Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampire (Buffyverse): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Vampire (Buffyverse): afd disc del |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Encountered this when closing an AFD on a duplicate article to this one. The article consists nearly entirely of in-universe language inferred from episodes of the show, and is almost completely [[WP:V|unverified]] [[WP:OR|original research]]. [[WP:NOT#OR|Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought]], and [[WP:NOT#PLOT|Wikipedia is not a plot guide]]. [[User:Coredesat|Core]][[User talk:Coredesat|<font color="#457541">desat</font>]] 03:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC) |
Encountered this when closing an AFD on a duplicate article to this one. The article consists nearly entirely of in-universe language inferred from episodes of the show, and is almost completely [[WP:V|unverified]] [[WP:OR|original research]]. [[WP:NOT#OR|Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought]], and [[WP:NOT#PLOT|Wikipedia is not a plot guide]]. [[User:Coredesat|Core]][[User talk:Coredesat|<font color="#457541">desat</font>]] 03:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''': Per the nom's reasons (every single one). - [[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] ([[User talk:Rjd0060|talk]]) 04:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''': Per the nom's reasons (every single one). - [[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] ([[User talk:Rjd0060|talk]]) 04:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' This piece of [[WP:CRUFT|fancrufty]] original research is not only unverified (not a reason to delete), it's largely [[WP:V|unverifiable]] (which ''is'' a justification for deletion). I don't see how a sourced article on this topic is possible without [[WP:SYN|synthesis]], as I doubt any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] deal with the topic of "the Buffyverse vampires". (BTW: The fan-derived term "Buffyverse" has no place on Wikipedia.) <font color="green">[[User:Szyslak|szyslak]]</font> 09:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:01, 28 November 2007
- Vampire (Buffyverse) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Encountered this when closing an AFD on a duplicate article to this one. The article consists nearly entirely of in-universe language inferred from episodes of the show, and is almost completely unverified original research. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought, and Wikipedia is not a plot guide. Coredesat 03:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Per the nom's reasons (every single one). - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This piece of fancrufty original research is not only unverified (not a reason to delete), it's largely unverifiable (which is a justification for deletion). I don't see how a sourced article on this topic is possible without synthesis, as I doubt any reliable sources deal with the topic of "the Buffyverse vampires". (BTW: The fan-derived term "Buffyverse" has no place on Wikipedia.) szyslak 09:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)