User talk:199.246.2.9: Difference between revisions
m An automated message from MartinBot |
Caution: Vandalism on Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury. using TW |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
Your recent edit to [[:Octopus]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Octopus&diff=131598073&oldid=131524762 diff]) was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]] to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. '''[[User:Tawkerbot2/FAQ|Click here]]''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // [[User:MartinBot|MartinBot]] 18:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC) |
Your recent edit to [[:Octopus]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Octopus&diff=131598073&oldid=131524762 diff]) was reverted by an '''automated bot''' that attempts to recognize and repair [[Wikipedia:vandalism|vandalism]] to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. '''[[User:Tawkerbot2/FAQ|Click here]]''' for '''frequently asked questions''' about the bot and this warning. // [[User:MartinBot|MartinBot]] 18:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
== September 2007 == |
|||
{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:Iain99|Iain99]]<sup>[[User talk:Iain99|Balderdash]] and [[Special:Contributions/Iain99|piffle]]</sup> 00:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make any [[Wikipedia:vandalism|unconstructive]] edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.'' |
|||
Revision as of 00:49, 23 September 2007
Hi. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, you are mistaken regarding the spelling of the name of City of St. Catharines. Please consult the city's website if in doubt. Based on this, I have reverted your edits. Have a nice day. ~-Qviri 05:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for experimenting with the page Age of Enlightenment on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.
--Krich (talk) 00:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Trombone. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Special-T 22:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Civility
Please do not make personal attacks against users, as you did to User:Steven Solarz. If you have a content dispute you would like to discuss, please feel free to bring it up in a civil manner on Steven Solarz's talk page. Thank you, Dar-Ape 02:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to Oxygen
Your recent edit to Oxygen (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content, as you did to Buffalo Bills. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Bennybp 23:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
April 2007
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Nellie McClung. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. — Nivix talk 15:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nellie McClung, you will be blocked from editing. — Nivix talk 15:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Johnny Au 01:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Vandalizing Pages
Stop vandalizing Wikipedia, as what you did to 'Demonic Resurrection'. You should be banned. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sashazaara (talk • contribs) 23:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC).
May 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Apollo 11. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Demonic Resurrection (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 00:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wyoming Valley battle and massacre, you will be blocked from editing. Ali 00:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Your recent edit to Octopus (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
September 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 00:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.