Jump to content

Klefki: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reception: Image descirption; Artwork was made for the video games as far as I know.
Reception: Fix italics on ''X'' and ''Y''.
Line 29: Line 29:


==Reception==
==Reception==
Klefki's design received mixed reception, identified by writer Imran Khan as the go-to example of issues with modern Pokémon designs.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.fanbyte.com/lists/pokemon-snap-2-list |title=The Most Photogenic Pokémon We Want in the New Pokémon Snap |work=Fanbyte |last=Khan |first=Imran |date=July 13, 2023 |accessdate=December 30, 2023 |archive-date=July 25, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230725174146/https://www.fanbyte.com/lists/pokemon-snap-2-list|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[Video game journalism|Video game journalists]] regarded its design as among the worst of new Pokémon introduced in X and Y, characterizing the design as uninspired, insipid, strange, and an example of Game Freak's "creative bankruptcy".{{Efn|Attributed to multiple sources <ref name="auto">{{Cite web |date=October 4, 2013 |title=Klefki is a Pokemon that is a KEY RING. IT IS A KEY RING. |url=https://www.destructoid.com/klefki-is-a-pokemon-that-is-a-key-ring-it-is-a-key-ring/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210718150834/https://www.destructoid.com/klefki-is-a-pokemon-that-is-a-key-ring-it-is-a-key-ring/ |archive-date=July 18, 2021 |access-date=July 9, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2013/10/23/analyzing-the-new-pokemon-of-x-and-y.aspx?PostPageIndex=3|title=Analyzing The New Pokémon Of X & Y|magazine=[[Game Informer]] |access-date=2021-07-09|archive-date=2021-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709185018/https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2013/10/23/analyzing-the-new-pokemon-of-x-and-y.aspx?PostPageIndex=3|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gamesradar.com/pokemon-are-basically-just-ordinary-objects-googly-eyes/|title=14 Pokemon that are basically just ordinary objects with googly eyes|first=Brittany |last=Vincent |website=[[GamesRadar+]]|date=29 January 2014 |access-date=2021-07-09|archive-date=2021-07-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210711081743/https://www.gamesradar.com/pokemon-are-basically-just-ordinary-objects-googly-eyes/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://screenrant.com/worst-wtf-pokemon-designs-ever/|title=15 Worst Pokemon Designs Ever|date=December 7, 2016|website=ScreenRant|access-date=July 9, 2021|archive-date=July 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709185951/https://screenrant.com/worst-wtf-pokemon-designs-ever/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/comedy/pokemon/11-pokemon-that-prove-theyre-out-of-ideas/|title=13 Pokemon That Prove They're Out Of Ideas|first1= Hana |last1=Michels |first2=Asterios |last2=Kokkinos |date=February 11, 2016|website=[[Paste (magazine)|Paste]]|access-date=July 9, 2021|archive-date=July 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709190313/https://www.pastemagazine.com/comedy/pokemon/11-pokemon-that-prove-theyre-out-of-ideas/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Has Pokémon Run Out of Ideas? |url=http://www.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2013/10/14/has-pokmon-run-out-of-ideas |work=[[The Portland Mercury]] |last=Webber |first=Angela |date=2013-10-14 |accessdate=2014-03-03 |archive-date=2014-03-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140304034448/http://www.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2013/10/14/has-pokmon-run-out-of-ideas |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://es.ign.com/pokemon/142177/feature/los-peores-pokemon-de-cada-generacion |title=Los peores Pokémon de cada generación |work=[[IGN]] |last=Bailey |first=Kat |date=November 22, 2018 |accessdate=February 17, 2024 |archive-date=October 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231009192647/https://es.ign.com/pokemon/142177/feature/los-peores-pokemon-de-cada-generacion |url-status=live }}</ref>}} ''[[VentureBeat]]'' staff felt unsurprised by the concept behind the Pokémon, arguing that the team had run out of ideas.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Minotti |first=Mike |last2=Grubb |first2=Jeff |date=March 1, 2016 |title=20 years have produced some seriously ugly Pokémon |url=https://venturebeat.com/2016/02/29/20-years-have-produced-some-seriously-ugly-pokemon/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211102225715/https://venturebeat.com/2016/02/29/20-years-have-produced-some-seriously-ugly-pokemon/ |archive-date=November 2, 2021 |access-date=July 9, 2021}}</ref> It has also been regarded as one of the worst Pokémon in general, with ''[[IGN]]'' readers voting Klefki as one of the worst Pokémon from ''Pokémon X and Y''.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pocketgamer.com/articles/070856/the-7-worst-pokemon-ever/|title=The 7 worst Pokemon ever|first=Oscar|last=Dayus|website=Pocket Gamer|date=28 July 2016 |access-date=2021-07-09|archive-date=2021-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709183719/https://www.pocketgamer.com/articles/070856/the-7-worst-pokemon-ever/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.digitalspy.com/videogames/pokemon/a803638/20-worst-pokemon-designs-ever-ranked/|title=20 worst Pokémon designs ever, ranked|first=Sam|last=Loveridge|date=December 28, 2016|website=Digital Spy|access-date=July 9, 2021|archive-date=July 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709191427/https://www.digitalspy.com/videogames/pokemon/a803638/20-worst-pokemon-designs-ever-ranked/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Finnegan |first=Liz |date=February 26, 2016 |title=10 Worst Pokemon Designs |url=https://www.escapistmagazine.com/v2/10-worst-pokemon-designs/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210711031812/https://www.escapistmagazine.com/v2/10-worst-pokemon-designs/ |archive-date=July 11, 2021 |access-date=July 9, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Davis |first=Justin |date=26 November 2013 |title=The Best & Worst X/Y Pokemon Revealed |url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2013/11/26/the-best-worst-xy-pokemon-revealed |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210711142645/https://www.ign.com/articles/2013/11/26/the-best-worst-xy-pokemon-revealed |archive-date=2021-07-11 |access-date=2021-07-09}}</ref> Hayes Madsen of ''[[Screen Rant]]'' claimed that Klefki should never have been made, deriding it for being based on an object.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Madsen |first=Hayes |date=28 April 2020 |title=Pokemon: Klefki Shouldn't Have Been Made &#124; Screen Rant |url=https://screenrant.com/pokemon-klefki-shouldnt-been-made/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221217185714/https://screenrant.com/pokemon-klefki-shouldnt-been-made/ |archive-date=2022-12-17 |access-date=2021-07-09 |website=Screen Rant}}</ref>
