Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincenzo Perrella: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
cmt
JarrahTree (talk | contribs)
reply
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Delete''' Probable hoax. Non-notable, at any rate. Google Book Search for both author and book turn up nothing.--[[User:Sethacus|Sethacus]] 03:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Probable hoax. Non-notable, at any rate. Google Book Search for both author and book turn up nothing.--[[User:Sethacus|Sethacus]] 03:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - I find it difficult to believe that the ''[[West Australian]]'' would do a book review on their page 2. —[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 03:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - I find it difficult to believe that the ''[[West Australian]]'' would do a book review on their page 2. —[[User talk:Moondyne|''Moondyne'']] 03:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Reply''' - they have not done so in the last ten years [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 03:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:16, 26 September 2007

Vincenzo Perrella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article is either a vanity piece about a non-notable individual or a hoax (probably the former). I can't uncover anything of significance about the subject and I understand that there's no such thing as a "Governor's prize" in this particular jurisdiction. 4 separate WP:SPA's have updated the article. —Moondyne 01:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]