Talk:Transformers: Generation 1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
/* When the toy line was released, it was supported by a comic book series from Marvel, an animated series and a gamut of other merchandising tie-ins. The crowning glory to its achievement was a 1986 feature film even though it performed disappointin |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This might prove useful as background for this entry [http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,2071458,00.html] ([[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 13:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)) |
This might prove useful as background for this entry [http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,2071458,00.html] ([[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 13:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)) |
||
==Movie is a glory?== |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
Why is it a "glory" if it was a failure? The hugely successful toyline made a lot of money as did the TV show in its first couple of seasons while the movie was a box office flop with a a mere $5,849,647 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092106/business). As of 1990, Transformers toys made almost $950 million (http://www.seibertron.com/infozone/articles/index.php?action=view&article_id=39), and I am certain that number is much, much higher today. In 1985 alone the toy line made Hasbro $333 million. |
Why is it a "glory" if it was a failure? The hugely successful toyline made a lot of money as did the TV show in its first couple of seasons while the movie was a box office flop with a a mere $5,849,647 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092106/business). As of 1990, Transformers toys made almost $950 million (http://www.seibertron.com/infozone/articles/index.php?action=view&article_id=39), and I am certain that number is much, much higher today. In 1985 alone the toy line made Hasbro $333 million. |
Revision as of 23:57, 27 June 2007
Transformers Unassessed | |||||||||||||||||
|
Non-robotic
Should we make a subcategory for Non-robotic characters like Dr. Arkeville,or the Sub-Atlanticans.Sochwa 20:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Sources
This might prove useful as background for this entry [1] (Emperor 13:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC))
Movie is a glory?
"When the toy line was released, it was supported by a comic book series from Marvel, an animated series and a gamut of other merchandising tie-ins. The crowning glory to its achievement was a 1986 feature film even though it performed disappointingly." Why is it a "glory" if it was a failure? The hugely successful toyline made a lot of money as did the TV show in its first couple of seasons while the movie was a box office flop with a a mere $5,849,647 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092106/business). As of 1990, Transformers toys made almost $950 million (http://www.seibertron.com/infozone/articles/index.php?action=view&article_id=39), and I am certain that number is much, much higher today. In 1985 alone the toy line made Hasbro $333 million.