Klefki's design received mixed reception, identified by writer Imran Khan as the go-to example of issues with modern Pokémon designs.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.fanbyte.com/lists/pokemon-snap-2-list |title=The Most Photogenic Pokémon We Want in the New Pokémon Snap |work=Fanbyte |last=Khan |first=Imran |date=July 13, 2023 |accessdate=December 30, 2023 |archive-date=July 25, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230725174146/https://www.fanbyte.com/lists/pokemon-snap-2-list|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[Video game journalism|Video game journalists]] regarded its design as among the worst of new Pokémon introduced in ''X'' and ''Y'', characterizing the design as uninspired, insipid, strange, and an example of Game Freak's "creative bankruptcy".{{Efn|Attributed to multiple sources <ref name="auto">{{Cite web |date=October 4, 2013 |title=Klefki is a Pokemon that is a KEY RING. IT IS A KEY RING. |url=https://www.destructoid.com/klefki-is-a-pokemon-that-is-a-key-ring-it-is-a-key-ring/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210718150834/https://www.destructoid.com/klefki-is-a-pokemon-that-is-a-key-ring-it-is-a-key-ring/ |archive-date=July 18, 2021 |access-date=July 9, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2013/10/23/analyzing-the-new-pokemon-of-x-and-y.aspx?PostPageIndex=3|title=Analyzing The New Pokémon Of X & Y|magazine=[[Game Informer]] |access-date=2021-07-09|archive-date=2021-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709185018/https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2013/10/23/analyzing-the-new-pokemon-of-x-and-y.aspx?PostPageIndex=3|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gamesradar.com/pokemon-are-basically-just-ordinary-objects-googly-eyes/|title=14 Pokemon that are basically just ordinary objects with googly eyes|first=Brittany |last=Vincent |website=[[GamesRadar+]]|date=29 January 2014 |access-date=2021-07-09|archive-date=2021-07-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210711081743/https://www.gamesradar.com/pokemon-are-basically-just-ordinary-objects-googly-eyes/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://screenrant.com/worst-wtf-pokemon-designs-ever/|title=15 Worst Pokemon Designs Ever|date=December 7, 2016|website=ScreenRant|access-date=July 9, 2021|archive-date=July 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709185951/https://screenrant.com/worst-wtf-pokemon-designs-ever/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/comedy/pokemon/11-pokemon-that-prove-theyre-out-of-ideas/|title=13 Pokemon That Prove They're Out Of Ideas|first1= Hana |last1=Michels |first2=Asterios |last2=Kokkinos |date=February 11, 2016|website=[[Paste (magazine)|Paste]]|access-date=July 9, 2021|archive-date=July 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709190313/https://www.pastemagazine.com/comedy/pokemon/11-pokemon-that-prove-theyre-out-of-ideas/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Has Pokémon Run Out of Ideas? |url=http://www.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2013/10/14/has-pokmon-run-out-of-ideas |work=[[The Portland Mercury]] |last=Webber |first=Angela |date=2013-10-14 |accessdate=2014-03-03 |archive-date=2014-03-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140304034448/http://www.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2013/10/14/has-pokmon-run-out-of-ideas |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://es.ign.com/pokemon/142177/feature/los-peores-pokemon-de-cada-generacion |title=Los peores Pokémon de cada generación |work=[[IGN]] |last=Bailey |first=Kat |date=November 22, 2018 |accessdate=February 17, 2024 |archive-date=October 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231009192647/https://es.ign.com/pokemon/142177/feature/los-peores-pokemon-de-cada-generacion |url-status=live }}</ref>}} ''[[VentureBeat]]'' staff felt unsurprised by the concept behind the Pokémon, arguing that the team had run out of ideas.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Minotti |first=Mike |last2=Grubb |first2=Jeff |date=March 1, 2016 |title=20 years have produced some seriously ugly Pokémon |url=https://venturebeat.com/2016/02/29/20-years-have-produced-some-seriously-ugly-pokemon/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211102225715/https://venturebeat.com/2016/02/29/20-years-have-produced-some-seriously-ugly-pokemon/ |archive-date=November 2, 2021 |access-date=July 9, 2021}}</ref> It has also been regarded as one of the worst Pokémon in general, with ''[[IGN]]'' readers voting Klefki as one of the worst Pokémon from ''Pokémon X'' and ''Y''.