Talk:LTP induction: Difference between revisions
agree with objection to merge |
Calcium |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[User:Synaptidude|Synaptidude]] 29 June 2005 16:03 (UTC) |
[[User:Synaptidude|Synaptidude]] 29 June 2005 16:03 (UTC) |
||
== Calcium == |
|||
Because of its importance for signal transduction in LTP, a think a more complete description on the role of calcium in LTP induction should be written here... |
|||
Revision as of 21:32, 23 July 2007
Merge with long-term potentiation
I'd rather not merge it. In reading up on Wikipedia style it seems that it is preferable to keep articles relatively short. The main LTP article is kind of long. What I was attempting here was to split some of the details off into separate articles as the style suggestions suggest. This current article, "LTP induction" is going to get a lot longer than it is currently. I've just begun to write on it. So I think it will be less and less appropriate to merge it into the main LTP article. Synaptidude 28 June 2005 17:08 (UTC)
- Agreed; it shouldn't be merged. --David Iberri (talk) 17:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
NMDA?
Why no mention of NMDA receptors.... only AMPA.....? Puzzling.
Because
I've not finished writing it yet.
Synaptidude 29 June 2005 16:03 (UTC)
Calcium
Because of its importance for signal transduction in LTP, a think a more complete description on the role of calcium in LTP induction should be written here...