Talk:Suzet McKinney: Difference between revisions
→Page Concerns: helped |
→Orphan Article Issue Resolution: new section |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:In fact, I'd say that when New Page Patrol comes across this article, there's a chance they may start deletion proceedings. To avoid that, I can move this into the draft space for you, where you can continue working on it safely, and then submit it for review through the AfC process, if you'd like? |
:In fact, I'd say that when New Page Patrol comes across this article, there's a chance they may start deletion proceedings. To avoid that, I can move this into the draft space for you, where you can continue working on it safely, and then submit it for review through the AfC process, if you'd like? |
||
:Sorry, I realise that doesn't actually answer your question in any way! :) -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 17:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
:Sorry, I realise that doesn't actually answer your question in any way! :) -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 17:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Orphan Article Issue Resolution == |
|||
As Dr. McKinney is on the Board of the Atomic Scientists and co authored the last article moving the doomsday clock, I edited that page and linked the two pages. [[User:CuriousSunflower24|CuriousSunflower24]] ([[User talk:CuriousSunflower24|talk]]) 18:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:42, 12 November 2024
Wiki Education assignment: Chicago Women Rhetors
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2024 and 19 November 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CuriousSunflower24 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Blairps.
— Assignment last updated by Jbox19 (talk) 23:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Page Concerns
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I’ve been trying to adjust the issues with this article posted last week, and I would like help particularly with the orphan article and linking issues, but welcome any suggestions for these issues. CuriousSunflower24 (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @CuriousSunflower24: if I may say, the most substantive issue (by far) with this article is that it does not demonstrate that the person is notable, and my advice would be to focus on that as a priority. The sources are mostly primary, and therefore cannot establish notability per the general notability guideline WP:GNG. I don't see anything in there that would satisfy any of the special notability guidelines (WP:NACADEMIC, WP:NPOL, etc.), either.
- In fact, I'd say that when New Page Patrol comes across this article, there's a chance they may start deletion proceedings. To avoid that, I can move this into the draft space for you, where you can continue working on it safely, and then submit it for review through the AfC process, if you'd like?
- Sorry, I realise that doesn't actually answer your question in any way! :) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Orphan Article Issue Resolution
As Dr. McKinney is on the Board of the Atomic Scientists and co authored the last article moving the doomsday clock, I edited that page and linked the two pages. CuriousSunflower24 (talk) 18:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)