User talk:SteveO/Archive 3

Archives
November 2005 – January 2007 February 2007 – June 2007

1915 FA Cup Final

SteveO Thanks for your info about the fancy programmes handed out to the players at the cup final. When I have finished the Chelsea player stubs I'll work it into the text. One question which you may be able to help with: On the Chelsea History page the first goal in the 1915 cup final is blamed on a mistake by Molyneux but in the Guardian report and I quote "He did many fine things in the match and in the case of the three goals scored he was quite helpless" Do you have a source for for his "mistake" It would be great to include a couple of other sources Thanks Gmac101 (talk) 14:04, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with this article and your kind comment on my talk page, I've added some more detail from the Chelsea book (saw it by off-chance in the Library) and completed the stubs for the Chelsea players. I have put it up for assessment and it should at least get off the stub rating.Gmac101 (talk) 12:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Great Chelsea Flickr images

As one of the main people that Chelsea to FA status, I thought you might be interested to know that while casually searching, I found a really great Flickr user, with a load of Chelsea related images. All of which are free use. On a quick run through I got an image for the Carling Cup Final, Essien, Steve Clarke, Hilario and a face on image of Frank Lampard. You might be able to find some other useful ones as well. here Gran² 16:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, as said, the are all Creative Commons 2.0, which is free to use on here. And the image taker will have chosen that license, so he shouldn't have a problem with it. Gran² 20:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Do you know...

... if Clarence Seedorf still holds the record for winning the champions league with three different clubs, I know he was as of 2004.

Krummy2 11:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks I thought that you would be the person to askKrummy2 13:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Chelsea FC

Thanks for your response on the topic. Squash Racket 08:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

RE: Chelsea F.C. by season

I created the Chelsea F.C. by season article as it links to Chelsea season reviews. The Chelsea F.C. seasons page links to season reviews in English football, and not specifically focusing on Chelsea, when you click on a year.

So can I change the link to a season review, if available, for a particular year on the Chelsea F.C. seasons page?

By the way, do you know any sites that have appeareances/stats of individual players in the past. Would appreciate it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Azlan2k7 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 19 July 2007.

ThanksAzlan2k7 19:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Pat Nevin

Pat Nevin does NOT have an "academic degree in art". He has an arts degree. Why interfere in something you know nothing about? 82.35.59.204 18:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

1. Pat Nevin does indeed not have a degree in art, a mistake on my part which I now deeply regret.
2. I suggest you read what vandalism is not before making allegations
3. I suggest you check the entire edit before reverting, since you also removed the wikilink and defaultsort I added.
4. Unsourced and pov comments like "one of Scotland's worst universities" are not appropriate for Wikipedia.

Thank you.

SteveO 20:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Maybe I should put alink to one of the many university league tables which backs that "pov" up. Perhaps next time you could put a proper summary of your edits in the log 82.35.59.204 03:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

It would be far more helpful to add links to those many university league tables to the actual Glasgow Caledonian article, rather than one of its ex-students. Then an interested reader can decide for themselves whether it is "one of Scotland's worst universities". SteveO 18:03, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Copyrighted fixtures

Which fixture is copyrighted? Barclays Premier League, UEFA Champions League, FA Community Shield, FA Cup or all of them?--ClaudioMB 00:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

The Barclays Premier League could be copyrighted because belongs to Barclays. The others I doubt. So, until there is a source telling any other is copyrighted, it could be used. One question, do you have a source for Barclays Premier League be copyrighted? Please, I'd like to see it. By the way, next time, before remove everything, please remove just what is copyright violation or ask for who included it to remove it. Thanks.--ClaudioMB 00:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

It's clear that the fixture is copyrighted. The table does not seem to be copyrighted. Also the results appear not to be copyrighted. So, it's possible to publish the matches after they are played. Do you know anything about that?--ClaudioMB 03:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Chelsea fc 2007-08

No problem, so would i still be allowed to do this:

WikiProject Snooker request

As a member of WikiProject Snooker, it is requested that you watchlist at least the following pages:

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Snooker - if the project members do not pay attention to changes at the project page, especially its talk page, effective collaboration will be nearly impossible and the project would eventually fail.
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Snooker/Wanted snooker bios - this is an important part of the project's to-do list.
• Snooker - our main article, frequently subject to vandalism and nonsense edits that (historically) have sometimes taken hours or even an entire day to be fixed
• Snooker season 2006/2007 - another important article
• Snooker world rankings 2006/2007 - another important article
• One or more player articles of your choice that you'd like to "adopt" as a guardian against vandalism, PoV-pushing, etc.

