Talk:Strong NP-completeness: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 80.229.163.140 - "→Merge: " |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A list of strongly NP-hard problems would be fine! The article does not |
|||
even mention only one example. |
|||
==Merge== |
==Merge== |
||
I am excited to see if this article will contain anything that can't easily be put into other NP articles. I suggest merge... [[User:Medico80|Medico80]] 22:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC) |
I am excited to see if this article will contain anything that can't easily be put into other NP articles. I suggest merge... [[User:Medico80|Medico80]] 22:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 06:22, 16 October 2009
A list of strongly NP-hard problems would be fine! The article does not even mention only one example.
Merge
I am excited to see if this article will contain anything that can't easily be put into other NP articles. I suggest merge... Medico80 22:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, umm...a good question. As the one who created it I wouldn't have any problem with merging the information into the NP-completeness article; I just saw some article linking to this (non-existent) page so thought creating it would be a good idea. If the info is put into the NP-completeness article, should we make this one redirect there? Flaxter 02:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that is the way to do it. Cheers :-) Medico80 19:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.163.140 (talk) 20:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)