Jump to content

Talk:Wagner Group: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 38: Line 38:
There are paymen figures in this article that hardly make sense. Namely, it says that the pay could be between 80,000-250,000 rubles or 667-2083 in USD citing a 2017 article. So the USD/RUB ration was about 120 back then. Problem is, back in 2017 and prior the USD/RUB ration was between 60-70 rubles, even if we accout for net pay after taxes, it is still way off the 667-2083 range stated in the same sentence. The same applies to the next sentence, which states that 300,000 RUB corresponds to 2,500 USD according to an article published again in 2017 - once again a random USD/RUB ratio which has nothin to do with 2017 reality. [[User:Gorgedweller|Gorgedweller]] ([[User talk:Gorgedweller|talk]]) 11:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
There are paymen figures in this article that hardly make sense. Namely, it says that the pay could be between 80,000-250,000 rubles or 667-2083 in USD citing a 2017 article. So the USD/RUB ration was about 120 back then. Problem is, back in 2017 and prior the USD/RUB ration was between 60-70 rubles, even if we accout for net pay after taxes, it is still way off the 667-2083 range stated in the same sentence. The same applies to the next sentence, which states that 300,000 RUB corresponds to 2,500 USD according to an article published again in 2017 - once again a random USD/RUB ratio which has nothin to do with 2017 reality. [[User:Gorgedweller|Gorgedweller]] ([[User talk:Gorgedweller|talk]]) 11:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
:THis looks like OR. [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 12:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
:THis looks like OR. [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 12:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
::It may very well be. Either someone failed to understand the article they cited, or the authors of the articles are really bad at math. 12:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:10, 22 October 2024

Logo before 2023?

I remember the patch of a skull in a sniper reticle being prominently displayed on the article in the past. Was it removed due to copyright reasons? Surely it'd fall under fair use, right? It baffles me that the older and more notorious design wouldn't be shown anywhere on english wikipedia, let alone the dedicated page. EnzarelX (talk) 03:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 June 2024

TenshiPT (talk) 12:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC) At the final category (Post-Prigozhin's death) there's a sentence that says: "Wagner is officially becoming a unit of Rosgvardia...The entire structure, methods of work and commanders remain the same.", there's supposed to be "an unit of Rosgvardia" not "a unit of Rosgvardia"[reply]
 Not done: a unit is correct, an is only used when the next word begins with a vowel sound (regardless of whether the letter is a vowel or not). Unit begins with the consonant sound Y like a university or a universal truth. You only need an when the U makes a vowel sound like in an umbrella. English is a very weird language. Jamedeus (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory payment figures

There are paymen figures in this article that hardly make sense. Namely, it says that the pay could be between 80,000-250,000 rubles or 667-2083 in USD citing a 2017 article. So the USD/RUB ration was about 120 back then. Problem is, back in 2017 and prior the USD/RUB ration was between 60-70 rubles, even if we accout for net pay after taxes, it is still way off the 667-2083 range stated in the same sentence. The same applies to the next sentence, which states that 300,000 RUB corresponds to 2,500 USD according to an article published again in 2017 - once again a random USD/RUB ratio which has nothin to do with 2017 reality. Gorgedweller (talk) 11:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THis looks like OR. Slatersteven (talk) 12:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It may very well be. Either someone failed to understand the article they cited, or the authors of the articles are really bad at math. 12:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)