Talk:Dotfuscator: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:34, 19 March 2008

Superior protection? That is biased right there. I demand that phrase be replaced and competing products be listed somewhere on this page. 68.236.176.23 17:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reader demands it! We should probably do it then! OR ELSE! 148.70.194.2 15:54, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not just the reader, but WP:NPOV and WP:ADVERT arguably come into play. It needs to be improved. At the very least, the contested claims need to be surrounded by language making it clear that they are the manufacturer's assertions, not objective, universally agree-on facts. And the or else is that the page could be AfD'ed. 66.32.67.203 17:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the page, I believe it's NPOV enough to remove the advert block, more updates to come at a later time. MLetterle 23:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a reference to msdn verifying inclusion. Should the reference block be removed. Gmt767 (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:53, 22 October 2007 edit MLetterle (talk \| contribs) 46 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:34, 19 March 2008 edit undo Gmt767 (talk \| contribs) 63 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I updated the page, I believe it's NPOV enough to remove the advert block, more updates to come at a later time. [[User:MLetterle\|MLetterle]] 23:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)		I updated the page, I believe it's NPOV enough to remove the advert block, more updates to come at a later time. [[User:MLetterle\|MLetterle]] 23:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

			I added a reference to msdn verifying inclusion. Should the reference block be removed. [[User:Gmt767\|Gmt767]] ([[User talk:Gmt767\|talk]]) 13:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)