Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Against All Authority: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:59, 11 June 2007

My !vote will depend on one thing: is Hopeless Records notable as well? If yes, then I'll cast a keep. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The answer to your question seems to be "yes". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 22:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Added a couple of references, including an All Music Guide entry. They've done multiple tours on both sides of the Atlantic, and released split records with Anti-Flag and Common Rider. Oldelpaso 20:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Oldelpaso. Hopeless Records is a fairly known label. Punkmorten 21:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because AAA kicks ass and Hopeless Records is pretty well known. Vozzon 22:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above users, article is well sourced and act is on a notable label. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 22:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per my note above and per the discussion. If the label is known and they have multiple records, it's good enough. --63.64.30.2 22:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 *'''Keep''' because AAA kicks ass and Hopeless Records is pretty well known. [[User:Vozzon|Vozzon]] 22:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' per above users, article is well sourced and act is on a notable label. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green;font-weight:bold;">Ten&nbsp;Pound&nbsp;Hammer</span>]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;<sup>((([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken&nbsp;clamshells]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter&nbsp;chirps]])))</sup> 22:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''', per my note above and per the discussion.  If the label is known and they have multiple records, it's good enough. --[[User:63.64.30.2|63.64.30.2]] 22:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)