Jump to content

Talk:Amyraldism: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
four point ... Calvinism?
 
Jim Ellis (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Four point Calvinism ==
== Four point Calvinism ==
Since Amyraldism is perhaps the most popular form of Calvinism, in the wider Evangelical world, should we add the Calvinism template here? Amyraldians very commonly think of themselves as Calvinian Calvinists (a term that I think was coined by a professor of mine - an Amyraldian). [[User:Mkmcconn|Mkmcconn]][[User Talk:Mkmcconn| <small>(Talk)</small>]] 22:22, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
Since Amyraldism is perhaps the most popular form of Calvinism, in the wider Evangelical world, should we add the Calvinism template here? Amyraldians very commonly think of themselves as Calvinian Calvinists (a term that I think was coined by a professor of mine - an Amyraldian). [[User:Mkmcconn|Mkmcconn]][[User Talk:Mkmcconn| <small>(Talk)</small>]] 22:22, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

:True Amyraldism is Calvinistic in that it maintains the particularity of sovereign grace in election. Therefore, I have no problem including the Calvinism template, which by the way, looks good. I believe most would agree that technically it is a brand of Calvinism, even though I don't agree with it. :-) [[User:Jim Ellis|Jim Ellis]] 22:52, July 22, 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:52, 22 July 2005

Four point Calvinism

Since Amyraldism is perhaps the most popular form of Calvinism, in the wider Evangelical world, should we add the Calvinism template here? Amyraldians very commonly think of themselves as Calvinian Calvinists (a term that I think was coined by a professor of mine - an Amyraldian). Mkmcconn (Talk) 22:22, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

True Amyraldism is Calvinistic in that it maintains the particularity of sovereign grace in election. Therefore, I have no problem including the Calvinism template, which by the way, looks good. I believe most would agree that technically it is a brand of Calvinism, even though I don't agree with it.  :-) Jim Ellis 22:52, July 22, 2005 (UTC)