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pocketgamer.com/articles/070856/the-7-worst-pokemon-ever/|title=The 7 worst Pokemon ever|first=Oscar|last=Dayus|website=Pocket Gamer|date=28 July 2016 |access-date=2021-07-09|archive-date=2021-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709183719/https://www.pocketgamer.com/articles/070856/the-7-worst-pokemon-ever/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.digitalspy.com/videogames/pokemon/a803638/20-worst-pokemon-designs-ever-ranked/|title=20 worst Pokémon designs ever, ranked|first=Sam|last=Loveridge|date=December 28, 2016|website=Digital Spy|access-date=July 9, 2021|archive-date=July 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709191427/https://www.digitalspy.com/videogames/pokemon/a803638/20-worst-pokemon-designs-ever-ranked/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Finnegan |first=Liz |date=February 26, 2016 |title=10 Worst Pokemon Designs |url=https://www.escapistmagazine.com/v2/10-worst-pokemon-designs/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210711031812/https://www.escapistmagazine.com/v2/10-worst-pokemon-designs/ |archive-date=July 11, 2021 |access-date=July 9, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Davis |first=Justin |date=26 November 2013 |title=The Best & Worst X/Y Pokemon Revealed |url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2013/11/26/the-best-worst-xy-pokemon-revealed |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210711142645/https://www.ign.com/articles/2013/11/26/the-best-worst-xy-pokemon-revealed |archive-date=2021-07-11 |access-date=2021-07-09}}</ref> Hayes Madsen of ''[[Screen Rant]]'' claimed that Klefki should never have been made, deriding it for being based on an object.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Madsen |first=Hayes |date=28 April 2020 |title=Pokemon: Klefki Shouldn't Have Been Made &#124; Screen Rant |url=https://screenrant.com/pokemon-klefki-shouldnt-been-made/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221217185714/https://screenrant.com/pokemon-klefki-shouldnt-been-made/ |archive-date=2022-12-17 |access-date=2021-07-09 |website=Screen Rant}}</ref>
[[File:MagnemiteArtwork.png|thumb|Official artwork of Magnemite, which was frequently compared to Klefki due to various design aspects.]]
[[File:MagnemiteArtwork.png|thumb|Official artwork of Magnemite, which was frequently compared to Klefki due to various design aspects.]]
''[[Kotaku]]'' writer Zack Zwiezen, when he originally saw Klefki, assumed it was a fake design due to the strange premise behind its design. He discussed how people differentiate modern Pokémon designs from classic ones, namely how a common criticism is that classic designs were "all-natural looking creatures." He criticized this notion, citing an earlier design in the series, [[Magnemite]], as an example due to it being "screws and magnets." However, he digressed that Klefki may suggest that the designers were out of ideas and needed to take a break.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://kotaku.com/klefki-will-steal-your-keys-and-never-give-them-back-1836710679 |title=Klefki Will Steal Your Keys And Never Give Them Back |work=[[Kotaku]] |last=Zwiezen |first=Zack |date=July 27, 2019 |accessdate=February 16, 2024 |archive-date=February 18, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240218182025/https://kotaku.com/klefki-will-steal-your-keys-and-never-give-them-back-1836710679 |url-status=live }}</ref> ''Fanbyte'' writer James O'Connor similarly cited Magnemite as an example of early Pokémon designs being strange, but still found Klefki unsettling despite the precedence.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.fanbyte.com/legacy/the-most-disquieting-parts-of-pokemon-sun-and-moon |title=The Most Disquieting Parts of Pokemon Sun and Moon |work=Fanbyte |last=O'Connor |first=James |accessdate=February 16, 2024 |archive-date=May 4, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170504040018/https://www.zam.com/article/1258/the-most-disquieting-parts-of-pokemon-sun-and-moon |url-status=dead}}</ref> ''VGC's'' Jordan Middler, Chris Scullion, and Andy Robinson discussed Klefki in their podcast, citing its design as an example of ''Pokémon''<nowiki/>'s lack of design creativity as more games are released.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Middler |first=Jordan |last2=Scullion |first2=Chris |last3=Robinson |first3=Andy |date=2024-04-18 |title=Podcast: ‘Is Klefki the worst Pokemon?’ |url=https://www.videogameschronicle.com/blog/podcast/podcast-is-klefki-the-worst-pokemon/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240418174824/https://www.videogameschronicle.com/blog/podcast/podcast-is-klefki-the-worst-pokemon/ |archive-date=2024-04-18 |access-date=2024-04-19 |website=VGC |language=en-GB}}</ref> Other critics were more positive, with many other authors regarding it as one of their favorite Pokémon.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gamerevolution.com/features/615557-pokemon-sword-and-shield-pokedex-not-all-bad|title=The smaller Pokemon Sword and Shield Pokedex isn't all bad news|date=November 13, 2019|website=GameRevolution|access-date=July 9, 2021|archive-date=July 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709212745/https://www.gamerevolution.com/features/615557-pokemon-sword-and-shield-pokedex-not-all-bad|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.polygon.com/pokemon/2018/9/28/17855078/bulbasaur-best-starter-pokemon-gen-one|title=Bulbasaur has been the best Pokémon all along|first=Chris|last=Plante|date=September 28, 2018|website=Polygon|access-date=July 9, 2021|archive-date=September 28, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928130412/https://www.polygon.com/pokemon/2018/9/28/17855078/bulbasaur-best-starter-pokemon-gen-one|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2016/11/24/kyles-favorite-new-pokemon-of-sun-and-moon.aspx|title=Kyle's Favorite New Pokémon Of Sun & Moon|first=Kyle|last=Hilliard|magazine=Game Informer|access-date=2021-07-09|archive-date=2021-07-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210711031446/https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2016/11/24/kyles-favorite-new-pokemon-of-sun-and-moon.aspx|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2014/04/03/23-of-the-weirdest-pokemon.aspx|title=23 Of The Weirdest Pokémon|first=Kyle|last=Hilliard|magazine=Game Informer|access-date=2021-07-09|archive-date=2021-07-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210727104425/https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2014/04/03/23-of-the-weirdest-pokemon.aspx|url-status=live}}</ref>
