Talk:North American FJ-2/-3 Fury: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:25, 3 June 2007

Aviation: Aircraft Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Additional information:
/
	This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

Infobox edits

I'm not sure there's an easy tsolution to being accurate about which airframe was developed from which. THe FJ led to the XP-86 which led to the F-86A, the F-86E led to the FJ-2 and 3, and the FJ-4 has no real F-86 equivilent, being a derivitive of the FJ-3. About the only way to be really clear about it is to split the straight wing FJ-1 off from the swept wings, but there really isn't enough content as yet to do that. Any thoughts/suggestions? - BillCJ 20:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The FJ-1 looks completely different to the F-86/FJ-2 and subsequent variants. Not just the straight wings - it's also a fatter, stubbier plane. Drutt 14:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For comparison, FJ-1 and FJ-2 Drutt 14:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, technically they are different planes, but as above, they are closely related. In addition, they share the same basic US Navy designation. Given the current lack of extensive coverage on the page, especially usable pics, keeping all the variants together is probably best. Perhaps at some point in the future a split could be made, but right now it would just turn a stubby article into 2 or 3 stubs. - BillCJ 15:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:57, 3 June 2007 edit Drutt (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 7,651 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:25, 3 June 2007 edit undo BilCat (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 215,750 edits Comments Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::For comparison, [http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/2417/fj1oaklandresrvyr2.jpg FJ-1] and [http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7940/2358451120015749622fovgwj7.jpg FJ-2] [[User:Drutt\|Drutt]] 14:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)		::For comparison, [http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/2417/fj1oaklandresrvyr2.jpg FJ-1] and [http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7940/2358451120015749622fovgwj7.jpg FJ-2] [[User:Drutt\|Drutt]] 14:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

			Yes, technically they are different planes, but as above, they are closely related. In addition, they share the same basic US Navy designation. Given the current lack of extensive coverage on the page, especially usable pics, keeping all the variants together is probably best. Perhaps at some point in the future a split could be made, but right now it would just turn a stubby article into 2 or 3 stubs. - [[User:BillCJ\|BillCJ]] 15:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)