Jump to content

Talk:Jeremy (given name): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
info
Qzm (talk | contribs)
banner
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Anthroponymy|class=start}}

==History of page [[Jeremy (name)]]==
==History of page [[Jeremy (name)]]==
*At 18:41, 18 November 2007 [[User:Jeremy Bolwell]] created page [[Jeremy (name)]] by copy-and-pasting from [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jeremy&oldid=170108504 the 15:26 8 November 2007 version of page <u>Jeremy</u>], thus recovering deleted information to make a splitoff page. [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] ([[User talk:Anthony Appleyard|talk]]) 10:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
*At 18:41, 18 November 2007 [[User:Jeremy Bolwell]] created page [[Jeremy (name)]] by copy-and-pasting from [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jeremy&oldid=170108504 the 15:26 8 November 2007 version of page <u>Jeremy</u>], thus recovering deleted information to make a splitoff page. [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] ([[User talk:Anthony Appleyard|talk]]) 10:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:44, 14 September 2009

WikiProject iconAnthroponymy List‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

History of page Jeremy (name)

History merge request

The content of this article was improperly cut and pasted (by me) from Jeremy. I used this version as a basis for the article. Could we incorporate the history of that article into this one, since most of the diffs of that page involved building this list of Jeremys. Once the merge is complete, I can do some copyediting and cleanup. Thanks, The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 22:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since Jeremy appears to be continuing to be an article, there's no need to merge. You seem to have done a proper fork, attributing the source in your edit summary. To put it another way, if I did the merge, the history for Jeremy would no longer be at that article. You can't clone histories. --W.marsh 22:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I know what you mean, but I was thinking the history should be preserved along with the article whose content was edited more heavily in the history. In other words, we'd be losing less history pertaining to the content of the Jeremy disambiguation article by moving the article here than we would if the history showing how Jeremy (name) came to be were obscured. I'm not sure I'm explaining myself very well.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 22:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't think it really matters... I think we meet the requirements of the GFDL right now. --W.marsh 22:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]