''[[Kotaku]]'' writer Zack Zwiezen, when he originally saw Klefki, assumed it was a fake design due to the strange premise behind its design. He discussed how people differentiate modern Pokémon designs from classic ones, namely how a common criticism is that classic designs were "all-natural looking creatures." He criticized this notion, citing an earlier design in the series, [[Magnemite]], as an example due to it being "screws and magnets." However, he digressed that Klefki may suggest that the designers were out of ideas and needed to take a break.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://kotaku.com/klefki-will-steal-your-keys-and-never-give-them-back-1836710679 |title=Klefki Will Steal Your Keys And Never Give Them Back |work=[[Kotaku]] |last=Zwiezen |first=Zack |date=July 27, 2019 |accessdate=February 16, 2024 |archive-date=February 18, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240218182025/https://kotaku.com/klefki-will-steal-your-keys-and-never-give-them-back-1836710679 |url-status=live }}</ref> ''Fanbyte'' writer James O'Connor similarly cited Magnemite as an example of early Pokémon designs being strange, but still found Klefki unsettling despite the precedence.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.fanbyte.com/legacy/the-most-disquieting-parts-of-pokemon-sun-and-moon |title=The Most Disquieting Parts of Pokemon Sun and Moon |work=Fanbyte |last=O'Connor |first=James |accessdate=February 16, 2024 |archive-date=May 4, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170504040018/https://www.zam.com/article/1258/the-most-disquieting-parts-of-pokemon-sun-and-moon |url-status=dead}}</ref> ''VGC's'' Jordan Middler, Chris Scullion, and Andy Robinson discussed Klefki in their podcast, citing its design as an example of ''Pokémon''<nowiki/>'s lack of design creativity as more games are released.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Middler |first=Jordan |last2=Scullion |first2=Chris |last3=Robinson |first3=Andy |date=2024-04-18 |title=Podcast: ‘Is Klefki the worst Pokemon?’ |url=https://www.videogameschronicle.com/blog/podcast/podcast-is-klefki-the-worst-pokemon/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240418174824/https://www.videogameschronicle.com/blog/podcast/podcast-is-klefki-the-worst-pokemon/ |archive-date=2024-04-18 |access-date=2024-04-19 |website=VGC |language=en-GB}}</ref> Other critics were more positive, with many other authors regarding it as one of their favorite Pokémon.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.gamerevolution.com/features/615557-pokemon-sword-and-shield-pokedex-not-all-bad|title=The smaller Pokemon Sword and Shield Pokedex isn't all bad news|date=November 13, 2019|website=GameRevolution|access-date=July 9, 2021|archive-date=July 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709212745/https://www.gamerevolution.com/features/615557-pokemon-sword-and-shield-pokedex-not-all-bad|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.polygon.com/pokemon/2018/9/28/17855078/bulbasaur-best-starter-pokemon-gen-one|title=Bulbasaur has been the best Pokémon all along|first=Chris|last=Plante|date=September 28, 2018|website=Polygon|access-date=July 9, 2021|archive-date=September 28, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180928130412/https://www.polygon.com/pokemon/2018/9/28/17855078/bulbasaur-best-starter-pokemon-gen-one|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2016/11/24/kyles-favorite-new-pokemon-of-sun-and-moon.aspx|title=Kyle's Favorite New Pokémon Of Sun & Moon|first=Kyle|last=Hilliard|magazine=Game Informer|access-date=2021-07-09|archive-date=2021-07-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210711031446/https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2016/11/24/kyles-favorite-new-pokemon-of-sun-and-moon.aspx|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2014/04/03/23-of-the-weirdest-pokemon.aspx|title=23 Of The Weirdest Pokémon|first=Kyle|last=Hilliard|magazine=Game Informer|access-date=2021-07-09|archive-date=2021-07-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210727104425/https://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2014/04/03/23-of-the-weirdest-pokemon.aspx|url-status=live}}</ref>
Line 35: Line 35:
Despite criticisms over it being based on an inanimate object, there has been praise given to it from this angle. ''Kotaku'''s Patricia Hernandez noted that while some people dislike "inanimate objects that are somehow Pokémon," she defended it due to its basis on the Japanese mythological [[tsukumogami]] and Klefki's overall "ridiculous" design.<ref name="auto2"/> ''TheGamer'' writer Sergio Solorzano felt that the reason why people were more okay with Pokémon like Magnemite than they were with Klefki was because of nostalgia. He argued in favor of inanimate object Pokémon, and appreciated that Steel-type Pokémon were getting more creative.<ref name="TG">{{cite web |url=https://www.thegamer.com/object-pokemon-creative-good/ |title=Object Pokemon Are Creative, Actually |work=The Gamer |last=Solorzano |first=Sergio |date=February 27, 2021 |accessdate=February 17, 2024 |archive-date=March 3, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303050629/https://www.thegamer.com/object-pokemon-creative-good/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Despite criticisms over it being based on an inanimate object, there has been praise given to it from this angle. ''Kotaku'''s Patricia Hernandez noted that while some people dislike "inanimate objects that are somehow Pokémon," she defended it due to its basis on the Japanese mythological [[tsukumogami]] and Klefki's overall "ridiculous" design.<ref name="auto2"/> ''TheGamer'' writer Sergio Solorzano felt that the reason why people were more okay with Pokémon like Magnemite than they were with Klefki was because of nostalgia. He argued in favor of inanimate object Pokémon, and appreciated that Steel-type Pokémon were getting more creative.<ref name="TG">{{cite web |url=https://www.thegamer.com/object-pokemon-creative-good/ |title=Object Pokemon Are Creative, Actually |work=The Gamer |last=Solorzano |first=Sergio |date=February 27, 2021 |accessdate=February 17, 2024 |archive-date=March 3, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303050629/https://www.thegamer.com/object-pokemon-creative-good/ |url-status=live }}</ref>


