Talk:LTP induction: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:19, 17 April 2007

Merge with long-term potentiation

I'd rather not merge it. In reading up on Wikipedia style it seems that it is preferable to keep articles relatively short. The main LTP article is kind of long. What I was attempting here was to split some of the details off into separate articles as the style suggestions suggest. This current article, "LTP induction" is going to get a lot longer than it is currently. I've just begun to write on it. So I think it will be less and less appropriate to merge it into the main LTP article. Synaptidude 28 June 2005 17:08 (UTC)

Agreed; it shouldn't be merged. --David Iberri (talk) 17:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NMDA?

Why no mention of NMDA receptors.... only AMPA.....? Puzzling.

Because

I've not finished writing it yet.

Synaptidude 29 June 2005 16:03 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+==Merge with [[long-term potentiation]]==
 I'd rather not merge it.  In reading up on Wikipedia style it seems that it is preferable to keep articles relatively short.  The main LTP article is kind of long.  What I was attempting here was to split some of the details off into separate articles as the style suggestions suggest.  This current article, "LTP induction" is going to get a lot longer than it is currently.  I've just begun to write on it.  So I think it will be less and less appropriate to merge it into the main LTP article.  [[User:Synaptidude|Synaptidude]] 28 June 2005 17:08 (UTC)
+:Agreed; it shouldn't be merged. --[[User:Diberri|David Iberri]] ([[User talk:Diberri|talk]]) 17:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 == NMDA? ==