User talk:76.87.47.110

Now whitewashing on wiki, please.

Reading is educational, you might like it.

Reading Harper's is educatinal. You might like it. Or, (note the semicolon), reading Harper's is educational; you might like it. Your use of the comma is not grammatically correct.71.139.1.184 02:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

He's a good spelerrrrr, an experrted.

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to United States presidential election, 2000, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. Anastrophe (talk) 02:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello 76.87.47.110, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Writtenonsand (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

You might want to create an account. (Wikipedia:Why_create_an_account?) -- Writtenonsand (talk) 20:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Your comment regarding WP:CIVIL on User talk:Calton

Please review WP:TRIVIA. Regarding your post on User talk:Calton: your claim that the user has shown lack of WP:CIVILITY because he was removing trivia is unwarranted. If you have received communications from Calton that suggests lack of civility, please link us the places where the user has expressed incivility. Editors may from time to time perform radical changes as part of WP:BOLD, but if other editors feel that the new change is unsuitable for the article, editors on Wikipedia have the right (under certain policies and criteria) to revert changes (good faith edits or not) on articles. I strongly suggest that you sign up for an account and review the many article and interaction guidelines on Wikipedia. If you have any questions, please see WP:HELP. Happy Editing! :-) - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 06:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Responded on user's talk page. 76.87.47.110 (talk) 10:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Incoherent response from Calton after incivility warning

Your advice has noted, logged, and round-filed, J-M. Thanks for stopping by again! --Calton | Talk 07:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Block

This IP address has been blocked from Wikipedia as an IP used by the indefinitely blocked Telogen. To appeal this block, please follow the procedure given to you on the block notice's page.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 09:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

76.87.47.110 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have no idea what this is about. It is virtually impossible that I could be this user I've never heard of. I couldn't be anyone else because I started sharing this apartment within the last month. I would like to understand why this is happening. I am requesting this unblock because there is no reason whatsoever for it. I attest that my statements are true. If check user can and is used to verify this information, why am I being blocked? This makes no sense to me. Thank you, 76.87.47.110 (talk) 10:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I have no idea what this is about. It is virtually impossible that I could be this user I've never heard of. I couldn't be anyone else because I started sharing this apartment within the last month. I would like to understand why this is happening. I am requesting this unblock because there is no reason whatsoever for it. I attest that my statements are true. If check user can and is used to verify this information, why am I being blocked? This makes no sense to me. Thank you, [[Special:Contributions/76.87.47.110|76.87.47.110]] ([[User talk:76.87.47.110#top|talk]]) 10:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I have no idea what this is about. It is virtually impossible that I could be this user I've never heard of. I couldn't be anyone else because I started sharing this apartment within the last month. I would like to understand why this is happening. I am requesting this unblock because there is no reason whatsoever for it. I attest that my statements are true. If check user can and is used to verify this information, why am I being blocked? This makes no sense to me. Thank you, [[Special:Contributions/76.87.47.110|76.87.47.110]] ([[User talk:76.87.47.110#top|talk]]) 10:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I have no idea what this is about. It is virtually impossible that I could be this user I've never heard of. I couldn't be anyone else because I started sharing this apartment within the last month. I would like to understand why this is happening. I am requesting this unblock because there is no reason whatsoever for it. I attest that my statements are true. If check user can and is used to verify this information, why am I being blocked? This makes no sense to me. Thank you, [[Special:Contributions/76.87.47.110|76.87.47.110]] ([[User talk:76.87.47.110#top|talk]]) 10:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}