Despite early assumptions that Klefki would be a weak Pokémon,<ref name="AS">{{cite web |url=https://as.com/meristation/2015/10/19/reportajes/1445238000_149345.html |title=Los 10 mejores Pokémon más OP, chetados y rotos |work=Meristation |last=López |first=Ángel |date=July 4, 2017 |accessdate=February 16, 2024 |archive-date=August 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190806154325/https://as.com/meristation/2015/10/19/reportajes/1445238000_149345.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Klefki was a significant Pokémon in the ''Pokémon X and Y'' competitive scene, among the game's top Pokémon due in part to being a "solid support wall."<ref name="TG"/><ref name="vg2472"/> Klefki's high placement was due to multiple factors, including its innate special ability, Prankster, and its access to certain status-affecting and support moves.<ref name="vg247"/><ref name="vg2472">{{cite web |url=https://www.vg247.com/these-are-the-most-powerful-pokemon |title=These are the most powerful Pokemon |work=VG247 |last=Hillier |first=Brenna |date=February 4, 2015 |accessdate=February 16, 2024 |archive-date=July 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701055025/https://www.vg247.com/these-are-the-most-powerful-pokemon |url-status=live }}</ref> Its type combination was also significant in its placement, due to its typings giving it valuable defensive utility.<ref name="vg247">{{cite web |url=https://www.vg247.com/what-are-the-strongest-most-competitive-pokemon-thatll-help-you-build-the-best-team |title=What are the Strongest, Most Competitive Pokemon That'll Help You Build the Best Team? |work=VG247 |last=Khaw |first=Cassandra |date=January 16, 2019 |accessdate=February 16, 2024 |archive-date=February 17, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217143304/https://www.vg247.com/what-are-the-strongest-most-competitive-pokemon-thatll-help-you-build-the-best-team |url-status=live }}</ref> In ''Pojo's Unofficial Big Book of Pokemon'', the author suggested it was a solid lead in battles, though it was a better fit for a support role in double battles.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4UcuDQAAQBAJ |title=Pojo's Unofficial Big Book of Pokemon |publisher=Triumph Books |date=November 1, 2016 |isbn=978-1-63319-704-6 |accessdate=February 17, 2024 |archive-date=February 17, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217143201/https://books.google.com/books?id=4UcuDQAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> ''VG247'' writer Cassandra Khaw was disappointed that such a "sloppy design" was so useful competitively.<ref name="vg247"/>
Despite early assumptions that Klefki would be a weak Pokémon,<ref name="AS">{{cite web |url=https://as.com/meristation/2015/10/19/reportajes/1445238000_149345.html |title=Los 10 mejores Pokémon más OP, chetados y rotos |work=Meristation |last=López |first=Ángel |date=July 4, 2017 |accessdate=February 16, 2024 |archive-date=August 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190806154325/https://as.com/meristation/2015/10/19/reportajes/1445238000_149345.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Klefki was a significant Pokémon in the ''Pokémon X'' and ''Y'' competitive scene, among the game's top Pokémon due in part to being a "solid support wall."<ref name="TG"/><ref name="vg2472"/> Klefki's high placement was due to multiple factors, including its innate special ability, Prankster, and its access to certain status-affecting and support moves.<ref name="vg247"/><ref name="vg2472">{{cite web |url=https://www.vg247.com/these-are-the-most-powerful-pokemon |title=These are the most powerful Pokemon |work=VG247 |last=Hillier |first=Brenna |date=February 4, 2015 |accessdate=February 16, 2024 |archive-date=July 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230701055025/https://www.vg247.com/these-are-the-most-powerful-pokemon |url-status=live }}</ref> Its type combination was also significant in its placement, due to its typings giving it valuable defensive utility.<ref name="vg247">{{cite web |url=https://www.vg247.com/what-are-the-strongest-most-competitive-pokemon-thatll-help-you-build-the-best-team |title=What are the Strongest, Most Competitive Pokemon That'll Help You Build the Best Team? |work=VG247 |last=Khaw |first=Cassandra |date=January 16, 2019 |accessdate=February 16, 2024 |archive-date=February 17, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217143304/https://www.vg247.com/what-are-the-strongest-most-competitive-pokemon-thatll-help-you-build-the-best-team |url-status=live }}</ref> In ''Pojo's Unofficial Big Book of Pokemon'', the author suggested it was a solid lead in battles, though it was a better fit for a support role in double battles.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4UcuDQAAQBAJ |title=Pojo's Unofficial Big Book of Pokemon |publisher=Triumph Books |date=November 1, 2016 |isbn=978-1-63319-704-6 |accessdate=February 17, 2024 |archive-date=February 17, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217143201/https://books.google.com/books?id=4UcuDQAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> ''VG247'' writer Cassandra Khaw was disappointed that such a "sloppy design" was so useful competitively.<ref name="vg247"/>
{{clear}}
{{clear}}



