File:Matissedance.jpg: Difference between revisions

"The Dance II" (1909) by Henri Matisse (1869-1954).Dimensions 260 x 391 cm (Hermitage version).

Fair use rationale in Henri Matisse:

1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in The Dance (painting):

1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in Fauvism:

1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in History of painting:

1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in Sergei Shchukin:

1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in Western painting:

1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in The Rite of Spring:

1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in Late Modernism:

1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Fair use rationale in Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007:

1. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
2. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
3. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
4. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
5. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

This image may be public domain in the United States, if it was published (not merely created) before 1923.

This image represents a two-dimensional work of art, such as a drawing, painting, print, or similar creation. The copyright for this image is likely owned by either the artist who created it, the individual who commissioned the work, or their legal heirs. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of artworks: for purposes of critical commentary on: the specific work in question, the artistic genre or technique employed in the artwork, or the artistic school or tradition to which the artist is associated, as applied within the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers located in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other use of this image, whether on Wikipedia or elsewhere, could potentially constitute a copyright infringement. For further information, please refer to Wikipedia's guidelines on non-free content. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Matissedance.jpg true

To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content § Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright templates. However, it is believed that the use of this work: To illustrate the subject in question Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Matissedance.jpg true

To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale. This tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.