Talk:Female sperm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→link dead: new section |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Erm...== |
==Erm...== |
||
There seems to have been some dispute a while back if female sperm could be used for artificial insemination, I'd just like to point out that a Y chromosome is not at all neccesary for conception, all human females on Earth have been concieved from sperm without a Y chromosome, the sperm contains an X chromosome just as a "female sperm" would. Also there were claims that none of the sources brought up the possiblity of female sperm being used this way but I skimmed through them and that simply wasnt true. I'm surprised no one caught this for so long. [[User:Velps|Velps]] 19:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC) |
There seems to have been some dispute a while back if female sperm could be used for artificial insemination, I'd just like to point out that a Y chromosome is not at all neccesary for conception, all human females on Earth have been concieved from sperm without a Y chromosome, the sperm contains an X chromosome just as a "female sperm" would. Also there were claims that none of the sources brought up the possiblity of female sperm being used this way but I skimmed through them and that simply wasnt true. I'm surprised no one caught this for so long. [[User:Velps|Velps]] 19:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
== link dead == |
|||
the link to independent.co.uk results in a 404 error |
|||
Revision as of 08:19, 28 September 2007
What the hell??
LOL, agreed man, agreed.
Erm...
There seems to have been some dispute a while back if female sperm could be used for artificial insemination, I'd just like to point out that a Y chromosome is not at all neccesary for conception, all human females on Earth have been concieved from sperm without a Y chromosome, the sperm contains an X chromosome just as a "female sperm" would. Also there were claims that none of the sources brought up the possiblity of female sperm being used this way but I skimmed through them and that simply wasnt true. I'm surprised no one caught this for so long. Velps 19:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
link dead
the link to independent.co.uk results in a 404 error