Jump to content

User talk:MiFeinberg: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiFeinberg (talk | contribs)
Pesty, isn't he?
Feedler2 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:


Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I think I found a good source that refutes the JPFO claim of the Nazi origin of the Gun Control Act, so I think we can balance the controversy section with some historical facts. See my comment at the bottom of [[Talk:Gun Control Act of 1968]]. — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]]) 22:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I think I found a good source that refutes the JPFO claim of the Nazi origin of the Gun Control Act, so I think we can balance the controversy section with some historical facts. See my comment at the bottom of [[Talk:Gun Control Act of 1968]]. — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[User talk:Malik Shabazz|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]]) 22:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

He is! [[User:Feedler2|Feedler2]] 20:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:10, 24 October 2007

William Henry Clarence

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from William Henry Clarence. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BaseballDetective 04:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good eye spotting that error on the William Henry Clarence page. But please becareful when editing so the page is not blanked. Pages that go 100% blank catch the eyes of editors—like me—and admins and might cause problems in the future. But your instincts are correct. Good work! BaseballDetective 05:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of massacre in Glock 19, Glock, and Walther P22 articles?

There is a debate at the Glock 19, Glock, and Walther P22 articles about whether the Virginia Tech massacre should be mentioned in those articles. The sentence in question is: "Cho Seung-hui, the Virginia Tech student who allegedly killed 32 fellow students in the U.S. state of Virginia on April 16, 2007, used a Glock 19 and a .22 caliber Walther P22 handgun." I invite you to participate in those articles. Astruc 20:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walther P22 dispute

An article which you have edited, Talk:Walther P22#Request for Comment: Walther P22 – is involved in a dispute requiring inputs from editors to develop a consensus for editors to follow on whether or not mention of the Virginia Tech Massacre should be mentioned in the firearm article, or if mention in the VT Massacre article of the firearms used, with a link back to the Walther P22 article, is adequate. Thank you. Yaf 22:19, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


No problem

Its one thing to have a dissagreement, its another to take such action against someone. You got singled out for personal reasons and I found that to be unfair. Best advice, try not to take things too personaly. Thats advice I should take more often as it is. Alyeska 18:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walther P22 disputes continues

Hello. The discussion of whether to include a mention of the Virginia Tech massacre at the Walther P22 article continues. Earlier, a compromise was reached to include a mention of the Viriginia Tech massacre in a "See Also" section of this article, but now that idea is being debated. Care to weigh in? The Walther P22 is being discussed here. Griot 16:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I think I found a good source that refutes the JPFO claim of the Nazi origin of the Gun Control Act, so I think we can balance the controversy section with some historical facts. See my comment at the bottom of Talk:Gun Control Act of 1968. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 22:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He is! Feedler2 20:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]