Jump to content

User talk:PersonAccount: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edit by MSUisakkkschool (talk) to last version by PersonAccount
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
Line 46: Line 46:


:Okay, I understand. [[User:PersonAccount|PersonAccount 🐉]] ([[User talk:PersonAccount#top|talk]]) 15:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
:Okay, I understand. [[User:PersonAccount|PersonAccount 🐉]] ([[User talk:PersonAccount#top|talk]]) 15:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

== Fuck you for reverting my edits ==

How dare you revert my edits to the [[Kevin Guskiewicz]] you fucking nazi, also you littearly use a dragon emoji as your signature which is so fucking weird. Rot in hell bitch [[User:YouRevertedMyEditsHowDareYou|YouRevertedMyEditsHowDareYou]] ([[User talk:YouRevertedMyEditsHowDareYou|talk]]) 03:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:22, 22 December 2024

Welcome!

Hi PersonAccount! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 20:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the helpful guide, I appreciate it PersonAccount (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hi PersonAccount,

regarding the article about Sandeep Lamichhane, please keep WP:BLPRESTORE in mind (If it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first.).

If a consensus for the inclusion of the content is found at Talk:Sandeep Lamichhane, the content can be restored.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand. PersonAccount 🐉 (talk) 15:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you for reverting my edits

How dare you revert my edits to the Kevin Guskiewicz you fucking nazi, also you littearly use a dragon emoji as your signature which is so fucking weird. Rot in hell bitch YouRevertedMyEditsHowDareYou (talk) 03:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]