Jump to content

Talk:Japanese destroyer Natsuzuki/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
started review
 
m Adding nominator information
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Good article tools}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Japanese destroyer Natsuzuki/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Japanese destroyer Natsuzuki/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Japanese destroyer Natsuzuki/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Japanese destroyer Natsuzuki/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>

'''Nominator:''' {{User|Sturmvogel 66}} 18:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


'''Reviewer:''' [[User:CosXZ|CosXZ]]&nbsp;([[User talk:CosXZ|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/CosXZ|contribs]]) 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:CosXZ|CosXZ]]&nbsp;([[User talk:CosXZ|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/CosXZ|contribs]]) 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:43, 6 August 2024

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Stable?

yes Cos (X + Z) 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]