Jump to content

User talk:Zero Gravity/Archive4: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BetacommandBot (talk | contribs)
your Non-Free image upload
BetacommandBot (talk | contribs)
your Non-Free image upload
Line 471: Line 471:


If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 19:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 19:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free media (Image:20elregresodelcondor.png)==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important blue.svg|25px]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:20elregresodelcondor.png]]'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, it is currently [[Wikipedia:Orphan|orphaned]], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You may add it back]] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 19:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:45, 10 October 2007



Archive
Archives
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3


Your advise is needed here

Hello! I hope you are feeling great. I would like you to view my comments here. Your views on this matter would be much appreciated as well! --Siva1979Talk to me 03:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted your edit to Hugo Chávez

Hello, Fernando. I reverted your edit to Hugo Chávez. I agree the code helps dealing with the long reference list but just check the printable version[1]. Scroll down to the end and I'm sure you will get my point. JRSP 03:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting I didn't notice the secondary effects of the code. --F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 05:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if I get other sources, can the article stay? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can add the sources, but what's gonna happen to the orphan status? he's not notable enough. --F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 03:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he's very famous (Christian community). The reason I added his website as the "main" sources is because I thought it might of helped (apparently not). But, I'll try to see to make his article notable. Oh, and I have nothing to do with him as you stated. P.S. What is gonna happen to the orphan status? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


DYK: Festival of the Flowers

Updated DYK query On 18 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Festival of the Flowers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
--PFHLai 08:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Norte del Valle Cartel

I was compiling some information regarding the Norte del Valle Cartel. I am not sure how interested you are in them, they share some members with the Cali Cartel. Unfortunately I am in the middle of a dispute and being falsely accused of being someone else. From what I understand of policy they will remove my edits to the articles I created and I will not be able to edit anymore, if this persons vindictive allegations are seen as true. I dumped all the information I had been saving for the article into a subpage NV Cartel. I would reccomend saving it somewhere if you find any of it useful as it would be such as waste of hard work and could go to improving the articles greatly. Please keep an eye out on the Cali Cartel article as well. I have seen one member of this group remove individual edits of a banned user, effectively destroying an article.

If it does go through and I do end up banned/blocked (not sure what the difference is), then I just wanted to drop this information off to you and say thank you. You have done amazing work on the articles related to Colombia. I do not speak Spanish but I felt working on these articles was my own way of getting in touch with my heritage, however little sense that makes. Thank for your contributions to the Colombia related articles and to cleaning up my bad grammar and punctuation. --SevenOfDiamonds 13:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm Shield187 I made the NVC page what it is...With all the Cartel Crackdowns from reseacrh....Key Members at Large mean the ones who have not been captured.....Cartel Crackdowns are news headlines of important blows to the cartel....Why are you erasing my entry for Montoya under Cartel Crackdown? Just leave Varela and Renteria at At Large since they are the only two members of importance not to be caught. Also, there is no more Cali Cartel....Some Members started in The Cali Cartel and then started the NVC when the cartel was broken up...Thats why some bio for some members say started in the cali cartel. Merging the two is not ncessary. Don't assume to know more than me becuase you don't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shield187 (talkcontribs) 21:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh please.. You could have "made" it but you don't own it.. don't try to be aggressive here and try to reach a concensus instead. And never assume you know it all... big mistake... I understand what you did and how the article was coming.. I really think the article needs some restructuring as it is.. it's in some way not encyclopedic. WHO is talking about merging?? I rather think that each individual needs its own bio if notable enough or if there is information about them out there.. --F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 21:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. I think the page could use some restructuring, the problem is they havent become as well known as the Cali/Medellin cartels. This leaves little in terms of over all structure, organization and assets. I have plenty on companies closed in relation to person X or person Y. The problem is it is often not listed as Cartel assets due to the structure, they are more of a group of people with similar goals, under a united name, its not like Pablo and Medellin. I will try to compile anymore I can find and restructure as best I can. As for Montoya he was arrested today. --SevenOfDiamonds 02:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I attempted to rewrite it, looks like too much text. Was thinking of splitting it, but not sure what criteria to use to do so. I was thinking years, but some sections would be very short. Let me know if you think of anything. --SevenOfDiamonds 03:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Please opine over the merge of valijagate to maletinazo so I can consolidate the text before you continue making changes. The discussion is at Talk:valijagate. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 07:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:19mividadmusical.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:19mividadmusical.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:27, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

new policy

any thoughts about this? Slrubenstein | Talk 22:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Andreaecheverriaterciopelados.png

