Talk:Bids for the 2016 Summer Olympics: Difference between revisions
→Table layout: new section |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Azerbaijan Europe not Asia== |
==Azerbaijan Europe not Asia== |
||
The IOC lists the NOC of Azerbaijan in the EOC (Europe) and not in the OCA (Asia). This needs to be fixed. I would fix it, but i'm not to good with the editing of wikipedia. So yeah, it would be good if someone could change it.[[User:The sound|The sound]] ([[User talk:The sound|talk]]) 10:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC) |
The IOC lists the NOC of Azerbaijan in the EOC (Europe) and not in the OCA (Asia). This needs to be fixed. I would fix it, but i'm not to good with the editing of wikipedia. So yeah, it would be good if someone could change it.[[User:The sound|The sound]] ([[User talk:The sound|talk]]) 10:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Table layout == |
|||
What is the point of the odd table layout for applicant cities? It does not seem to add anything and complicates editing and navigation (it would make more sense for each city to be a sub-section). [[User:Pimlottc|Pimlottc]] ([[User talk:Pimlottc|talk]]) 14:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:23, 6 February 2008
Olympics Stub‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Balanced view
I reverted some presumably good intentioned edit by user:Honestjeff who primarily deleted any negative information about the Chicago bid. I believe the goal of this page is to present information, both the positive and negative, about the bids (as long as they are sourced), regardless of where a person is rooting for. If others disagree, please let me know. Thanks--Cbradshaw (talk) 06:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- I also must mention that marking deletions of 500 bytes as a "minor" edit is not honest, but perhaps it was a newbie mistake?--Cbradshaw (talk) 06:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Azerbaijan Europe not Asia
The IOC lists the NOC of Azerbaijan in the EOC (Europe) and not in the OCA (Asia). This needs to be fixed. I would fix it, but i'm not to good with the editing of wikipedia. So yeah, it would be good if someone could change it.The sound (talk) 10:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Table layout
What is the point of the odd table layout for applicant cities? It does not seem to add anything and complicates editing and navigation (it would make more sense for each city to be a sub-section). Pimlottc (talk) 14:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)