Academic specialization: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Added {{Merge from}} tag |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Altered issue. Add: date, jstor, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_toolbar |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Merge from|Specialization of knowledge|discuss=Talk:Academic specialization#Proposed merge of Specialization of knowledge into Academic specialization|date=November 2024}} |
{{Merge from|Specialization of knowledge|discuss=Talk:Academic specialization#Proposed merge of Specialization of knowledge into Academic specialization|date=November 2024}} |
||
In [[academy|academic]], '''specialization''' (or [[American and British English spelling differences#-ise.2C_-ize_.28-isation.nffe2C_-ization.29|'''specialisation''']]) may be a course of study or [[Academic major|major]] at an academic institution, or may refer to the field in which a [[specialist (disambiguation)|specialist]] practices. In the case of an educator, academic specialization pertains to the subject that they specialize in and teach.<ref>{{Cite book|title=To Want to Learn:nbnfkr Insights and Provocations for Engaged Learning, ediwow ed.|last=Kytle|first=Jackson|publisher=Palggrave Macmillan|year=2012|isbn=9780230338203|location=New York|pages=120}}</ref> It is considered a precondition of objective truth and works by restricting the mind's propensity for [[eclecticism]] through methodological rigor and studious effort.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=Historics: Why History Dominates Contemporary Society|last=Davies|first=Martin|publisher=Routledge|year=2006|isbn=0415261651|location=New York|pages=168}}</ref> It is also employed as an information-management strategy, which operates by fragmenting an issue into different fields or areas of expertise to obtain truth.<ref name=":0" /> In recent years, a new avenue of specialization has manifested through double majoring. It is a way to allow for a more diverse exposure to the college curriculum.<ref>{{Cite journal | |
In [[academy|academic]], '''specialization''' (or [[American and British English spelling differences#-ise.2C_-ize_.28-isation.nffe2C_-ization.29|'''specialisation''']]) may be a course of study or [[Academic major|major]] at an academic institution, or may refer to the field in which a [[specialist (disambiguation)|specialist]] practices. In the case of an educator, academic specialization pertains to the subject that they specialize in and teach.<ref>{{Cite book|title=To Want to Learn:nbnfkr Insights and Provocations for Engaged Learning, ediwow ed.|last=Kytle|first=Jackson|publisher=Palggrave Macmillan|year=2012|isbn=9780230338203|location=New York|pages=120}}</ref> It is considered a precondition of objective truth and works by restricting the mind's propensity for [[eclecticism]] through methodological rigor and studious effort.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=Historics: Why History Dominates Contemporary Society|last=Davies|first=Martin|publisher=Routledge|year=2006|isbn=0415261651|location=New York|pages=168}}</ref> It is also employed as an information-management strategy, which operates by fragmenting an issue into different fields or areas of expertise to obtain truth.<ref name=":0" /> In recent years, a new avenue of specialization has manifested through double majoring. It is a way to allow for a more diverse exposure to the college curriculum.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Pitt |first1=Richard |last2=Pirtle |first2=Whitney N. Laster |last3=Metzger |first3=Ashley Noel |date=2017 |title=Academic Specialization, Double Majoring, and the Threat to Breadth in Academic Knowledge |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0166 |journal=The Journal of General Education |volume=66 |issue=3–4 |pages=166–191 |doi=10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0166 |jstor=10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0166 |issn=0021-3667}}</ref> |
||
== Development == |
== Development == |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Further reading== |
==Further reading== |
||
* {{Cite web|url=http://www.stanforddaily.com/2010/02/18/adventures-in-academia-the-dangers-of-overspecialization/|title=Adventures in Academia: The Dangers of (Over)Specialization|last=Crichton|first=Danny|website=Stanford Daily|access-date=2017-03-04}} |
* {{Cite web|url=http://www.stanforddaily.com/2010/02/18/adventures-in-academia-the-dangers-of-overspecialization/|title=Adventures in Academia: The Dangers of (Over)Specialization|last=Crichton|first=Danny|website=Stanford Daily|date=18 February 2010 |access-date=2017-03-04}} |
||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
Revision as of 07:51, 1 November 2024
 | It has been suggested that Specialization of knowledge be merged into this article. (Discuss) Proposed since November 2024. |
In academic, specialization (or specialisation) may be a course of study or major at an academic institution, or may refer to the field in which a specialist practices. In the case of an educator, academic specialization pertains to the subject that they specialize in and teach.[1] It is considered a precondition of objective truth and works by restricting the mind's propensity for eclecticism through methodological rigor and studious effort.[2] It is also employed as an information-management strategy, which operates by fragmenting an issue into different fields or areas of expertise to obtain truth.[2] In recent years, a new avenue of specialization has manifested through double majoring. It is a way to allow for a more diverse exposure to the college curriculum.[3]
Development
As the volume of knowledge accumulated by humanity became too great, increasing specialization in academia appeared in response.[4] There are also cases when this concept emerged from state policymaking to pursue goals such as national competitiveness. For instance, there is the case of Britain who began coordinating academic specialization — through the founding of the Imperial College — to catch up to the United States and Germany, particularly in the fields of scientific and technical education.[5]
References
- ^ Kytle, Jackson (2012). To Want to Learn:nbnfkr Insights and Provocations for Engaged Learning, ediwow ed. New York: Palggrave Macmillan. p. 120. ISBN 9780230338203.
- ^ a b Davies, Martin (2006). Historics: Why History Dominates Contemporary Society. New York: Routledge. p. 168. ISBN 0415261651.
- ^ Pitt, Richard; Pirtle, Whitney N. Laster; Metzger, Ashley Noel (2017). "Academic Specialization, Double Majoring, and the Threat to Breadth in Academic Knowledge". The Journal of General Education. 66 (3–4): 166–191. doi:10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0166. ISSN 0021-3667. JSTOR 10.5325/jgeneeduc.66.3-4.0166.
- ^ Yale Forest School News, Volumes 77-78. Yale Forestry Alumni Assn. 1990. p. 5.
- ^ Feingold, Mordechai (2003). History of Universities: Volume XVIII/1 2003, Volume 18. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 124. ISBN 0199262020.
Further reading
- Crichton, Danny (18 February 2010). "Adventures in Academia: The Dangers of (Over)Specialization". Stanford Daily. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
External links
Wikiquote has quotations related to Specialization.
 | This article relating to education is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |