Talk:Political views of Bill O'Reilly: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Quotes |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::I've removed the POV tag from the top of this article but kept the one that Dabomb691 added on the Iraq War segment. There seems to be no specific argument with the general POV of this article. There is a specific argument with the Iraq War segment. [[User:Sperril|Sperril]] 15:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC) |
::I've removed the POV tag from the top of this article but kept the one that Dabomb691 added on the Iraq War segment. There seems to be no specific argument with the general POV of this article. There is a specific argument with the Iraq War segment. [[User:Sperril|Sperril]] 15:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::There is no POV problem with the Iraq War section. Everything in it is verifiable. Sweeping O'Reilly's statements about the Iraq war under the rug to protect O'Reilly would be an NPOV violation. |
|||
== Quotes == |
== Quotes == |
||
Revision as of 23:26, 10 June 2007
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
STOP BEING SO LIBERAL WIKIPEDIA! Change you articles and make them neutral.
- Instead of complaining, why not help contribute to make the article better. Wikipedia is not supposed to be any political platform, whether liberal, conservative, or transexual nazi eskimo. MrMurph101 01:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- I really don't see where this article is supposedly "liberal" or anything else. It does in the main cite its sources, all of which can be verified. It doesn't come over as "liberal" or anything else come to that to me. Whisperwolf 01:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- The Iraq War segment seems more like an argument against Bill O'Reilly than his actual views on the subject. Dabomb691 09:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- I've removed the POV tag from the top of this article but kept the one that Dabomb691 added on the Iraq War segment. There seems to be no specific argument with the general POV of this article. There is a specific argument with the Iraq War segment. Sperril 15:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- There is no POV problem with the Iraq War section. Everything in it is verifiable. Sweeping O'Reilly's statements about the Iraq war under the rug to protect O'Reilly would be an NPOV violation.
Quotes
I removed some weasel quotes, in "secular progressives" and "culture war". There is no need to have these quotes here because of the bias they entail, trying to make his vocabulary seem outlandish and stupid. Nor is it grammatically correct. Garric 06:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)