Talk:Pocahontas: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:09, 29 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pocahontas article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 30 days

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 20, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 5, 2010, April 5, 2017, April 5, 2019, April 5, 2022, and April 5, 2024.

Religion: Interfaith High‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Indigenous peoples of North America High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia High‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

United States: History High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as High-importance).

Women's History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kent Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

On 30 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Pocahontas to Matoaka. The result of the discussion was Not moved.

Semi-protected edit request on 17 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Pocahontas was forced into Christianity (formerly known as encouraged into Christianity). 2600:1014:B0A0:D3C1:F1B4:1833:EB84:30D4 (talk) 02:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 06:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Video Game History

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lehstudent (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Lehstudent (talk) 22:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The section covering the Disney version is VERY opinionated and VERY un-Wikipedia-like

It keeps going on and on about how harmful and offensive the movie is, even though many people (of all races) find it just OK. This isn't TV Tropes, we are supposed to present facts in an unbiased manner. Hell, the Disney Wiki is much less harsh towards the movie and the character, so the fact that this site has this very biased and un-encyclopedic section bothers me a great deal.

The whole section needs a rewrite badly. Just say that the Disney version exists and is popular, and leave it at that. Agustinaldo (talk) 01:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree a rewrite is needed - it reads like a school essay. But no doubt there has been some harsh criticism. Johnbod (talk) 03:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 01:09, 29 December 2024 edit Agustinaldo (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,574 edits →The section covering the Disney version is VERY opinionated and VERY un-Wikipedia-like: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:09, 29 December 2024 edit undo Johnbod (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Rollbackers 280,450 edits →The section covering the Disney version is VERY opinionated and VERY un-Wikipedia-like: hmmm Next edit →
Line 56:		Line 56:

	The whole section needs a rewrite badly. Just say that the Disney version exists and is popular, and leave it at that. [[User:Agustinaldo\|Agustinaldo]] ([[User talk:Agustinaldo\|talk]]) 01:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)		The whole section needs a rewrite badly. Just say that the Disney version exists and is popular, and leave it at that. [[User:Agustinaldo\|Agustinaldo]] ([[User talk:Agustinaldo\|talk]]) 01:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
			:I'd agree a rewrite is needed - it reads like a school essay. But no doubt there has been some harsh criticism. [[User:Johnbod\|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod\|talk]]) 03:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)