Revision as of 12:03, 25 June 2024

Klefki
Pokémon character
Klefki artwork by Ken Sugimori
First gamePokémon X and Y (2013)
Designed byMana Ibe
In-universe information
SpeciesPokémon
TypeSteel and Fairy

Klefki, known in Japan as Cleffy (クレッフィ) is a Pokémon species in Nintendo and Game Freak's Pokémon franchise. It was designed by Pokémon graphic designer Mana Ibe and was inspired by old mansions and secret keys. Klefki was first introduced in Pokémon X and Y. Klefki is a Steel and Fairy Pokémon that is known for constantly collecting keys. A short film about Klefki called Pikachu, What's This Key For? premiered as an opener for the 17th Pokémon film.

Klefki received a largely negative reception, though it gained the most attention among generation VI Pokémon prior to release. While multiple critics felt that it was a weird or terrible design, other critics spoke more highly of Klefki, defending it and other Pokémon based around inanimate objects. Critics also discussed how nostalgia impacts people's perception of Pokémon, citing the Pokémon Magnemite from Pokémon Red and Blue in comparison to Klefki. It was also a popular Pokémon in the competitive scene of Pokémon X and Y.

Concept and design

Klefki is a fictional species of Pokémon created for the Pokémon franchise. Developed by Game Freak and published by Nintendo, the series began in Japan in 1996 with the release of Pokémon Red and Blue for the Game Boy.[1] In these games, the player assumes the role of a Pokémon Trainer whose goal is to capture and train creatures called Pokémon. Players use the creatures' special abilities to combat other Pokémon, and some can transform into stronger species through a process called evolution.[2]

Klefki was designed by Pokémon graphic designer Mana Ibe, whose base idea derived from Kalos- the fictional region that Pokémon X and Y is set in- having an old history. Going off of that, they were inspired to add "story elements to a key design," basing the design off of the concepts of old mansion and secret keys.[3] While discussing unique Pokémon designs, Pokémon character designer Ken Sugimori felt that Klefki exemplified the "variety and richness" of Pokémon species designs due to being based on a key ring.[4]

Klefki has two elemental types: Steel and Fairy, which determine its resistances and strengths to other types in the game.[5] It also does not evolve.[6] Writer Patricia Hernandez of Kotaku speculated that it was partially inspired by the Japanese yōkai Tsukumogami, which are household objects that gain souls.[7]

Appearances

Klefki originally appeared in Pokémon X and Y,[7] before appearing in future mainline titles, including Pokémon Sword and Shield[8] and Pokémon Scarlet and Violet.[9] It appears in the mobile game Pokémon Go,[10] where it was made exclusively obtainable in the real world area of France. It was later discovered it could be obtained in parts of England, Germany, Spain, and Italy due to how developer Niantic designed the spawn area.[11]