I have tagged Image:Andreaecheverriaterciopelados.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 01:21, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Adm19logo.png

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Adm19logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 12:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Alcaldiasantamarta.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Alcaldiasantamarta.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I've been carried away that I forgot to send the e-mail verification to Permissions@wikimedia.org. I will do so. But you still seem to attack me by claiming that I'm promoting him. I'm not promoting him, I'm just writing an article. And in my opinion, its not the best written article I've edit. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:52, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:31lavoz.png

Thanks for uploading Image:31lavoz.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:25, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carolina Herrera (entertainer)

I've declined your speedy deletion request on Carolina Herrera (entertainer) - while it may only have one source, that source is the BBC so it's unlikely to be a hoax, and it contains a clear assertion of notability. If you feel it ought to be deleted, by all means submit it to [WP:AFD|AFD]], but I'm fairly certain that as it stands any discussion would result in a clear keep.iridescent (talk to me!) 21:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pabloescopaint.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pabloescopaint.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank u

Thanks a lot for The WikiProject Colombia Barnstar. It means a lot for me. I wonder if you could help me with an issue. some days ago I created an article about the development of a colombian breed of dog through the raising of criollo dogs, under the title Porcham Terrier. the article was tagged as suspicious of hoax, I added aditional references, for some days there were no new entries in the talk page, and then suddenly the article was deleted without discussion or consensus. ( 19:36, 20 September 2007 User:DragonflySixtyseven deleted "Porcham Terrier" ‎ (apparent hoax) ) I wrote to DragonflySixtyseven, (without response yet). The colombian dog breed has no international official recognition still, but many dog breeds worldwide are in the same status, and the facts registred in the article are real. Criollo dogs are very popular pets in Colombia and many kennels are working in the development of a more uniform criollo breed. Koven.rm 17:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

¡Gracias!

I'm not so sure I deserve this barnstar award (yet) but it feels really good to be remembered by someone around here Fernando.

Thanks for asking about my studies, I did my "sustentación de tesis" last Friday (it's the final stage of the thesis, where you orally present the project to the faculty and the professors examine you regarding the subject) and I got a 4.0! :) ...finally, I'm over with it, you have no idea how good that feels... I still have a few exams to go and that will take a couple more months (probably until easter next year).

I'm planning on taking on the Cartagena de Indias article this Christmas. Anyways, I shouldn't be spending much time at Wikipedia right now so....cheers :)Rosa 18:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

btw, the Colombian Wikiproject Barnstar looks very good. Thanks for creating it. Rosa 18:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to thank so many people, God, my mother...

YAY thanks for the award! if the point of it was motivation it worked, now i wanna contribute more again, but yeha, thanks!mijotoba 00:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

article

hi again, thanks for your reply. In relation with the points debated, colombian criollo dogs are not essentially pariah dogs since this are feral (however some criollo dogs can be feral but most of them are pets). This article from Bogota health secretary has some statistics indicating that the criollo dogs represent over 50% of the total domestic pets and they are associated with cultural values such as loyalty and reliability as guardian dogs in a higher degree than more conventional dog breeds[1]. Recently, criollo dogs have been admited in dog agility competitions.[2]

Since criollo dogs are the result of several generations of crossbreed, cannot be stablished the kind of dogs that were crossed to form the "porcham terrier", but the local geographic, climatic and cultural features of the country have settled this dog breed in a terrier-like type, which is recogniceable from other types of simply Mixed-breed dogs or dog crossbreeds found worldwide. Many of the dog breeds articles (such as Hamiltonstövare, Cão da Serra de Aires, Chart Polski, Ratonero Bodeguero Andaluz, etc) have no references at all and almost no content. At least this one has some. Anyhow, the article recognized that the international kennel clubs did not have an official breed standard for this kind of dog (same as for many others in the dog list ) but, still it has a cultural relevancy. Again, thanks a lot.Koven.rm 18:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

templates

give me a second on the template--i am still working on it. I wish ou would have mentioned this on the talk page before changing it. I could have helped you. Again, please give me a few minutes.Travb (talk) 08:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok..


