User talk:Muhandes: Difference between revisions
→Better source request for File:Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology University logo.png: reply to VeritasVanguard: That's certainly a valid argument. (-) |
|||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
:::@[[User:VeritasVanguard|VeritasVanguard]]: I agree the image you used is not eligible for copyright, thought I'm not sure about the one I use as it has some complexity. I care very little either way. I also care very little about which image you choose to use for the page, but I thought the purpose of the image is to identify the organization. Wouldn't the organization be better identified by the logo on their home page, rather than on their annual reports? Please take this into consideration when deciding which image to use. [[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes#top|talk]]) 15:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC) |
:::@[[User:VeritasVanguard|VeritasVanguard]]: I agree the image you used is not eligible for copyright, thought I'm not sure about the one I use as it has some complexity. I care very little either way. I also care very little about which image you choose to use for the page, but I thought the purpose of the image is to identify the organization. Wouldn't the organization be better identified by the logo on their home page, rather than on their annual reports? Please take this into consideration when deciding which image to use. [[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes#top|talk]]) 15:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::@[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]], If you ever got to visit this institution, the logo they use offline, has no complexity in 'ti' they use. Neither there is any "complexity" in any of its forms, or notifications. the one you are referring is only used online on their website. (on thapar.edu), their branding is somewhat inconsistent as they use different version of their logos on different websites of theirs. but they use same on every offline things they do. [[User:VeritasVanguard|VeritasVanguard]] ''"Seeking truth in every edit"'' 05:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
::::@[[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]], If you ever got to visit this institution, the logo they use offline, has no complexity in 'ti' they use. Neither there is any "complexity" in any of its forms, or notifications. the one you are referring is only used online on their website. (on thapar.edu), their branding is somewhat inconsistent as they use different version of their logos on different websites of theirs. but they use same on every offline things they do. [[User:VeritasVanguard|VeritasVanguard]] ''"Seeking truth in every edit"'' 05:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::::That's certainly a valid argument. [[User:Muhandes|Muhandes]] ([[User talk:Muhandes#top|talk]]) 07:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:35, 10 November 2024
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
TUSC token e80b809c8cc344eed212d9db46506234
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
File mover granted
Hello Muhandes. Your account has been granted the "filemover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want the file mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Elli (talk | contribs) 14:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Félag hljómplötuframleiðenda
On 24 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Félag hljómplötuframleiðenda, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Félag hljómplötuframleiðenda tried to close the file-sharing website Istorrent in 2007–2008, but the Supreme Court of Iceland dismissed the case? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Félag hljómplötuframleiðenda. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Félag hljómplötuframleiðenda), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Reverted edit over on template talk page
Hello! Thanks for reverting that edit over at Template talk:Infobox India university ranking/Archive 1. I didn't even notice it was an archive page ... and that you made the comment more than two years ago. Why is it, though, that Wikipedia only notified me of your comment today? see here -- mikeblas (talk) 21:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Mikeblas: I have no idea why it pings when I archive. Muhandes (talk) 22:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Now I'm getting notifications from you about a "TUSC token". Do you know what that is? -- mikeblas (talk) 23:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Mikeblas: that would be the failure of the Convenient Discussions script, also beyond my control. Muhandes (talk) 07:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Now I'm getting notifications from you about a "TUSC token". Do you know what that is? -- mikeblas (talk) 23:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Better source request for File:Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology University logo.png
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука13 21:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Iruka13: The source is the organizations home page. The URL I provided is https://www.thapar.edu/images/logo-ft.png and the home page where the image exists is https://www.thapar.edu. Do you think it is a better source? Also, this is a fair use image, the copyright stats doesn't matter, does it? Muhandes (talk) 22:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- It is preferable to provide a link to the page where the image is located, rather than to the image itself.
- Didn't understand the last question. — Ирука13 22:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Iruka13: Done. Muhandes (talk) 22:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Muhandes This logo do not qualify for copyright. It do not meet the threshold for originality needed for copyright protection. It is a trademark. I have reverted your edit on the college's wikipedia page, to its simple logo as is used in its annual reports. VeritasVanguard "Seeking truth in every edit" 11:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @VeritasVanguard: I agree the image you used is not eligible for copyright, thought I'm not sure about the one I use as it has some complexity. I care very little either way. I also care very little about which image you choose to use for the page, but I thought the purpose of the image is to identify the organization. Wouldn't the organization be better identified by the logo on their home page, rather than on their annual reports? Please take this into consideration when deciding which image to use. Muhandes (talk) 15:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Muhandes, If you ever got to visit this institution, the logo they use offline, has no complexity in 'ti' they use. Neither there is any "complexity" in any of its forms, or notifications. the one you are referring is only used online on their website. (on thapar.edu), their branding is somewhat inconsistent as they use different version of their logos on different websites of theirs. but they use same on every offline things they do. VeritasVanguard "Seeking truth in every edit" 05:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- That's certainly a valid argument. Muhandes (talk) 07:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Muhandes, If you ever got to visit this institution, the logo they use offline, has no complexity in 'ti' they use. Neither there is any "complexity" in any of its forms, or notifications. the one you are referring is only used online on their website. (on thapar.edu), their branding is somewhat inconsistent as they use different version of their logos on different websites of theirs. but they use same on every offline things they do. VeritasVanguard "Seeking truth in every edit" 05:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- @VeritasVanguard: I agree the image you used is not eligible for copyright, thought I'm not sure about the one I use as it has some complexity. I care very little either way. I also care very little about which image you choose to use for the page, but I thought the purpose of the image is to identify the organization. Wouldn't the organization be better identified by the logo on their home page, rather than on their annual reports? Please take this into consideration when deciding which image to use. Muhandes (talk) 15:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)