Talk:Court of labour (Belgium): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 11:26, 29 November 2024

Belgium High‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 28 November 2024

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

– Unnecessary disambiguations; no other country has these English names. Santiago Claudio (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - both could be used as alternate terms for Labor court and Trial court, respectively. Thus, the proposal fails WP:PRECISION. estar8806 (talk) ★ 02:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per estar8806. Too generic. See also the French Tribunal d'instance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:24, 28 November 2024 edit Estar8806 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,128 edits →Requested move 28 November 2024: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:26, 29 November 2024 edit undo Necrothesp (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 189,288 edits →Requested move 28 November 2024 Next edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:'''Oppose''' - both could be used as alternate terms for [[Labor court]] and [[Trial court]], respectively. Thus, the proposal fails [[WP:PRECISION]]. [[User:Estar8806\|estar8806]] ([[User talk:Estar8806\|talk]]) [[Special:Contributions/Estar8806 \|★]] 02:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)		:'''Oppose''' - both could be used as alternate terms for [[Labor court]] and [[Trial court]], respectively. Thus, the proposal fails [[WP:PRECISION]]. [[User:Estar8806\|estar8806]] ([[User talk:Estar8806\|talk]]) [[Special:Contributions/Estar8806 \|★]] 02:24, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
			*'''Oppose''' per estar8806. Too generic. See also the French [[Tribunal d'instance]]. -- [[User:Necrothesp\|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp\|talk]]) 11:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)