Talk:Robber baron (industrialist): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:19, 11 November 2007

Business Unassessed

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Robber baron (industrialist) was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.
Review: No date specified. To provide a date use: {{DelistedGA|insert date in any format here}}.

The use of the word "allegedly" is necessary to make it clear that some businessmen called "robber barons" did not, on examination, use tactics different from those who did not receive the label.

I accept that "allegedly" could have been applied to others (on the specifics of your argument, so you're only a criminal if convicted?). However, the term does not work as a qualifier, because using it means that any application of the term was either unfounded or frivolous. IMHO using this term would be POV. My revision takes a "it was perceived" line. 203.198.237.30 08:30, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Business magnate, Entrepreneur, Industrialist...and others

There is substantial overlap between Business magnate, Entrepreneur, Industrialist and Robber baron (industrialist). Any thoughts on a possible merger, if not of articles, then at least of the redundant concepts and content which appears across these articles? Should one of these be the "main" article on the subject matter? I personally think "yes", but there does not seem to be a strong contender. There is businessperson (currently a mere substub), but the term lacks the connotations invoked by industrialist/magnate/mogul/tycoon etc. 203.198.237.30 03:43, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of Industralist into Business Magnate now proposed. 203.198.237.30 03:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't there be a source for the "minor fractions" of their wealth comment? I'd imagine some gave more than others. I also question the inclusion of the "common good". Perhaps adding a "perceived" to the sentence? --24.154.234.132 01:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted Good Article

There are no references, and the article is not particularly comprehensive. Pointlessness 20:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Instances of bad behavior

This article desperately needs concrete examples of the kind of brutish and/or illegal behavior which warranted this kind of label.

1830s study

Does anybody have anymore information about the study of 303 executives? I can't find any source cited in Howard Zinn's book. 66.193.220.126 17:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that statistic is at least out of place. If anybody wants to analyze "the american dream," a link to that article would be sufficient. I am removing it. If someone wants to restore it, find it's actual source, and add a counter example to balance it. Confounded bridge 16:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)confoundedbridge[reply]

Why isn't J.P. Morgan in the list? And Mellon?

He's mentioned in the article, but not in the list. And what about Mellon?

Who on earth is this Sidener guy?

Someone should probably take this off once they've check it out, though I'm pretty certain it's a joke. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flankergeek (talk • contribs) 19:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Ford?

I can agree with every name on this list except Henry Ford. When was Ford called a "Robber Baron?" By whom? In what context? Ford was actually considered to be quite progressive during the era when the last of the Robber Barons reigned. The Five-Dollar-Day was the epitome of progressive business-labor relations (even if the Sociological Department wasn't). And when Ford did become a tight-fisted, public-be-damned, despicable tycoon calling him a "Robber Baron" would be passé. Indeed, at the time that Ford was this way, Matthew Josephson was using the term to describe men that were by then dead a generation. Wealth alone is not a criterion for inclusion on this list.

I say Ford should be deleted from the list. --RedJ 17 00:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 == Who on earth is this Sidener guy? ==
 Someone should probably take this off once they've check it out, though I'm pretty certain it's a joke.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Flankergeek|Flankergeek]] ([[User talk:Flankergeek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Flankergeek|contribs]]) 19:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+==Henry Ford?==
+I can agree with every name on this list except Henry Ford.  When was Ford called a "Robber Baron?"  By whom?  In what context?  Ford was actually considered to be quite progressive during the era when the last of the Robber Barons reigned.  The Five-Dollar-Day was the epitome of progressive business-labor relations (even if the Sociological Department wasn't).  And when Ford did become a tight-fisted, public-be-damned, despicable tycoon calling him a "Robber Baron" would be passé.  Indeed, at the time that Ford was this way, Matthew Josephson was using the term to describe men that were by then dead a generation.  Wealth alone is not a criterion for inclusion on this list.
+I say Ford should be deleted from the list.  --[[User:RedJ 17|RedJ 17]] 00:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)