See: Template:Colombia_conflict usually to avoid edit wars I get stuck spending way to much time on projects I no longer have much interest in. I built the Template:Colombia_conflict based on the WW2 template you recommended. I replaced my old template (with the same name) and orphaned your Template:Timeline of Colombian armed conflict which is no longer necessary. I kept Template:US involvement in Colombia because it is different enough from the main Template:Colombia_conflict. If you want to make the colombia conflict template show on certain pages, type, {{Colombia conflict|state=uncollapsed}} I made all the pages have the template be collapsed.

there is a lot of work to do on that template. Please see the talk page for suggestions.

Please, Please, Please no edit wars, and please consider Template:Timeline of Colombian armed conflict dead and dont re-add it to pages. You forced me to make the old Template:Colombia_conflict dead. I like oyur attitude, and I really think we can comprimise without involving third parties.

thanks for pushing me to do projects I really didnt want to do. I learned some more about templates today. Travb (talk) 00:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikicookie award

Thanks F3rn4nd0, for all your work on Colombia. Enjoy the cookie :) Travb (talk) 00:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrade the award

The WikiProject Colombia Award
This WikiProject Colombia Award is awarded to User:F3rn4nd0 for your tireless work on Colombia articles, great job! Travb (talk) 21:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Woah! thanks.. I humbly accept it.. --F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 05:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I upgraded this to Template:WikiProject Colombia Award fitting that the person who created it is the first person who is awarded it.
You are welcome to add any of your new work to a portal I created:
Portal:Colombia/New article announcements‎
I added much of your recent work there. Travb (talk) 21:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
thanks again travb.. I'm also aware of WP:COL new article page.. I'll add my contributions there from now on..--F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 07:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sonofmoncayo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Sonofmoncayo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Santiago Martinez Delgado

Hi you nominated this article for a good article review; but someone took it out with out a reason????? can you review this matter... it looks to me like vandalism. Regards [[[User:74.163.146.35|74.163.146.35]] 14:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)]

thank u

Thanks for the barnstar, i´m glad you liked the article. Koven.rm 19:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Andresescobaratlnacional.png

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Andresescobaratlnacional.png. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 12:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Firstsergeantcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD i3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:25, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Generalcolnalpol.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Generalcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD i3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Intendantcolnalpol.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Intendantcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mapmunicipiovalledupar.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mapmunicipiovalledupar.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:COLPES20000.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:COLPES20000.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cesar1seg.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cesar1seg.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2006afichefestivalvallenato.jpg

I have tagged Image:2006afichefestivalvallenato.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Departamentocesar.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Departamentocesar.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Consueloaraujo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Escudosincelejo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Escudosincelejo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Sucremap.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sucremap.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Escudocartagena.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Escudocartagena.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Intendantinchiefcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Commissionercolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Subcommissionercolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Sub-intendantcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Patrollercolnalpol.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Patrollercolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

I´m sorry. Maybe you should put a {{Expert-subject}} tag. in the article.

That could be an option, you can also do some research about the topic. As soon as I get more time I'll start cleaning up too. --F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 19:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Image:Brigadiergeneralcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:49, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Captaincolnalpol.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Captaincolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 05:56, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Colonelcolnalpol.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Colonelcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 06:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Majorgeneralcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 06:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Lieutenantcolonelcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 06:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Majorcolnalpol.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Majorcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 06:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Lieutenantcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 06:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Sub-lieutenantcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 06:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing a great job Videmus Omnia keep it up, hooahh! hooahh!--F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 16:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:30denuevoconmigente.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:30denuevoconmigente.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:48, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:4lalocura.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:4lalocura.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Seargentmajorcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 18:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Vice-firstsergeantcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 18:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Secondsergeantcolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 18:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Privatefirstclasscolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 18:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Privatesecondclasscolnalpol.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD I3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Videmus Omnia Talk 18:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:10todoesparati.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:10todoesparati.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:11cantando.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:11cantando.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:12elmundo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:12elmundo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:13vallenato.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:13vallenato.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:14brindoconelalma.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:14brindoconelalma.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:15incontenibles.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:15incontenibles.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:16ganoelfolklore.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:16ganoelfolklore.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:5dosgrandes.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:5dosgrandes.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:48, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:17elcondorherido.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:17elcondorherido.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:18cantaconmigo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:18cantaconmigo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:6losprofesionales.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:6losprofesionales.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:7tuserenata.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:7tuserenata.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:8paramifanaticada.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:8paramifanaticada.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:9conmuchoestilo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:9conmuchoestilo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:20elregresodelcondor.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:20elregresodelcondor.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]