Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincenzo Perrella: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:11, 26 September 2007

Vincenzo Perrella

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. ——Moondyne 02:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article is either a vanity piece about a non-notable individual or a hoax (probably the former). I can't uncover anything of significance about the subject and I understand that there's no such thing as a "Governor's prize" in this particular jurisdiction. 4 separate WP:SPA's have updated the article. —Moondyne 01:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nothing in expected info sources (Libraries where copyright/publishing details would identify items that never hit any part of google - there are many local publications that are notable that dont hit google) to verify any of the claimed publications (that is the claimed english or italian publications) - I would be strongly for the pursuit/checkuser of the creator(s) - as the attempt at a hoax like this suggests a possible repeat offender - or an excellent example of a possible setup - the speedier it goes the better Satu Suro 02:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nomination. Renee 02:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probable hoax. Non-notable, at any rate. Google Book Search for both author and book turn up nothing.--Sethacus 03:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 :{{la|Vincenzo Perrella}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincenzo Perrella|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 September 26#{{anchorencode:Vincenzo Perrella}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 Article is either a vanity piece about a non-notable individual or a hoax (probably the former).  I can't uncover anything of significance about the subject and I understand that there's no such thing as a "Governor's prize" in this particular jurisdiction.  4 separate [[WP:SPA]]'s have updated the article. &mdash;[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 01:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' - nothing in expected info sources (Libraries where copyright/publishing details would identify items that never hit any part of google) to verify any of the claimed publications (that is the claimed english or italian publications) - I would be strongly for the pursuit/checkuser of the creator(s) - as the attempt at a hoax like this suggests a possible repeat offender - or an excellent example of a possible ''setup'' - the speedier it goes the better [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 02:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' - nothing in expected info sources (Libraries where copyright/publishing details would identify items that never hit any part of google - there are many local publications that are notable that dont hit google) to verify any of the claimed publications (that is the claimed english or italian publications) - I would be strongly for the pursuit/checkuser of the creator(s) - as the attempt at a hoax like this suggests a possible repeat offender - or an excellent example of a possible ''setup'' - the speedier it goes the better [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 02:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Delete.''' per nomination. [[User:Reneeholle|Renee]] 02:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Probable hoax. Non-notable, at any rate. Google Book Search for both author and book turn up nothing.--[[User:Sethacus|Sethacus]] 03:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)