Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampire (Buffyverse): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DGG (talk | contribs)
Line 6: Line 6:
*'''Delete''': Per the nom's reasons (every single one). - [[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] ([[User talk:Rjd0060|talk]]) 04:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': Per the nom's reasons (every single one). - [[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] ([[User talk:Rjd0060|talk]]) 04:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' This piece of [[WP:CRUFT|fancrufty]] original research is not only unverified (not a reason to delete), it's largely [[WP:V|unverifiable]] (which ''is'' a justification for deletion). I don't see how a sourced article on this topic is possible without [[WP:SYN|synthesis]], as I doubt any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] deal with the topic of "the Buffyverse vampires". (BTW: The fan-derived term "Buffyverse" has no place on Wikipedia.) <font color="green">[[User:Szyslak|szyslak]]</font> 09:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' This piece of [[WP:CRUFT|fancrufty]] original research is not only unverified (not a reason to delete), it's largely [[WP:V|unverifiable]] (which ''is'' a justification for deletion). I don't see how a sourced article on this topic is possible without [[WP:SYN|synthesis]], as I doubt any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] deal with the topic of "the Buffyverse vampires". (BTW: The fan-derived term "Buffyverse" has no place on Wikipedia.) <font color="green">[[User:Szyslak|szyslak]]</font> 09:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''comment''' I suppose nobody has ever made a reference to the fact that the series deals with Vampires? And I suppose our rule is that any word originated by fans or fan fiction is unmentionable on WP. Just what universe are we in, or does in-universe mean excluding anything written in our own? '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 04:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:12, 29 November 2007

Vampire (Buffyverse) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Encountered this when closing an AFD on a duplicate article to this one. The article consists nearly entirely of in-universe language inferred from episodes of the show, and is almost completely unverified original research. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought, and Wikipedia is not a plot guide. Coredesat 03:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Per the nom's reasons (every single one). - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This piece of fancrufty original research is not only unverified (not a reason to delete), it's largely unverifiable (which is a justification for deletion). I don't see how a sourced article on this topic is possible without synthesis, as I doubt any reliable sources deal with the topic of "the Buffyverse vampires". (BTW: The fan-derived term "Buffyverse" has no place on Wikipedia.) szyslak 09:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment I suppose nobody has ever made a reference to the fact that the series deals with Vampires? And I suppose our rule is that any word originated by fans or fan fiction is unmentionable on WP. Just what universe are we in, or does in-universe mean excluding anything written in our own? DGG (talk) 04:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]