Jump to content

User talk:Liah78: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Liah78 (talk | contribs)
111 edits
→June 2024: Reply
Line 39: Line 39:
*{{linksummarylive|wellnesssystemreport.co.uk|lh=spam}}
*{{linksummarylive|wellnesssystemreport.co.uk|lh=spam}}
*{{linksummarylive|usbusinessnews.com|lh=spam}}
*{{linksummarylive|usbusinessnews.com|lh=spam}}
== Nomination of [[:Greg Gunter]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Greg Gunter]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Gunter]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:Broc|Broc]] ([[User talk:Broc|talk]]) 11:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:49, 3 July 2024

Speedy deletion nomination of Spectrum confectionery ltd

Hello Liah78,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Spectrum confectionery ltd for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BrigadierG (talk) 00:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Liah78/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Liah78/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Air on White (talk) 19:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Air on White, Hope you are doing well.
It's in my sandbox... I have dumped the data for now. I can remove it if you like? However, it was my understanding that a sandbox is a personal space where we can practice whatever we like. Is that not the case here?
Thank you Liah78 (talk) 19:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Liah, you have wide freedom to use your sandbox, especially having already been established as a contributor to Wikipedia. However, promotion is still not permitted anywhere. I would have tagged it with G11 even if it was created by the most experienced administrators on this site. Air on White (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @Air on White thank you for your reply. I do understand your point and yes, I would have tagged G11 on such content, however, I would have done it if the article was in public domain like Draft space or a live page. I believe, you could have assumed good faith and asked me to remove the promotional content (Which I, already, have), since it is my sandbox.
Regardless, I would be grateful, if you could go through it once more, and see if G11 is applied. I would also be grateful if you could remove the tag. Although its my sandbox, however, I would like to extend the courtesy and good faith.
P.S. if you have any point of improvemt for me, I am more than willing to learn. Thank you. Liah78 (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
G11 along with the rest of the general criteria apply to every page on Wikipedia besides explicit exceptions defined with each individual criterion (WP:GCSD). The tagging was independent of my assumption of faith: regardless of whether it is good or bad faith, promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia. Outside limited cases like user talk pages, new creations of promotional articles are deleted instead of blanked. I will blank the page and remove the CSD tag. Thank you, Air on White (talk) 20:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Liah78 (talk) 20:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Stop icon You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Kuru. I will be careful in reference evaluation. Thanks. Liah78 (talk) 01:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Same problem seems to be recurring, Liah. Sam Kuru (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It won't from now onwards. I apologize for the previous mistakes. Thank you for pointing them out. Liah78 (talk) 17:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Greg Gunter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greg Gunter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Gunter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Broc (talk) 11:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liah78&oldid=1232369588"