Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/A. K. Fazlul Huq/1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:34, 13 March 2008

A. K. Fazlul Huq

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page

Result pending

The reviewer has delisted the aricle on the grounds that it does not have inline citation and the prose is poor. The article uses Harvard referencing which is an acceptable style of inline citation. The prose may not be FA worthy but it is reasonably clear and I believe free from grammatical / spelling problem. If not, the reviewer should at least point out a few grammatical / spelling problems that (s)he notices. Arman ^(Talk) 10:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are no inline citations at all that I can see and parts are almost hagiographical. The prose can also do with plenty of improvemnt. imo, lack of inline citations itself is a killer. Not GA-worthy. Sarvagnya 04:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 : {{GAR/current}}
 The reviewer has delisted the aricle on the grounds that it does not have inline citation and the prose is poor. The article uses Harvard referencing which is an acceptable [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citation styles|style of inline citation]]. The prose may not be FA worthy but it is reasonably clear and I believe free from grammatical / spelling problem. If not, the reviewer should at least point out a few grammatical / spelling problems that (s)he notices. '''[[User:Armanaziz|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#005e07">Arman</span>]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Armanaziz|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#D00">Talk</span>]])</sup> 10:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
+:There are no inline citations at all that I can see and parts are almost hagiographical.  The prose can also do with plenty of improvemnt.  imo, lack of inline citations itself is a killer.  Not GA-worthy.  [[:User_talk:Sarvagnya|Sarvagnya]] 04:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)