Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal status of Sealand: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
**I don't know, but I would like to point out to local Wikipedians that I like barbeques. --[[User:Kingboyk|kingboyk]] 19:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC) |
**I don't know, but I would like to point out to local Wikipedians that I like barbeques. --[[User:Kingboyk|kingboyk]] 19:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
**I can point out many more ridiculous articles. Sealand has been around for 40 years. How long was your barbecue? -[[User:Indolences|Indolences]] 19:30, 10 May 2007 (UTC) |
**I can point out many more ridiculous articles. Sealand has been around for 40 years. How long was your barbecue? -[[User:Indolences|Indolences]] 19:30, 10 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Hmmm...summer cookout/declaration of independent state, giving me ideas. In all seriousness, all that can be said about the legal status of [[Sealand]] is in the [[Sealand]] article. [[User:Wildthing61476|Wildthing61476]] 19:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:32, 10 May 2007
- Legal status of Sealand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This seems to be original research and is unreferenced. My initial plan was to merge this into the main article Principality of Sealand; however, that article already has a sensibly sized section on legal issues. Instead I must recommend this for deletion as an unnecessary fork, over detailed for an encyclopedia, and unreferenced original research. kingboyk 18:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- I created the article to de-bloat the Sealand page. When I am not so busy I can clean it up and cite sources, but at this point in time I do not have time. -Indolences 19:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete What is it about this topic that makes people think it needs more than one article to cover everything? It's a micronation. There are never more than ten people on the island at a given time. I had more people than that over for a barbecue last week and we didn't adopt a flag, a coat of arms, or contemplate our legal status. Everything that needs to be said about the Principality of Sealand should be done in the main article. --Cyrus Andiron 19:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know, but I would like to point out to local Wikipedians that I like barbeques. --kingboyk 19:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- I can point out many more ridiculous articles. Sealand has been around for 40 years. How long was your barbecue? -Indolences 19:30, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Hmmm...summer cookout/declaration of independent state, giving me ideas. In all seriousness, all that can be said about the legal status of Sealand is in the Sealand article. Wildthing61476 19:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)