Draft:Arch Company: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ferrierrose (talk | contribs) Submitting using AfC-submit-wizard |
Declining submission: corp - Submission is about a company or organization not yet shown to meet notability guidelines (AFCH) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
{{AFC submission|d|corp|u=Ferrierrose|ns=118|decliner=Dan arndt|declinets=20241202085547|small=yes|ts=20241201213652}} <!-- Do not remove this line! --> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
{{AfC submission|||ts=20241202091405|u=Ferrierrose|ns=118}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{AFC submission|d|corp|u=Ferrierrose|ns=118|decliner=DoubleGrazing|declinets=20241201132814|small=yes|ts=20241201111817}} <!-- Do not remove this line! --> |
{{AFC submission|d|corp|u=Ferrierrose|ns=118|decliner=DoubleGrazing|declinets=20241201132814|small=yes|ts=20241201111817}} <!-- Do not remove this line! --> |
||
{{AFC comment|1=House of Commons records are primary sources. The two secondary sources (BBC, ''Guardian'') talk about the subject only indirectly or obliquely, without actually mentioning "Arch Company" once. And even if we accept both as contributing towards notability of Arch Company, this isn't enough to satisfy [[WP:NCORP]], which is usually taken to require three or more solid sources that meet the [[WP:GNG]] standard. [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 09:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{AFC comment|1=Fails [[WP:NCOMPANY]], requires significant coverage (about the company) in multiple independent secondary sources. [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 08:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
{{AFC comment|1=Fails [[WP:NCOMPANY]], requires significant coverage (about the company) in multiple independent secondary sources. [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 08:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
'''Arch Company''' is a private real estate company in the [[United Kingdom]] that was created in 2018. It manages a portfolio of over 5,300 properties, most of which are [[Viaduct|railway arches]] and 60 percent are in London.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-03-22/debates/1FBD5102-2E90-4FC5-B669-EE9C2810591C/SmallBusinessesInRailwayArches |title = Small Businesses in Railway Arches| publisher= House of Commons Hansard | date = 22 March 2023 |
'''Arch Company''' is a private real estate company in the [[United Kingdom]] that was created in 2018. It manages a portfolio of over 5,300 properties, most of which are [[Viaduct|railway arches]] and 60 percent are in London.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2023-03-22/debates/1FBD5102-2E90-4FC5-B669-EE9C2810591C/SmallBusinessesInRailwayArches |title = Small Businesses in Railway Arches| publisher= House of Commons Hansard | date = 22 March 2023 |
||
Revision as of 09:40, 2 December 2024
Submission declined on 2 December 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 2 December 2024 by Dan arndt (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Dan arndt 36 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 1 December 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 37 days ago.
| |
Comment: House of Commons records are primary sources. The two secondary sources (BBC, Guardian) talk about the subject only indirectly or obliquely, without actually mentioning "Arch Company" once. And even if we accept both as contributing towards notability of Arch Company, this isn't enough to satisfy WP:NCORP, which is usually taken to require three or more solid sources that meet the WP:GNG standard. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Fails WP:NCOMPANY, requires significant coverage (about the company) in multiple independent secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 08:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Arch Company is a private real estate company in the United Kingdom that was created in 2018. It manages a portfolio of over 5,300 properties, most of which are railway arches and 60 percent are in London.[1]
History
The company was founded in 2018 after Network Rail agreed to sell approximately 5,200 of its properties to American investment firm Blackstone and British commercial property investor Telereal_Trillium. The deal was completed for £1.46bn with equal ownership shares for each company. Network Rail remained the freeholder on the sites with a 150-year lease.[2] Network Rail was compelled to make the sale in a 2015 deal with chancellor George Osborne in exchange for funding for rail infrastructure upgrades.[3]. A 2019 report on the sale conducted by the Committee of Public Accounts found "the sale was professionally managed, generated competitive tension and achieved a fair price for the portfolio when valued as a business", but also that "we remain unconvinced that the sale represents the best value for the public and the public sector finances in the long term."[4]
References
- ^ "Small Businesses in Railway Arches". House of Commons Hansard. 22 March 2023.
- ^ "Network Rail sells railway arches to investors for £1.5bn".
- ^ "Network Rail sell-off to fund upgrades".
- ^ "Network Rail's sale of railway arches" (PDF). House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts. September 9, 2019.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.