Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Transport/Assessments: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
JL-Bot (talk | contribs)
Bots
560,708 edits
updating recognized content
JL-Bot (talk | contribs)
Bots
560,708 edits
updating recognized content
 
Line 161: Line 161:
*{{icon|GA}} [[:Thornlie line]]
*{{icon|GA}} [[:Thornlie line]]
*{{icon|GA}} [[:Tonkin Highway]]
*{{icon|GA}} [[:Tonkin Highway]]
*{{icon|GA}} [[:Trams in Adelaide]]
*{{icon|GA}} [[:Tramways in Adelaide]]
*{{icon|GA}} [[:Upfield line]]
*{{icon|GA}} [[:Upfield line]]
*{{icon|GA}} [[:Victoria Park railway station, Perth]]
*{{icon|GA}} [[:Victoria Park railway station, Perth]]
Line 178: Line 178:
*{{icon|DYK}} [[:QantasLink Flight 1737]] <small>(2007-01-09)</small>
*{{icon|DYK}} [[:QantasLink Flight 1737]] <small>(2007-01-09)</small>
*{{icon|DYK}} [[:Mooney Mooney Bridge]] <small>(2007-02-16)</small>
*{{icon|DYK}} [[:Mooney Mooney Bridge]] <small>(2007-02-16)</small>
*{{icon|DYK}} [[:Trams in Adelaide]] <small>(2007-02-16)</small>
*{{icon|DYK}} [[:Tramways in Adelaide]] <small>(2007-02-16)</small>
*{{icon|DYK}} [[:Port of Geelong]] <small>(2007-11-09)</small>
*{{icon|DYK}} [[:Port of Geelong]] <small>(2007-11-09)</small>
*{{icon|DYK}} [[:Doncaster railway line]] <small>(2008-03-10)</small>
*{{icon|DYK}} [[:Doncaster railway line]] <small>(2008-03-10)</small>

Latest revision as of 11:08, 21 December 2024

WikiProject Australian Transport

Oz Noticeboard | Transport Noticeboard | Requested photos | Members | Categories | To-Do | Article alerts | Tools | Assessments | Popular pages

Of the 8,466 pages overseen by WikiProject Australian Transport:

  • 6244 are articles or lists
  • 73 are files
  • 1136 are categories
  • 626 are templates


100% have been assessed for quality
See Category:Unassessed Australian Transport articles for the 0 remaining articles



100% have known importance
See Category:Unknown-importance Australian Transport articles for the 0 remaining articles



65.9% of prose articles are not stubs
See Category:Stub-Class Australian Transport articles for the 2083 remaining articles



Aviation

[edit]
Main article: Aviation in Australia
Category: Aviation in Australia 		% finished

Infrastructure

[edit]
Bridges, lighthouses, tunnels, etc. (non station)
Category: Transport infrastructure in Australia 		% finished

Roads

[edit]
Main article: Road transport in Australia
Category: Road transport in Australia 		% finished

Ships

[edit]
Main article: Water transport in Australia
Category: Water transport in Australia 		% finished

Train

[edit]
Including timber tramways, etc
Main article: Rail transport in Australia
Category: Rail transport in Australia 		% finished

Tram

[edit]
Trams and light rail (for timber tramways, etc see Assessments/Train)
Main article: Trams in Australia
Category: Tram transport in Australia, Light rail in Australia 		% finished

Transport

[edit]
Main article: Transport in Australia
Category: Transport in Australia 		% finished


Recognised content

[edit]
[edit]
[edit]

Good articles

[edit]

Former good articles

[edit]

Did you know? articles

[edit]
[edit]
  • Albury railway station, Australia
    Albury railway station, Australia
  • Swanston and Flinders St intersection 1927
    Swanston and Flinders St intersection 1927

Main page featured articles

[edit]

Main page featured lists

[edit]

Picture of the day pictures

[edit]
  • Swanston and Flinders St intersection 1927 (2006-08-25)
    Swanston and Flinders St intersection 1927 (2006-08-25)
  • Albury railway station, Australia (2021-08-30)
    Albury railway station, Australia (2021-08-30)

Level 5 vital articles

[edit]

Grading Scheme

[edit]

Quality Scale

[edit]
WikiProject content quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
 FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. O-Bahn Busway
 FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. List of Sydney Metro stations
 A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Great Northern Highway
 GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
A good article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Pakenham line
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Roma Street railway station
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Transport in Australia
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Federal Highway (Australia)
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. -
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of Transperth railway stations
Category Any category falls under this class. Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. Category:Transport in Australia
Disambig Any disambiguation page falls under this class. The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. Town Hall railway station
File Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. File:Transperth logo.svg
Portal Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class. Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date. -
Project All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Transport
Redirect Any redirect falls under this class. The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. -
Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. Template:Australianferries

Importance scale

[edit]
WikiProject article importance scheme
Importance Criteria Example
 Top Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international or national notability within their field. Transport in Australia
 High Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved national notability, or is only notable within a particular state. City Loop
 Mid Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. Snowy Mountains Highway
 Low Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. Gawler railway station
 NA Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. Town Hall railway station
 ??? Subject importance has not yet been assessed.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Australian_Transport/Assessments&oldid=1264295004"