Jump to content

User talk:Evans Reilly: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
per SPI
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{sockpuppet|1=Hamish Ross|2=blocked}}

== September 2024 ==
== September 2024 ==


Line 43: Line 41:
==Administrator note==
==Administrator note==
{{adminnote}}: This account is operated by a known troublemaker who is already banned. Anyone should feel free to undo any of their edits without explanation. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 10:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
{{adminnote}}: This account is operated by a known troublemaker who is already banned. Anyone should feel free to undo any of their edits without explanation. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 10:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
[[Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hamish Ross]]

Latest revision as of 21:00, 16 September 2024

September 2024

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You revert almost IP's edit. Zach (talk to me) 08:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Grimshaw, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. A quick search showed what you reverted was factual. Please properly check what you are editing before reverting. R0paire-wiki (talk) 08:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalize?

[edit]

Dear Evans

Can you please highlight what was wrong by adding correct useful information to the article?

IBM release a new version of Filenet (5.6.0) on August 8. That was all, that was added.

Regards

Jochen 217.162.145.41 (talk) 08:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?!

[edit]

Whilst the warning is appreciated, please do not attack people or label them as "vandals" when attempting to genuinely improve articles. If a mistake has been made, take the opportunity to educate people on why it is a mistake and how to avoid it in future. Thank you. 86.29.149.93 (talk) 08:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This user just did the same thing to me and they in fact just vandalized a page removing the producers. Talk about trying to intimidate people. SMH. 2600:1015:B13F:BED:B4CF:66FB:DC8:1764 (talk) 08:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a way to report users who are being abusive and/or exploitative to Wikipedia administrators. Might be worth considering given this user has no intention of engaging in good faith or civil discussion. 86.29.149.93 (talk) 08:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They already have been blocked. Try to add a new subject and a warning appears saying this user has been blocked indefinitely. 2600:1015:B13F:BED:B4CF:66FB:DC8:1764 (talk) 09:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, don’t be coming to people’s talk pages making threats.

[edit]

You reverted one of my edits removing information about producers and then you come making threats on my talk page? Excuse me? Maybe you should be look at and checking sources before you go trying to INTIMIDATE people for actual looking at the sources and saying that this doesn’t state what is actually being claimed. 2600:1015:B13F:BED:B4CF:66FB:DC8:1764 (talk) 08:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This revert right here you literally removed the producers from the track listing. That wasn’t vandalism. What the heck?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1015:B13F:BED:B4CF:66FB:DC8:1764 (talk) 08:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warming on editor talk page

[edit]

Hi Evans Reilly, Good day. I am one of the counter vandalism trainer/instructor for Wikipedia. I have seen your place warnings on editor talk pages. Pls note that not all the edits you place warnings on the editor talk page are considered vandalism and in addition they dont fit your warning level as you stated. There are different between blatant vandalism, unsourced, disruptive and many other edits and each need different level of warning and type of warning. Pls do not place "only warning" template on editors' talk pages when there is an unsourced edit. I suggest you to read the WP:V page a few times and if you really interested in counter vandalism then you can join the WP:CVUA. Pls be careful of your warnings which is not fit the guidelines as this is disruptive. Cassiopeia talk 09:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The user has already been blocked indefinitely. 2600:1015:B13F:BED:B4CF:66FB:DC8:1764 (talk) 09:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See - blocked indef - here. Cassiopeia talk 09:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They created another account. User:Aubrey O'Connell doing the same exact thing. 2600:1015:B13F:BED:B4CF:66FB:DC8:1764 (talk) 10:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note

[edit]

information Administrator note: This account is operated by a known troublemaker who is already banned. Anyone should feel free to undo any of their edits without explanation. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]