Klefki debuted in the Pokémon anime in the short Pikachu, What's This Key?, where it used its keys to help Pikachu and his friends visit several worlds. It later appeared in several other episodes of the anime.[12]

Reception

Klefki's design received mixed reception, identified by writer Imran Khan as the go-to example of issues with modern Pokémon designs.[13] Video game journalists regarded its design as among the worst of new Pokémon introduced in X and Y, characterizing the design as uninspired, insipid, strange, and an example of Game Freak's "creative bankruptcy".[a] VentureBeat staff felt unsurprised by the concept behind the Pokémon, arguing that the team had run out of ideas.[21] It has also been regarded as one of the worst Pokémon in general, with IGN readers voting Klefki as one of the worst Pokémon from Pokémon X and Y.[22][23][24][25] Hayes Madsen of Screen Rant claimed that Klefki should never have been made, deriding it for being based on an object.[26]

Official artwork of Magnemite, which was frequently compared to Klefki due to various design aspects.

Kotaku writer Zack Zwiezen, when he originally saw Klefki, assumed it was a fake design due to the strange premise behind its design. He discussed how people differentiate modern Pokémon designs from classic ones, namely how a common criticism is that classic designs were "all-natural looking creatures." He criticized this notion, citing an earlier design in the series, Magnemite, as an example due to it being "screws and magnets." However, he digressed that Klefki may suggest that the designers were out of ideas and needed to take a break.[27] Fanbyte writer James O'Connor similarly cited Magnemite as an example of early Pokémon designs being strange, but still found Klefki unsettling despite the precedence.[28] VGC's Jordan Middler, Chris Scullion, and Andy Robinson discussed Klefki in their podcast, citing its design as an example of Pokémon's lack of design creativity as more games are released.[29] Other critics were more positive, with many other authors regarding it as one of their favorite Pokémon.[30][31][32][33]

Despite criticisms over it being based on an inanimate object, there has been praise given to it from this angle. Kotaku's Patricia Hernandez noted that while some people dislike "inanimate objects that are somehow Pokémon," she defended it due to its basis on the Japanese mythological tsukumogami and Klefki's overall "ridiculous" design.[7] TheGamer writer Sergio Solorzano felt that the reason why people were more okay with Pokémon like Magnemite than they were with Klefki was because of nostalgia. He argued in favor of inanimate object Pokémon, and appreciated that Steel-type Pokémon were getting more creative.[34]

Despite early assumptions that Klefki would be a weak Pokémon,[35] Klefki was a significant Pokémon in the Pokémon X and Y competitive scene, among the game's top Pokémon due in part to being a "solid support wall."[34][36] Klefki's high placement was due to multiple factors, including its innate special ability, Prankster, and its access to certain status-affecting and support moves.[37][36] Its type combination was also significant in its placement, due to its typings giving it valuable defensive utility.[37] In Pojo's Unofficial Big Book of Pokemon, the author suggested it was a solid lead in battles, though it was a better fit for a support role in double battles.[38] VG247 writer Cassandra Khaw was disappointed that such a "sloppy design" was so useful competitively.[37]

