Jump to content

Witherspoon v. Illinois: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
added link
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m Standard headings &/or gen fixes. using AWB
Line 28: Line 28:
* [[List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 391]]
* [[List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 391]]


==External link==
==External links==
* [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=391&page=510 Full text opinion from Findlaw.com]
* [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=391&page=510 Full text opinion from Findlaw.com]


{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}
[[Category:1968 in law]]
[[Category:1968 in law]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]]
Line 37: Line 36:
[[Category:United States Eighth Amendment case law]]
[[Category:United States Eighth Amendment case law]]
[[Category:United States Fourteenth Amendment case law]]
[[Category:United States Fourteenth Amendment case law]]

{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}

Revision as of 13:39, 27 November 2007

Witherspoon v. Illinois
Argued April 24, 1968
Decided June 3, 1968
Full case nameWitherspoon v. Illinois
Citations391 U.S. 510 (more)
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Abe Fortas · Thurgood Marshall
Case opinion
Per curiam
Laws applied
Ill. Rev. Stat., c. 38 s. 743, U.S. Const. amends. VIII, XIV
Overruled by
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976)

Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968), was a U.S. Supreme Court case where the court was asked to decide whether a state statute providing the state unlimited challenge for cause of jurors who might have any objection to the death penalty. The court decided that the statute, in effect, gave too much bias in favor of the prosecution.

The Court said,

Whatever else might be said of capital punishment, it is at least clear that its imposition by a hanging jury cannot be squared with the Constitution. The State of Illinois has stacked the deck against the petitioner. To execute this death sentence would deprive him of his life without due process of law.

The decision in this case would cause the Supreme Court of California to order a retrial on the penalty phase in the 1972 case of California v. Anderson, and when the case was heard for the third time, would find the imposition of the Death Penalty was unconstitutional on the grounds of the penalty being Cruel and Unusual in violation of the State Constitution. The decision would become national in scale when the U.S. Supreme Court also in 1972 ruled in Furman v. Georgia that all death penalty cases were in violation of the 8th Amendment's prohibition on Cruel and Unusual punishment.

See also