region."

Then quote an Anglo news as a source and proceed to say nothing with nothing. What is the point of this propaganda? What do they want to imply with this traditional Machiavellian narrative?

Why doesn't the article say how much the Anglo empires "invested" or literally stole from this region in all their invasions and centuries of colonialism? Of course the "free" CIApedia does not allow editions...

TotallyHonestAnglo (talk) 00:14, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what precisely was "stolen" from Balochistan? Sand perhaps? — kashmīrī TALK 02:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
hello kashmiri , Oil and other minerals have been stolen from baluchistan including natural gas , a recent example is the reko diq mineral reserves. GamerHashaam (talk) 08:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Insurgency in Balochistan

Insurgency in Balochistan 223.123.115.154 (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LeB isn’t active anymore

The Lashkar-e-Balochistan group isn’t active anymore, it might have just been around in 2012 but it’s inactive currently. BLUF also probably isn’t active anymore. Please add these changes. Hammad4567 (talk) 19:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Related article (merge?)

Recently an article has been created: Baloch genocide. I don't know a lot about the topic, but it looks like it overlaps a lot with this article in explaining the history of the war, and a lot of it should probably be merged. Mrfoogles (talk) 15:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would not suggest merging this with that since This goes a lot back to 1948 and colonial era while the genocide article is from 2002-onwards.
Rather a Sectionon the Genocide could be added to this article. GamerHashaam (talk) 16:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]