References

  1. ^ Hilliard, Kyle (December 25, 2016). "Pokémon Red & Blue – A Look Back At The 20-Year Journey To Catch 'Em All". Game Informer. Archived from the original on October 1, 2023. Retrieved January 22, 2024.
  2. ^ Allison, Anne (May 2006). Millennial Monsters: Japanese Toys and the Global Imagination. University of California Press. pp. 192–197. ISBN 9780520938991. Archived from the original on March 10, 2024. Retrieved March 9, 2024 – via WorldCat.
  3. ^ Hilliard, Kyle. "Afterwords – Pokémon X & Y". Game Informer. Archived from the original on 2021-07-09. Retrieved 2021-07-09.
  4. ^ The Pokémon Company (December 2017). Pokémon Ultra Sun and Pokémon Ultra Moon Edition. Piggyback Interactive. p. xv. ISBN 9781911015437.
  5. ^ Jurkovich, Tristan (February 24, 2019). "15 Things That Make No Sense About The Pokémon Universe (And 10 Fan Theories That Do)". TheGamer. Archived from the original on July 9, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  6. ^ Rose, Edd (June 12, 2021). "10 Pokémon That Badly Need A New Evolution". CBR. Archived from the original on July 9, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  7. ^ a b c Hernandez, Patricia (15 October 2013). "The Best (and Possibly Worst) of The New Pokémon Designs". Kotaku. Archived from the original on 2021-07-09. Retrieved 2021-07-09.
  8. ^ Murray, Sean (2020-07-01). "Pokémon Sword & Shield: How To Find Klefki". TheGamer. Retrieved 2024-05-26.
  9. ^ Webb, Ethan (December 8, 2022). "How To Find (& Catch) Klefki in Pokémon Scarlet and Violet". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on December 20, 2022. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
  10. ^ McWhertor, Michael (November 18, 2020). "Gen 6 Pokémon are coming to Pokémon Go". Polygon. Archived from the original on July 9, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  11. ^ Shaw, Luke (December 5, 2020). "Fans have discovered that 'Pokémon Klefki' is available in multiple regions". NME. Archived from the original on August 9, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2023.
  12. ^ Hansen, Steven (January 10, 2014). "17th Pokemon movie based on X & Y, has Mega Evolutions". Destructoid. Archived from the original on February 1, 2023. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
  13. ^ Khan, Imran (July 13, 2023). "The Most Photogenic Pokémon We Want in the New Pokémon Snap". Fanbyte. Archived from the original on July 25, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2023.
  14. ^ "Klefki is a Pokemon that is a KEY RING. IT IS A KEY RING". October 4, 2013. Archived from the original on July 18, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  15. ^ "Analyzing The New Pokémon Of X & Y". Game Informer. Archived from the original on 2021-07-09. Retrieved 2021-07-09.
  16. ^ Vincent, Brittany (29 January 2014). "14 Pokemon that are basically just ordinary objects with googly eyes". GamesRadar+. Archived from the original on 2021-07-11. Retrieved 2021-07-09.
  17. ^ "15 Worst Pokemon Designs Ever". ScreenRant. December 7, 2016. Archived from the original on July 9, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  18. ^ Michels, Hana; Kokkinos, Asterios (February 11, 2016). "13 Pokemon That Prove They're Out Of Ideas". Paste. Archived from the original on July 9, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  19. ^ Webber, Angela (2013-10-14). "Has Pokémon Run Out of Ideas?". The Portland Mercury. Archived from the original on 2014-03-04. Retrieved 2014-03-03.
  20. ^ Bailey, Kat (November 22, 2018). "Los peores Pokémon de cada generación". IGN. Archived from the original on October 9, 2023. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
  21. ^ Minotti, Mike; Grubb, Jeff (March 1, 2016). "20 years have produced some seriously ugly Pokémon". Archived from the original on November 2, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  22. ^ Dayus, Oscar (28 July 2016). "The 7 worst Pokemon ever". Pocket Gamer. Archived from the original on 2021-07-09. Retrieved 2021-07-09.
  23. ^ Loveridge, Sam (December 28, 2016). "20 worst Pokémon designs ever, ranked". Digital Spy. Archived from the original on July 9, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  24. ^ Finnegan, Liz (February 26, 2016). "10 Worst Pokemon Designs". Archived from the original on July 11, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  25. ^ Davis, Justin (26 November 2013). "The Best & Worst X/Y Pokemon Revealed". Archived from the original on 2021-07-11. Retrieved 2021-07-09.
  26. ^ Madsen, Hayes (28 April 2020). "Pokemon: Klefki Shouldn't Have Been Made | Screen Rant". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on 2022-12-17. Retrieved 2021-07-09.
  27. ^ Zwiezen, Zack (July 27, 2019). "Klefki Will Steal Your Keys And Never Give Them Back". Kotaku. Archived from the original on February 18, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
  28. ^ O'Connor, James. "The Most Disquieting Parts of Pokemon Sun and Moon". Fanbyte. Archived from the original on May 4, 2017. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
  29. ^ Middler, Jordan; Scullion, Chris; Robinson, Andy (2024-04-18). "Podcast: 'Is Klefki the worst Pokemon?'". VGC. Archived from the original on 2024-04-18. Retrieved 2024-04-19.
  30. ^ "The smaller Pokemon Sword and Shield Pokedex isn't all bad news". GameRevolution. November 13, 2019. Archived from the original on July 9, 2021. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  31. ^ Plante, Chris (September 28, 2018). "Bulbasaur has been the best Pokémon all along". Polygon. Archived from the original on September 28, 2018. Retrieved July 9, 2021.
  32. ^ Hilliard, Kyle. "Kyle's Favorite New Pokémon Of Sun & Moon". Game Informer. Archived from the original on 2021-07-11. Retrieved 2021-07-09.
  33. ^ Hilliard, Kyle. "23 Of The Weirdest Pokémon". Game Informer. Archived from the original on 2021-07-27. Retrieved 2021-07-09.
  34. ^ a b Solorzano, Sergio (February 27, 2021). "Object Pokemon Are Creative, Actually". The Gamer. Archived from the original on March 3, 2021. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
  35. ^ López, Ángel (July 4, 2017). "Los 10 mejores Pokémon más OP, chetados y rotos". Meristation. Archived from the original on August 6, 2019. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
  36. ^ a b Hillier, Brenna (February 4, 2015). "These are the most powerful Pokemon". VG247. Archived from the original on July 1, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
  37. ^ a b c Khaw, Cassandra (January 16, 2019). "What are the Strongest, Most Competitive Pokemon That'll Help You Build the Best Team?". VG247. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
  38. ^ Pojo's Unofficial Big Book of Pokemon. Triumph Books. November 1, 2016. ISBN 978-1-63319-704-6. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
  1. ^ Attributed to multiple sources [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]