Keeping in touch with the rest of the team via the project pages, and keeping an occasional eye on core articles will go a long way to strengthening the project and protecting the articles. Thank you for your time and attention. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 03:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Football on the main page.

Just letting you know I've made a request for a football team article to appear on the main page for the start of the season. Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests Buc 07:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Main page request

Just thought you might like to know that I’ve made a request for Only Fools and Horses to appear on the main page on Sep 8th. Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests Buc 19:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

You can show support for it the appear on the main page too if you want. Buc 11:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Henry VII of England

Henry VII of England has received some heavy editing recently. Would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 19:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Australian Open (tennis)

Hello. You've asked why Borg didn't enter the Australian Open after 1974. I've made some modifications in the Australian Open article (tennis) to explain that this tournament became really important and deserved the "Grand Slam tournament" only in 1969, 1971 and from 1983 (see paragraph "History"). If you want other explications about the greatest tennis events, from a sporting view, since 1950 you can read my paragraph "Slam tournaments at the beginning of the open era", the 29th in Talk:World number one male tennis player rankings with some disagreements by others as jeffreyneave, german friend and SgtJohn. Carlo Colussi 13:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

• In conclusion almost no great champions entered this tournament in the 70s : Connors twice, Borg once, Mac never before 83 and Nastase only once in 1981 at ... 35 years old. Carlo Colussi 06:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Joe Bugner

Your recent edit to Joe Bugner (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Erroneous revert reported here. SteveO 18:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:A Losing Streak.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:A Losing Streak.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BritandBeyonce ^{(talk•contribs)} 09:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Template help

Hey SteveO, I noticed you've been correcting the Southend and Brentford templates I created... cool, thanks, keep up the great work! The Rambling Man 21:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Only Fools Chain Gang.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Only Fools Chain Gang.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Only Fools Little Problems.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Only Fools Little Problems.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Only Fools Sky's The Limit.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Only Fools Sky's The Limit.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Only fools Sickness and Wealth.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Only fools Sickness and Wealth.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Only fools strangers on the shore.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Only fools strangers on the shore.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Only fools tea for three.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Only fools tea for three.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

User:Stocky37

Hi Steve - Stocky37 (talk · contribs) has been making what I'm 99% sure are hoax Chelsea-related articles, but I'd appreciate you double-checking for me. In any case you might want to be aware of their edits... Qwghlm (talk) 17:47, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Frank Lampard

ARE YOU THE FRANK LAMPARD POLICE OR SOMETHING? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.28.44.187 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 21 November 2007

Yes. SteveO (talk) 23:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Jackass

Are you Steve O from MTV's Jackass? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.91.137.211 (talk) 13:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thankfully not. SteveO 14:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

John Terry

You took a comment off the John Terry page saying it is unsubstantiated. Can you explain why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.73.107.250 (talk) 12:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

The incident with the doorman is covered above, but all of the other claims were unsourced. Per Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people, all negative, unsourced material should be removed immediately. Additionally, adding your own personal commentary to an article about an individual is not appropriate. SteveO (talk) 13:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chelsea F.C. and FC Barcelona football rivalry

An article that you have been involved in editing, Chelsea F.C. and FC Barcelona football rivalry, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea F.C. and FC Barcelona football rivalry. Thank you. – PeeJay 23:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Pablo García

I know there is more than one person with this name, but I didn't "dissapeared" the 'disambiguation and musician pages' if you go to Pablo García you will see the references to Pablo García (footballer), and Juan Pablo García. I did it to all three pages, so Pablo García would be a meaningless 'desambiguation page'. Please put it in the order it was, or there will be a page 'in vain'. Colomero (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I understand what you mean, but I ain't giving notability to anyone, I just tried to fix the meaningless 'desambiguation page', as I commented earlier. About the move tag, I'm not very familiarized with it, so please if you could do it and fix it the right way, that would be great, and remember I didn't give priority to anyone. Colomero (talk) 17:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

If you think it should stay that way, then it'll stay like that. Sorry about the inconvinient.

Colomero (talk) 17:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Only Fools Batman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Only Fools Batman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ron Harris.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ron Harris.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Speediedixon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Speediedixon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thicker Than Water.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thicker Than Water.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FACup97.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FACup97.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FrankFraser.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FrankFraser.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)